- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Links to live feeds from remotely operated vehicles (ROV)
Posted on 5/29/10 at 12:45 pm to the LSUSaint
Posted on 5/29/10 at 12:45 pm to the LSUSaint
They had one ready but went with QCP instead. They are another connector company
Posted on 5/29/10 at 12:45 pm to the LSUSaint
quote:
live feed AND TOP KILL discussion
Not sure what a hot tap is, but if they have the equipment, why not just clamp the riser, even if it is past the main leak and shuts down the smaller leaks? Leaks are letting pressure escape and they are trying to find ways to increas the pressure to go down the well.
think of it like this.
your hose is running and you have 4 holes. the biggest hole is closest to the spout. so you kink the hose between the first and the second hole. what's gonna happen to the first (bigger) hole?
Posted on 5/29/10 at 12:54 pm to tigerdup07
simple, it will either:
A) stay the same because the hole will only let so much volume out in accordance with the pressure
B)It would make the hole larger because of more pressure. HIGHLY HIGHLY unlikely die to the thickness of the riser. Pressure didn't make that hole in the riser, the bending an twisting from the sinking rig caused teh holes in the riser.
If you tehn commenced to pumping the heavy mud, it would take up part of the volume excaping the riser leak, therefore leaving the only option for teh mud to be going down the well.
A) stay the same because the hole will only let so much volume out in accordance with the pressure
B)It would make the hole larger because of more pressure. HIGHLY HIGHLY unlikely die to the thickness of the riser. Pressure didn't make that hole in the riser, the bending an twisting from the sinking rig caused teh holes in the riser.
If you tehn commenced to pumping the heavy mud, it would take up part of the volume excaping the riser leak, therefore leaving the only option for teh mud to be going down the well.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 12:57 pm to the LSUSaint
Been out a while. From what I'm seeing look like we right back where we started/ That is straight oil i'm lookin at?
Posted on 5/29/10 at 12:58 pm to MoreOrLes
don't let the lighting fool you. it's mud.

Posted on 5/29/10 at 1:02 pm to tigerdup07
quote:
so you kink the hose between the first and the second hole
If there's a strong of drill pipe inside that hose, I don't think you are going to crimp it.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 1:06 pm to tigerdup07
I now nothings a sure thing and this is all experimental but I am aggravated that the "Best and brightest in the world" thought that they could pump down the path of MOST resistance. This was pumping down one side of a T while the other remained open.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 1:14 pm to MoreOrLes
quote:
now nothings a sure thing and this is all experimental but I am aggravated that the "Best and brightest in the world" thought that they could pump down the path of MOST resistance.
Remind me, what would you have done? I am not jacking with you, I am really curious.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 1:18 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Remind me, what would you have done? I am not jacking with you, I am really curious.
I wouldnt call this a failure yet but a 60-70% success rate seemed a little generous. Not sure where they came up with that, especially if this has never been done before.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 1:24 pm to JudgeHolden
Well first let me give you a bit of background. I am a licensed General Contractor both Commercial and Residential. My father is a General Contractor for the last 40 years up till Katrina was our Family Business. I have wired houses myself and I have done the plumbing in two of my own houses. (with my own hands)
Having said that I really did not think that any of this would work without clogging up at least partially the open end of the riser. (You can check my post history)
I personally think the concentration needs to move to multiple methods of capturing the oil on the surface of the water. Tankers like the Shell CEO said.
I think BP and the rest of the OIL co. know this thing will not be shut off until the relief well shuts it off
Also in my post history you will see that I admit to not knowing shite when it comes to drilling for oil.....just know about plumbing in buildings and swimming pools.
Having said that I really did not think that any of this would work without clogging up at least partially the open end of the riser. (You can check my post history)
I personally think the concentration needs to move to multiple methods of capturing the oil on the surface of the water. Tankers like the Shell CEO said.
I think BP and the rest of the OIL co. know this thing will not be shut off until the relief well shuts it off
Also in my post history you will see that I admit to not knowing shite when it comes to drilling for oil.....just know about plumbing in buildings and swimming pools.
This post was edited on 5/29/10 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 5/29/10 at 1:31 pm to MoreOrLes
quote:
Having said that I really did not think that any of this would work without clogging up at least partially the open end of the riser. (You can check my post history)
I'm with you. I thought the idea was that if you got a net gain on the mud, then you would push the oil column down and then have a static well. So, for example, if the volume of the well and the riser was 2,500 barrels, then you would need roughly that much to fill it up. Once full, the weight of the mud will keep it from leaking. If you pumped 1000 barrels and hour and leaked 750 and hour, then, if you kept pumping, you would kill the well after ten hours of pumping. So it does not matter that you have an open system, as long as you can pump in a net gain that will get there in a short enough time. That is the whole purpose of a dynamic kill, which is always in an open system. You are just racing the leak.
To my engineer buddies, I know this is simplistic, that, among other things, there is a sea pressure boost and that you wouldn't need a full column to hold the oil down. I'm just trying to express the concept as I understand it.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 1:33 pm to MoreOrLes
quote:
I think BP and the rest of the OIL co. know this thing will not be shut off until the relief well shuts it off
Maybe. But I think you would agree that they should not stop trying things that might work in the meantime. And since there are things that might work, then I don't think you can say they "know" what you say they know.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 1:35 pm to MoreOrLes
I think that they hoped for the best and can't fault them for at least trying. It doesn't seem like this had any downside other than the comparably-mild effect of all the drilling mud escaping into the sea. Would it have been possible to reverse the direction of the siphon and pump mud through the insertion tool at the same time they are pumping mud into the BOP?
Posted on 5/29/10 at 1:35 pm to JudgeHolden
Heres the deal if they could control the broken end of the riser somewhat, than I believe TOP kill would have worked. However if they could control the riser they probably would not have even done Top Kill.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 1:40 pm to Big L
My guess is the insertion tube holds no pressure therefore leaving it in would have been worthless.
I'm just frustrated like everybody...I mean 60 to 70% its gonna work then we are not leaking oil just mud. We wont know till Sunday if it works. Then this shite combined with bussed in workers....i'm just starting to feel like it is just a big Dog and Pony show.
Let me be clear while im moaning like a bitch....I appreciate all those that have truly worked tirelessly to try to get this shut off.
I'm just frustrated like everybody...I mean 60 to 70% its gonna work then we are not leaking oil just mud. We wont know till Sunday if it works. Then this shite combined with bussed in workers....i'm just starting to feel like it is just a big Dog and Pony show.
Let me be clear while im moaning like a bitch....I appreciate all those that have truly worked tirelessly to try to get this shut off.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 1:47 pm to MoreOrLes
quote:
My guess is the insertion tube holds no pressure therefore leaving it in would have been worthles
I think that is on the money. It had to be inserted with a makeshift packer to seal off around the drill pipe that was in the riser. It would have just blown out if they pressured up on it.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 2:11 pm to MoreOrLes
quote:
I now nothings a sure thing and this is all experimental but I am aggravated that the "Best and brightest in the world" thought that they could pump down the path of MOST resistance. This was pumping down one side of a T while the other remained open.
It's all about pressure. It's not an all-or-nothing proposition as suggested by the phrase "least resistance". Most of the mud will flow out the leaks but not all. How much will flow out the leaks depends on how big they are.
Take a soda straw and put it in a glass of water. Put a pinhole in the straw above the water line. Blow in the straw hard enough and you can still force air though the bottom of the straw to make bubbles. Keep making pinholes and eventually you will reach a point where you can't make bubbles any more. But if you blow even harder you can. So their hope was that they could push with enough pressure to "outrun" the leaks. That didn't happen so they tried plugging some of the leaks. That still didn't work so now they move on to the next thing. Even though it didn't work, it was still worth a try.
Posted on 5/29/10 at 2:46 pm to theDORSEY72
Well...we're 0 for 2. Hopefully 3rd times a charm.
Popular
Back to top


0





