Started By
Message

re: Would our founding fathers be proud of America as it is today?

Posted on 6/27/20 at 2:59 pm to
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
3269 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

We also burned people at the stake because we thought they might be witches hundreds of years ago.




Burning witches at the stake didnt happen in the colonies.
Posted by Chuck Barris
Member since Apr 2013
3408 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

While it is accurate that some people were second class citizens, that was more a symptom of the time rather than the personal beliefs of the individuals who founded this country.
"I can't believe you're holding me as a slave, you sold my child away, and you murdered my wife for trying to escape!"

"It's just a symptom of our time. What am I supposed to do?" :cracks whip:
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216685 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

They weren’t building a government to be a beacon of light for 250 years,



Yes they were....




quote:

they just didn’t want to be told what to do by the British anymore




You must have got an "F" in history in high school...………….
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
159142 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Burning witches at the stake didnt happen in the colonies
They were just HANGED

Ain't nobody pickin' my nits on that one
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
66934 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:01 pm to
I think they would be most horrified by how vulgar and twisted everything has become. I don't think they'd get over that long enough to discuss any other issue with them.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
53839 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

There's actually been an enormous expansion of rights over the centuries, what with the whole expansion of voting rights to women, ending of slavery, and decriminalization of LGBT sexual activity.

There have been far more rights taken away than granted. The federal government should protect the constitution, the bill of rights, negotiate/deal with foreign governments, settle disputes between states and pretty much nothing else. The states should otherwise be nearly autonomous.
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61886 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

I almost didn’t say Lincoln because I didn’t want the whole slave thing to come up, but Lincoln was one of, if not the, closest presidents we’ve had to a dictatorship. He suspended habeas corpus and hung journalist who spoke against him. If that isn’t against everything in the Bill of Rights, nothing is.



Ignorant people, and/or people with an agenda are going to make silly arguments, but I knew exactly what you meant, and you’re right. I think Jefferson would object even more so to Lincoln mustering troops to invade the south and completely ignoring the right to self determination which founded this country.


Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:03 pm to
If they could see America in 2020, The odds would be 50/50 on the framers establishing a hereditary fascist monarchy that would maintain the America they envisioned.

Or the framers of the Constitution would’ve established a constitution with strict immigration controls with significant fortifications on the border to be continually updated and would’ve likely outright forbidden all immigration, possibly made sure Balkanization has a legal mechanism like we sorely needed in the civil war to do so. They definitely would have wrote amendments expressly forbidding a central bank and required a balanced budget every single year.
This post was edited on 6/27/20 at 3:13 pm
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
3269 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Ha not even close. I was just making a point. They weren’t building a government to be a beacon of light for 250 years, they just didn’t want to be told what to do by the British anymore


And i agree with that. It goes a little deeper than they were all for the status quo. There were several opposed to slavery but knew the whole fricking thing would fall apart if outlawed. Call it a nessesarry evil if you wish. But it wasnt like all those men were out for themselves.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

I think Jefferson would object even more so to Lincoln mustering troops to invade the south and completely ignoring the right to self determination which founded this country.


The civil war went against everything as to what for and why we rebelled against the British Crown.

The civil war was the birth of the modern American federal government as we know it today.
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
3269 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Ain't nobody pickin' my nits on that one


Ill pick your nits. Lol

Which would you choose?

Burned alive?

Or the noose?

There is quite a bit of difference when you think about it. Guilt or not.
Posted by Zachary
Member since Jan 2007
2019 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:17 pm to
"Self-interest"? If by "self-interest" you mean freedom from tyranny, then okay, but otherwise their decision to declare independence was a decision more dangerous than you can imagine, as it was treason. It was, in many respects, contrary to their self-interests. In those days it was difficult to tell whether your neighbor subscribed to your views or was a loyalist who would turn you in to the Crown. "We must all hang together or, most certainly, we shall hang separately," was the quote, I believe. And holding the state delegations together to vote to declare independence was hardly a sure thing. They were not a monolithic voting block.
They had widely varying interests, including slavery in the South. Slavery was not pressed in the discussion of declaring independence from Britain because the already-tenuous coalition to declare independence would have fallen apart. I suggest reading Founding Brothers and John Adams.
Posted by Spankum
The Sip
Member since Jan 2007
63359 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:24 pm to
I know this is not the answer you were looking for, but yes...I think the founding fathers would be mighty proud of what this country has become. They were dealinf]g with all the samp problems back then as we are now. Tribalism ,racism, imperialism, and political strife were all issues back then just as they are now. Can you imagine the shite that was going on when there was stirrings of the revolution?
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
36335 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:29 pm to
Jefferson would not like how the civil war turned out. Washington and Hamilton would be okay with it.

But let’s be honest, they wouldn’t be able to process life in modern day America. The fact that there are cars, telephones, microwaves, televisions, 50 states from coast to coast, cell phones, the internet, airplanes, air conditioning, electricity, sanitation, space travel, indoor plumbing, etc. etc. etc. would blow their minds. And they’d be all for people protesting as they did plenty of that back then. They would probably be proud of how far we’ve come with technology and human rights. Ben Franklin would love all the technology, especially birth control and penicillin.

That’s if we’re being honest and not a bunch of snowflakes.
Posted by BatonrougeCajun
Somewhere in Texas
Member since Feb 2008
7656 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

You must have got an "F" in history in high school


Well I have a degree in history and have been teaching it for 11 years so.....
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46784 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Well I have a degree in history and have been teaching it for 11 years so.....


Then along with whatever history books you read you might want to try reading the Federalist Papers, Anti-Federalist Papers, and the various correspondence between the founding fathers.

Because in all those documents, the founders were pretty clear on what they were doing, and why, to include the various philosophers of the time who influenced their views.

This post was edited on 6/27/20 at 3:58 pm
Posted by BatonrougeCajun
Somewhere in Texas
Member since Feb 2008
7656 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 4:03 pm to
I’ve read all of it, extensively. When trying to win support making the most passionate argument is a good play
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
12784 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 4:08 pm to
Yes. One could argue they saw just the same
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46784 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

I’ve read all of it, extensively.


You've read all of it "extensively" and you're still making the claim the only reason they founded this country on the principles they did was because they didn't want to be ruled by the British?

Posted by BatonrougeCajun
Somewhere in Texas
Member since Feb 2008
7656 posts
Posted on 6/27/20 at 4:09 pm to
Yes, pretty much. They felt like they should rule themselves. Are you arguing that?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram