- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would you rather be rich in a small, run down southern town or average in a nice city?
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:10 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:10 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
quote:
I would think most people would prefer being rich in a small town. Big fish in a little pond over being an average sized fish in an above average sized pond.
I don't understand this mentality unless your happiness is somehow dictated by how others perceive you.
So what is your happiness based on when living as an average fish in an above average size pond?
Personally I would be depressed living as an average fish in town. It's not being the bigger fish that makes me happy, it's not being surrounded by a bunch of average fish just like me that makes me happy. Why would I want to live in cookie cutter ville? Now if I truly have to live in that small town and can't be the nice house with the huge multi acerage lot on the edge of town, then both of these options are the same to me....miserable and depressing. I will gladly keep my beautiful/private acres of land I have now, 5 minutes away from the closest shitty little town, and make my 30 minute commute to Lafayette every day.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:15 pm to TDcline
Rich. Average in a shite hole big city sucks. You are just a number there.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:16 pm to ctiger69
quote:
Average in a shite hole big city sucks.
He just said a "nice" city, not necessarily big. Doesn't have to be NY or SF, and wouldn't be a shithole.
This post was edited on 3/20/18 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:16 pm to TDcline
Rich.
It's why there are cars and planes.
It's why there are cars and planes.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:18 pm to AbitaFan08
quote:
He just said a "nice" city, not necessarily big
Like Lafayette?
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:18 pm to HempHead
quote:
If A, why are you confined to the small town? It doesn't make any sense.
I interpreted the question to mean that you have the same amount of dollars in option A and B, but that $$ is considered to be rich in Option A while it's considered to be average in Option B.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:20 pm to VinegarStrokes
Yeah, I misread that. I'd still go with A, in my current situation, but that might change with kids in OP's scenario.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:20 pm to ctiger69
quote:
Like Lafayette?
If you consider Lafayette "nice" and a "city" then sure.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:20 pm to VinegarStrokes
quote:
I interpreted the question to mean that you have the same amount of dollars in option A and B, but that $$ is considered to be rich in Option A while it's considered to be average in Option B.
As I see it, if your "richness" in the small shitty town is only enough money to make you "average" in generic city suburb USA, it's not going to be enough "richness" to make shitty nowhere small town worthwhile in any relative fashion.
Although, depending on the generic city suburb, both options could likely suck about equally.
This post was edited on 3/20/18 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:21 pm to TDcline
I'll take rich any day. I can always get a private jet to a fine location
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:22 pm to TDcline
I am not driving more than 15 mins to work. If I can't afford the area to do that, then I'll relocate.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:23 pm to TDcline
Give me rich in the small town, especially if it's near the water.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:24 pm to rld280z
The options were not "average in a city" and "frick you money in a small town."
You're not flying private in either of the OP's scenarios.
You're not flying private in either of the OP's scenarios.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:24 pm to TDcline
I would pick the first one because it only specified that I had a wife, not kids. We could use the extra money to travel and do fun things together.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:27 pm to TDcline
I choose to be Brad Wesley everytime. It's good to be worshiped for bringing J.C. Penney to town.
Plus you get to share a girl with your son.

Plus you get to share a girl with your son.

Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:32 pm to TDcline
quote:
schools are absolutely terrible
quote:
Kids go to good public schools.
So the schools are terrible in both scenarios
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:36 pm to Packer
Not all public schools are Louisiana shitty ones
This post was edited on 3/20/18 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:37 pm to TH03
quote:
Not all public schools are Louisiana shitty ones
Nor did the OP specify that it had to be in Louisiana.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:38 pm to TDcline
quote:
rich in a small, run down southern town
quote:
You have to commute about 30 minutes to work
If I'm rich can't I just move my rich arse out of the sticks and live (according to you) happily ever after in the city?
Also, if I'm rich, why am I working?
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:40 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
As I see it, if your "richness" in the small shitty town is only enough money to make you "average" in generic city suburb USA, it's not going to be enough "richness" to make shitty nowhere small town worthwhile in any relative fashion.
Yeah the money that makes you average in the suburb isn't going to be rich by any definition unless your neighbors are trailer trash. So yeah you might have a nice 5000sqft house on a $1000 a month mortgage, but when you want to go out to eat or grab a beer, it's at the run down bar where you have more teeth that the other patrons combines.
Popular
Back to top


0










