Started By
Message

re: Oil Spill and Offshore Fishing (Latest Developments)

Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:36 pm to
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74248 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

With oil heading toward the fragile shoreline, an oil company executive said today it could take 90 days to plug the leaks spewing up to 5,000 barrels of crude a day from the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico.


90 days
Posted by eye65
Member since Aug 2009
987 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:37 pm to
Baytiger.

Not sure this is reliable but it is being quoted by Mobile Press Register and CNN. Federal Govt, and BP are not saying this. Just scientist.
LINK
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74248 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

This, and other radar images that SkyTruth is getting, confirm what we've seen on the NASA/MODIS images so far, and support our conservative calculations showing that in the first week of this spill at least 6 million gallons have entered the Gulf. That's a spill rate of at least 850,000 gallons (20,000 barrels) per day, 20 times larger than the official Goast Guard estimate of 42,000 gallons per day.
Posted by redneck
Los Suenos, Costa Rica
Member since Dec 2003
54181 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:38 pm to
i really wanna just call into work and say look im goin fishing sorry about my shifts
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:39 pm to
yeah I saw that blog a while ago, but it's dated yesterday and I'm not gonna buy anything until the gov't or BP says it.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52563 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

It doesn't matter. The point is that whatever damage occurs to the Louisiana coast as a result of this spill, regardless of which company is "responsible", will not be adequately
You're just as much at fault as the oil companies. It is us of course, as consumers, who continue to increase the demand for oil
Posted by glassman
Next to the beer taps at Finn's
Member since Oct 2008
118268 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

90 days


Zach some of the OG guys on here have said up to as long as five months.
Posted by TigerFred
Feeding hamsters
Member since Aug 2003
27869 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:39 pm to
I fricked up on what I was saying earlier about the flow. It was meant to be 42,000 gallons of oil and not bbls.


This little incident was Thunderhorse


Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

Things are certainly worse than they appear
I don't doubt that at all... but you're the one with the apparent inside info, right?
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52563 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

baytiger
This post was edited on 4/29/10 at 5:46 pm
Posted by Solo
Member since Aug 2008
8257 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:41 pm to
Serious question. Is a rig explosion like this an unforseen event? Nobody ran this scenario beforehand to come up with a game plan?

Posted by blueTunaTiger
Gulf of Mexico, USA
Member since Feb 2009
3696 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:42 pm to
Fred, did they ever find out (announce) what the true cause of this was?
Posted by TigerFred
Feeding hamsters
Member since Aug 2003
27869 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Serious question. Is a rig explosion like this an unforseen event?


Read this thread LINK

The Thunderhorse list was investigated and the root cause of the problem was corrected.
This post was edited on 4/29/10 at 5:45 pm
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:43 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/29/10 at 5:50 pm
Posted by redneck
Los Suenos, Costa Rica
Member since Dec 2003
54181 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:44 pm to
lsusaintsman03@yahoo.com
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52563 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

Is a rig explosion like this an unforseen event?
Pretty much
quote:

Nobody ran this scenario beforehand to come up with a game plan?
You can't take into account every possible scenario. So many things can go wrong at any given time during all of this. The majority of the time everything goes smoothly, but all it takes is something like this to expose you. But it's impossible to factor in all human error and mother nature
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32733 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

Serious question. Is a rig explosion like this an unforseen event? Nobody ran this scenario beforehand to come up with a game plan?


quote:

The massive gush of oil spilling from the site of the rig that exploded last week exceeds the worst-case scenario predicted by oil giant BP when it filed its exploration plan with the government. The scale of the disaster is also having political repercussions, putting lawmakers who support offshore drilling on the defensive.

Yesterday, the estimated size of the spill quintupled to over 210,000 gallons a day. In BP's exploration plan, which allowed it to avoid filing a more detailed site-specific plan, the company outlined a worst-case scenario of 162,000 gallons a day.

In addition, the federal agency with oversight of offshore drilling, the Interior Department's Minerals and Management Service did not require BP to file a "scenario for potential blowout," referring to the sudden release of oil from a well.

According to the exploration plan obtained by Huffington Post, an MMS official certified that BP "has the capacity to respond, to the maximum extent practicable, to a worst-case discharge, or a substantial threat of such a discharge."


LINK

As some people has been saying, there is plenty of blame to spread around.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52563 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

As some people has been saying, there is plenty of blame to spread around.
Oh yeah, and trust me they are all pointing fingers right now
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32733 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:47 pm to
Can you cc me on any updates? You have my email addy from last night.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 5:48 pm to
Are the scientst basing that calculation off of the satellite image of the sheen? Correct me if I'm wrong but can't the sheen make it appear that there is actually more fuel/oil in water than there actually is?

Ever pour a cup of diesel or gas in the water. It triples in size almost intantly.

I think that is why there may be some descripancy in the amount that is being spilled.
first pageprev pagePage 26 of 73Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram