re: Would you support a law that limited the number of children you could have?

If there ever was such a law, they'd surely have limited me to 0. I mean, the powers that be almost certainly have no interest in adding the genes of a mentally unstable dope fiend to the national pool.

So frick those people.

quote:

---

no, but I'd yank government assistance and make people suffer the consequences of their stupidity, after a while, things would take care of themselves.

---

Man, I can't believe a Jew would say something like this. Let children just die of starvation? Wow

The right to procreate is a fundamental right, highly unlikely that law would stand up in the Supreme Court

But I would support it

It would solve no problems and create a whole host of other problems. It is not in the least bit a feasible idea. Not to mention that overpopulation is not a current problem in this country. If you take out immigration then we are currently right around population sustaining levels.

Only a fool would support such a law.

quote:

---

The right to procreate is a fundamental right, highly unlikely that law would stand up in the Supreme Court

---

Correct to accomplish this reversing the tax rates would work. More children more taxes.

I think it just comes down to limiting government assistance. People who can afford the kids can have as many as they want. People who can't afford them now have less of a reason to have them.

quote:

---

Make a new system where you get welfare as long as you don't have kids, but lose your money if you do have them

---

Kafka for president

quote:

---

Make a new system where you get welfare as long as you don't have kids, but lose your money if you do have them

---

I was thinking like a "scholarship" for kids to be paid for not having babies until they're 18, at least.