- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You Moon landing deniers are all complete idiots...
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:05 pm to TigerGman
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:05 pm to TigerGman
quote:
you cannot make a single logical argument why we would lie about that.
I'm not saying it didn't happen, but.... You are telling me that in 1969 we went to the moon and have never once gone back??? Why not???
Technology is 100x what it was then. You would think at this point we would have people living on the moon.
I have no facts to say it isn't real, I just don't think it happened. It doesn't make any sense.
5
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:08 pm to tigerbait17
I love the buck rogers talk. Free energy and cold fusion for all. Just after someone wins the powerball.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:34 pm to TigerGman
Like i’m going to believe a word a “GMan” says….
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:40 pm to Rick9Plus
quote:
Like i’m going to believe a word a “GMan” says….
Nice substantive, to the point response "Rick".
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:41 pm to TigerGman
quote:
Elon Musk isn't worried about "radiation".
Elon may not be worried about radiation but he IS worried about fuel.
And he would have to refuel his rocket approximately 23 times while orbiting the earth to get his technology back to the moon.
But they did it with no refueling in a tin can with duct tape and electrical tape?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:42 pm to tigerbait17
quote:
You are telling me that in 1969 we went to the moon and have never once gone back???
Not just once, but 5 more times
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:42 pm to TigerGman
"Lost Technology"
Like any commidy in life, if you have an edge, you dont destroy all "Technology" You sell that Sh*t.
Like any commidy in life, if you have an edge, you dont destroy all "Technology" You sell that Sh*t.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:44 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
But they did it with no refueling in a tin can with duct tape and electrical tape?
LMAO! refuel a Saturn V rocket, so it could land back fully intact on the launch pad at the Cape right?
Idiot.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:47 pm to tigerbait17
quote:We did go back 5 times after the original landing.
I'm not saying it didn't happen, but.... You are telling me that in 1969 we went to the moon and have never once gone back??? Why not??? Technology is 100x what it was then. You would think at this point we would have people living on the moon. I have no facts to say it isn't real, I just don't think it happened. It doesn't make any sense.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:47 pm to TigerGman
I hate when ppl try to act as if our government would lie to us.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:48 pm to TigerGman
quote:
LMAO! refuel a Saturn V rocket, so it could land back fully intact on the launch pad at the Cape right?
quote:
Idiot
Correct. Because in your own hubris you mentioned Saturn V. Elon will be using his starship technology. Now, tell the class how you really have no fricking idea about this subject and should just bow out of it now.
Idiot.
A simple X search would have done you good. Idiot thinks we are going to the moon in a rocket meant to lift satellites
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 12/22/25 at 4:51 pm to TigerGman
quote:
TigerGman
Where'd you go bitch?
Sit right here and hold my pocket.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:00 pm to rickyh
quote:260°F (127°C) in sunlight
Tell us the temp on the moon on the sunny side
quote:depends on the shielding
tell us what the radiation exposure there and back would be
quote:Wheelbase 7.5 ft (2.3 m)
How big was the Rover?
Length 10 ft (3.0 m)
Height 3.6 feet (1.1 m)
462 lbs
quote:Each LRV was carried to the Moon folded up in the Lunar Module's Quadrant 1 Bay. After being unpacked, each was driven an average of 20 miles (30 km), without major incident.
And how was it transported?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:02 pm to Errerrerrwere
Your critical thinking skills are seriously lacking, you lack perspective, and you seem to suffer from severe confirmation bias. That all and more seems to be common among the moon landing deniers.
Might I suggest you open your mind and learn some about science and engineering.
Might I suggest you open your mind and learn some about science and engineering.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:04 pm to wallowinit
quote:
Your critical thinking skills are seriously lacking, you lack perspective, and you seem to suffer from severe confirmation bias. That all and more seems to be common among the moon landing deniers.
Care to argue anything that Elon said that I posted?
quote:
Might I suggest you open your mind and learn some about science and engineering.
BS in Engineering LSU!
frick off. Come with better.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:10 pm to TigerGman
The moon landing was real! 
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:18 pm to TigerGman
quote:
you cannot make a single logical argument why we would lie about that.
The entire word was watching the Space Race 24/7, and at the height of the propaganda driven Cold War, the Russians never said the United States is lying.
Not to mention, not a single person that had to be on it has ever come forward to say it was faked...
ETA: thanks for all the pathetically embarrassing responses you fools are making. I needed a good laugh.
Craaaaaaap, something's wrong! I'm actually agreeing with a LSUx fan!
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:19 pm to TigerGman
Honestly those that don't believe it are ignoring all the evidence that exist and believing some youtube video instead.
No amount of arguing is going to change their minds. They think they are being critical when they are the opposite but feel otherwise, so it's an argument about feelings.
I weep for how the internet and esp social media has shown humans to be no different than those that burned witches because a cow got sick and they found clay in their hearth.
BTW, the argument we did it in the 60s we can't do it now thus it did not happen is like saying, we used to have ships that shot 16 inch shells to soften up defensives during amphibian landings and because we can't shoot those same shells today we must not have actually done it in the 40s.
Oh, and you can see the Lunar landings from Earth from a number of observatories...
No amount of arguing is going to change their minds. They think they are being critical when they are the opposite but feel otherwise, so it's an argument about feelings.
I weep for how the internet and esp social media has shown humans to be no different than those that burned witches because a cow got sick and they found clay in their hearth.
BTW, the argument we did it in the 60s we can't do it now thus it did not happen is like saying, we used to have ships that shot 16 inch shells to soften up defensives during amphibian landings and because we can't shoot those same shells today we must not have actually done it in the 40s.
Oh, and you can see the Lunar landings from Earth from a number of observatories...
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:20 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Care to argue anything that Elon said that I posted?
what did Elon say?
You posted something from X that was a repost from a tiktok video.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:23 pm to Cdawg
quote:
what did Elon say?
I'm not going to reread all of my posts from this thread to you. Go find what Elon said in my original post lazy arse.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 5:23 pm
Page 8 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News