Started By
Message

re: Zillow: 242 US cities now have starter homes that cost $1M

Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:18 pm to
Posted by chrome_daddy
LA (Lower Ashvegas)
Member since May 2004
2592 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

The amount boomers and others will stick their head in the sand
OK, Mr Victim, what would you have people do? I'm not moving to those areas so why should I care?
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
37356 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:19 pm to
If you want an anecdotal data point that government interference, regulation, and taxes create an affordability and housing crisis, here you go:

quote:

New York and New Jersey are the fastest-growing states on the list, adding 15 cities combined in the past year. New York's total has reached 41 — up from just 12 before the pandemic — while New Jersey's has grown to 26, up from only one. The pattern mirrors what Zillow found in its 2026 hottest markets analysis: Six of the 10 most competitive housing markets in the country are in the Northeast, where new construction has lagged and inventory deficits run deep.


New York's population is basically flat over the last five years and New Jersey's is up by about 3% over that same timeframe.
Posted by evil cockroach
27.98N // 86.92E
Member since Nov 2007
9242 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

I think they're overlooking the definition of a "starter home"...
Posted by forkedintheroad
Member since Feb 2025
2496 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

If most people can’t afford it, then don’t buy and prices will drop.


That only works if you don't have a third party controlling the supply, aka PE and China.

We only have ourselves to blame for this. We don't own shite anymore.
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
21118 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

I was looking for sizing which should be the criteria, imo.


Correct. 1,500 sq ft IS the traditional size of a starter home.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
37356 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

That only works if you don't have a third party controlling the supply, aka PE and China.


Please go into more detail about what you're suggesting here and how it's affecting our housing market.
Posted by CPA Yung Boi
Member since Apr 2026
76 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Once again, another article that doesn't define what is a starter home.


quote:

A typical "starter home" is defined for this analysis as a home in the lowest third of home values in a given region.


Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
140220 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

OK, Mr Victim, what would you have people do?


Some people just blame others. It's what the world is now.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
20969 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:30 pm to
Looks like a California and New York problem. With Florida’s coastal cities following behind.

Most of the US is not dealing with starter homes requiring $1M.
Posted by CPA Yung Boi
Member since Apr 2026
76 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

I was looking for sizing which should be the criteria, imo.


You have to buy what is in the market.

Live in reality not some fantasy land where you make up all the rules.
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 1:33 pm
Posted by Kinderman
Member since Oct 2023
1607 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:33 pm to
Price has always been the primary factor in a starter home because they’re generally for young couples starting their lives. In the past size and cost have lined up to expectations, but in a lot of places that’s not the case anymore.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
37356 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

You have to buy what is in the market.


You don't have to buy. You can rent and wait until things get to where you're comfortable. I'm doing it right now in one of those $1MM starter home cities.
Posted by CPA Yung Boi
Member since Apr 2026
76 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

You don't have to buy. You can rent and wait until things get to where you're comfortable.


The American Dream: multi family living in builder grade high rises
Posted by MRTigerFan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
7181 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:36 pm to
quote:


I googled, looks like .01% of all cities.

I think you need to put a population minimum (maybe 100k) to get an accurate percentage. You can't really compare a town with a population of 1126 to big cities.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95880 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:37 pm to
So, virtually all the increase is in Cali, New York and Jersey?

Got it.

Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36452 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:41 pm to
“Living in Palo Alto is a human right!”

- progressive democrats (probably)
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
34578 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:41 pm to
dont believe Virginia at 1.
Posted by KingOfTheWorld
South of heaven, west of hell
Member since Oct 2018
7817 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:49 pm to
Yesterday I was looking at real estate listings in Charleston SC. Many 1200-1500 sq ft, 3BR 2BA homes on tiny lots going for $700k to $1M.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
37356 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

The American Dream: multi family living in builder grade high rises


Because heaven forbid someone not be able to get exactly what they want when they want it at the price they think they should get to pay.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
37356 posts
Posted on 6/23/26 at 1:56 pm to
quote:


“Living in Palo Alto is a human right!”

- progressive democrats (probably)


Palo Alto is a perfect example of what I was talking about. As liberal as it comes but they created this situation themselves through their policy.

The NIMBYs there and how they set up zoning is hilarious.

quote:

Palo Alto, CA is another prominent example of a highly restrictive zoning landscape, with 80% to 90% of its total residential land zoned exclusively for single-family homes.

According to data compiled in the City of Palo Alto Housing Element, while single-family zones consume about 19% of the city's total total land area, dedicated multi-family residential zoning accounts for less than 3% of total land
This post was edited on 6/23/26 at 1:59 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram