Started By
Message

re: Oil Spill and Offshore Fishing (Latest Developments)

Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:03 am to
Posted by Tommy Patel
Member since Apr 2006
7558 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:03 am to
quote:

another article i just read stated that it did not matter where it hit this weekend. as the oil continues to flow and the tides, currents and winds change eventually the entire gulf may be affected.


Is it just me or does it seem kind of odd that there's a lot of intel about how much effort is being put into the clean-up and yet I read "landfall immanent". Am I being totally unreasonable to assume that we would have a better plan in place for such an incident? there are more than just a couple rigs out there.Was BP thinking "Worst case scenarios" and "could happen" are lost philosophies that only happen to other companies?
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:11 am to
Is this the BOP that failed?

This post was edited on 4/29/10 at 9:14 am
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89129 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Am I being totally unreasonable to assume that we would have a better plan in place for such an incident?


Yes. That's like asking if it was unreasonable to assume a better plan in place for 9/11 or Katrina.
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:15 am to
quote:

Yes. That's like asking if it was unreasonable to assume a better plan in place for 9/11 or Katrina.
Did 911 and katrina have safety equipment that failed?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89129 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:17 am to
Katrina sure as hell did.
Posted by TigerDog83
Member since Oct 2005
8849 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:18 am to
A similar argument could be made regarding airport security and 9/11.
Posted by Weaver
Madisonville, LA
Member since Nov 2005
28124 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:19 am to
Are we really in for some trouble with this? I know it is 15 miles from the coast, but WWL is basically saying it will get onshore tonight and our seafood industry will be screwed for the foreseeable future.

Why wasn't something done starting Friday, when the search was called off for survivors? It has been almost a week now and they have done nothing.
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Katrina sure as hell did.

touche'
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:24 am to
question.

With this new news regarding the added amount of oil escaping,could this be the result of one of the R.O.V's down there turning the wrong thing and making the oil leak out faster?
Posted by Alatgr
Mobeezy, Alabizzle
Member since Sep 2005
18113 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:25 am to
Do those models take into account the fact that the slick is getting bigger by thousands of barrels a day? Cause it doesn't look like it. Which means we're extra fricked.
Posted by nhassl1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
1934 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Do those models take into account the fact that the slick is getting bigger by thousands of barrels a day? Cause it doesn't look like it. Which means we're extra fricked.


yes
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9666 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:33 am to
quote:

...could this be the result of one of the R.O.V's down there turning the wrong thing and making the oil leak out faster?


I doubt it. I'm sure it's more complicated than "righty, tighty" and lefty, loosey"; but I doubt the ROV operations exacerbated the problem.

My GUESS is that it is difficult to estimated the flow rate of one liquid into another liquid, 5,000' below sea level.
Posted by nhassl1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
1934 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:33 am to
but it is still just a best guess with known considerations. if they can hardly accurately predict the weather the next day how accurate do think their predictions are? they have to take into account wave action, currents, and wind.
This post was edited on 4/29/10 at 9:35 am
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89129 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:33 am to
quote:


With this new news regarding the added amount of oil escaping,could this be the result of one of the R.O.V's down there turning the wrong thing and making the oil leak out faster?


I have no clue.

I doubt it, but I base that on absolutely nothing.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52563 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Why wasn't something done starting Friday, when the search was called off for survivors? It has been almost a week now and they have done nothing.
Wrong. Clean up crews have been on site since day one.
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9666 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:39 am to
I'm assuming the wellhead was flowing all along, even though it was reported not to be after the rig sank. That was crude feeding the fire for 36 hours, wasn't it? Could the 700,000g of diesel onboard fueled the fire for 36 hours?
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24870 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:40 am to
So those ROVs are suppose to shut the oil flow off? And the subs are suppose to be able to do this? So where is the valve or screw or lever that does this on the ROV (in pic)?

Maybe they need to design one with a big ON-OFF lever?

Maybe since this is going to costs them over 200 million dollars they maybe just might want to think and design something a little simplier?

JUST MAYBE?
Posted by tgrgrd00
Kenner, LA
Member since Jun 2004
11554 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Wrong. Clean up crews have been on site since day one.


Really? I asked about clean up on day 2 and there didn't appear to be any clean up efforts underway at that time.

Posted by TigerDog83
Member since Oct 2005
8849 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Really? I asked about clean up on day 2 and there didn't appear to be any clean up efforts underway at that time.


At that point almost all the oil was being burned up in the fire because the riser was still attached to the BOP and the MODU. That situation changed when the rig sunk.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 4/29/10 at 9:45 am to
quote:



Really? I asked about clean up on day 2 and there didn't appear to be any clean up efforts underway at that time.



Thats because there wasnt any clean up operation initialized at that time. They were in search and rescue mode and just trying to contain the fuel/oil that was leaking, not a full fledged clean up operation as they are in now and have been since last Friday.
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 73Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram