- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You Moon landing deniers are all complete idiots...
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:23 pm to Errerrerrwere
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:23 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:not trying to break up your little spat but it's apples to oranges
Care to argue anything that Elon said that I posted?
Different rocket sizes with different fuels with different payloads with different landing plans
1
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:24 pm to TiVoTiger
quote:
All technology destroyed: Why?
You lose all credibility when you outright lie about something that is easily proven as a fact. The technology was not destroyed. Elements of the process may have been lost to time and obsolescence, but the damn capsule that got us there is sitting in the Smithsonian at this very minute. There are geological artifacts in the same museum and hundreds in the public sector that could easily be proven as fake by any one of a thousand labs within a matter of hours.
quote:
The greatest technological advancements in history have happened after a pocket calculator got 9 missions to the moon with 6 landing on the surface and back, no prob.
Hiroshima might want to weigh in on what can be done with a lot less than that.
Through out time, humans have done extraordinary things well in advance of what thought was humanly possible. It is a proven fact we had the technology to get there. We had the propulsion, the shielding, and the math works.
Regardless, the most telling proof that we did go is that a minimum of 800-1000 people would have had to keep the biggest secret in recorded history without so much as one of them letting it slip. And at least thousands more on the periphery who would have at least some provable knowledge of the endeavor being staged.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:24 pm to manwich
quote:
not trying to break up your little spat but it's apples to oranges
Explain it and be specific.
quote:
Different rocket sizes with different fuels with different payloads with different landing plans
Link? Let's see what ya got, science boy.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:30 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
I'm not going to reread all of my posts from this thread to you. Go find what Elon said in my original post lazy arse.
I just did and it was from a tiktok video.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:32 pm to Cdawg
quote:
I just did and it was from a tiktok video.
I'll just link the Elon interview myself then and make you look even more retarded.
The guy that knows everything about space travel is telling you he needs to refuel 20+ times to get there and we did it in a jet pack.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:38 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
'll just link the Elon interview myself then and make you look even more retarded.
This will only make you look retarded for not doing this from the get go
quote:
The guy that knows everything about space travel
Low earth orbit elon doesn't know everything about space travel
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:41 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
I'll just link the Elon interview myself then
Yeah, that would be nicer than your heresay word or tiktok video.
quote:
and make you look even more retarded
I'm posting on TD responding to you. There is no way I could look more retarded.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:44 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
Low earth orbit elon doesn't know everything about space travel
He knows more than you. That's for sure!
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:44 pm to Cdawg
quote:
But now, in 2025, with all the technological advancements in the last 40 years, we can’t figure out how to do it.
This is one of those classically retarded lines you see parroted a lot.
No, we know exactly how to do it. We don't know how to do it at a price anyone is still willing to pay.
In 1960s, we paid out the nose for NASA, peaking at 4.4% of GDP, Today, we spend at 1/11th of that rate and wonder why it seems insurmountably expensive to do things.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:46 pm to TigerGman
quote:exactly something someone that was trying to keep a secret under wraps would say
not a single person that had to be on it has ever come forward to say it was faked...
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:46 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:do your own research, kid
Link? Let's see what ya got, science boy.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:50 pm to Cdawg
quote:
I'm posting on TD responding to you. There is no way I could look more retarded.
Well you do. And here we are. Now what do we do?
Here he is saying that 20 was highly unlikely. More like 8-10.
LINK
Here is NASA saying it was 20. Now that's got to be embarrassing for them knowing they didn't need that many 60 years ago.
LINK
NASA certainly didn't have to worry about discrepancies in boil off during the golden age of space travel!
LINK
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:51 pm to manwich
quote:
do your own research, kid
I have.
Here is the OT's sources:
"Nuh uhhhhh cuz things and you need to learn science"
and "Trust me bro! We really went there cuz"
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:52 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
He knows more than you. That's for sure!
Sure, but my grandpa has 5 rockets on the moon, to elon's 0... so i'll always have that to fall back on. Chief engineer of the 3rd stage vs guy throwing money at replicating the feat
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:53 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
Sure, but my grandpa has 5 rockets on the moon, to elon's 0... so i'll always have that to fall back on. Chief engineer of the 3rd stage vs guy throwing money at replicating the feat
So a spook?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:57 pm to CAD703X
quote:
Oh and 75 bytes of ram to write the code to blast off, separate modules, fly directly to moon, separate again, land on the moon, take off from the moon, reconnect to orbiter, fly a straight line back to Earth and land in the ocean.
the "code" in the main guidance computer was in about 36k of read only core memory
the source code is available on Github:
Apollo 11 Source Code
and has been poured over by hundreds if not thousand of programmers
you can even find the "Burn Baby, Burn" named master ignition routine here:
Burn Baby Burn
You can also download a Virtual AGC emulator and run the actual code on your own computer from here: Virtual AGC
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 6:24 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 5:58 pm to MoarKilometers
Let's compare paw paws.
Here's mine:
Here's mine:
quote:
He is the only person in NBA history to be named Rookie of the Year, Most Valuable Player, Finals MVP, All-Star MVP, Coach of the Year, and Executive of the Year.[2][3]
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:01 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
So a spook?
No, McDonnell Douglas was as independent from the government as spacex is.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:04 pm to TigerGman
quote:
You Moon landing deniers are all complete idiots.
Both are true.
We went to the moon and much of the moon videos were faked by the CIA for embellishment to win the propaganda war against Russia.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:09 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Well you do.
I'm starting to think not really because I'm not sure you read your own links.
quote:
And here we are. Now what do we do?
Probably go back to manwich's suggestion.
Page 9 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News