- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would a move to the Atlanta metro be a lateral move from south LA?
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:41 am to lsupride87
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:41 am to lsupride87
quote:
However, that is remarkable considering BRs metro population is 830k and ATL is 5.5 million
This times 1000. If the two cities are in the same breath when referring to traffic, you know LA has failed you. This place sucks and I’m ready to jet ASAP.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:42 am to lsupride87
quote:
However, that is remarkable considering BRs metro population is 830k and ATL is 5.5 million
A lot of mid sized cities have growing pains and difficulties adopting new means of transportation....
....but the fact that the decking for I-10 hasn’t been updated in 70 years in the heart of Baton Rouge is insane. The metro has grown 8 times over in size in that time frame and truck traffic has grown even more.
It’s like the state and federal government have been openly hostile to the Baton Rouge region’s infrastructure needs for decades.
They could improve traffic massively by just adding lanes on I-10 and Airline Highway. It’s been needed for 30 years. It’s a relatively simple fix and Louisiana still can’t get it done. A loop or commuter rail is just too complex for Louisiana.
This post was edited on 7/24/18 at 9:47 am
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:43 am to TH03
I mean the top 15 is remarkable
A bunch of huge cities and fricking Baton Rouge
1 Los Angeles
2 San Fran
3. NYC
4. Seattle
5. San Jose'
6. Miami
7. Portland
8. Honolulu
9. Boston
10. DC
11. San Diego
12. Atlanta
13. Baton Rouge
14. Chicago
15. Austin
A bunch of huge cities and fricking Baton Rouge
1 Los Angeles
2 San Fran
3. NYC
4. Seattle
5. San Jose'
6. Miami
7. Portland
8. Honolulu
9. Boston
10. DC
11. San Diego
12. Atlanta
13. Baton Rouge
14. Chicago
15. Austin
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:45 am to member12
quote:
It’s like the state and federal government
The state government is incompetent and can’t run the state the way it should be ran. It’s no mystery why the brightest and best are leaving the state for better opportunities. They don’t give us good reasons to stay.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:45 am to tigerinthebueche
It’s really not that bad. The metro is 7.4 million, and it’s all spread out. There’s going to be traffic. There are so many different roads to take to avoid major highways when congestion gets too bad or there’s a wreck. Plenty of north/south and east/west roads to take.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:45 am to member12
It all depends on where you would be working and your commute. I live near Canton/Woodstock in Cherokee county which is north of Atlanta and on the 75/575 corridor and I love it up here. The traffic here is getting worse due to more subdivisions, people and more shopping centers. The public school system here is good and I would recommend this area to anyone. I like being far enough away from Atlanta but if we want to do something in Atlanta we are only 30+ mins away. Atlanta is so big and so spread out anywhere you want to go will take you a minimum of 30 mins.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:47 am to member12
the issue Atlanta has traffic wise, since we are discussing that, is that people are moving there in droves and they simply can't keep up. They've approved funding, as my link describes, but it is going to be 10 or so years before that work is completed.
BR on the other hand is just an infrastructure nightmare and I've no doubt it will stay that way for the next 1000 years.
BR on the other hand is just an infrastructure nightmare and I've no doubt it will stay that way for the next 1000 years.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:48 am to TH03
quote:
It’s really not that bad. The metro is 7.4 million, and it’s all spread out. There’s going to be traffic. There are so many different roads to take to avoid major highways when congestion gets too bad or there’s a wreck. Plenty of north/south and east/west roads to take.
Bingo. Our major cities on LA have little to none of these. No service roads. No alternative routes that aren’t 30 Miles out of the way. It’s a joke. Your choice is sit in the gridlock for an hour or two until they move the wreck or go 30-45 Miles extra to possibly avoid any issues. Such a pathetic way to live
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:49 am to OKTGR580
Yeah I can take different roads to anywhere in the metro area pretty much without getting on the major highways/interstates. DFW was built primarily on a grid.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:49 am to cas4t
The only way BR traffic will change is if 500,000 people magically disappeared overnight and hundreds of thousands of people every day stopped using I-10 as their main route to get around. That’s all a big IF too.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:51 am to OKTGR580
quote:
Bingo. Our major cities on LA have little to none of these. No service roads. No alternative routes that aren’t 30 Miles out of the way. It’s a joke. Your choice is sit in the gridlock for an hour or two until they move the wreck or go 30-45 Miles extra to possibly avoid any issues. Such a pathetic way to live
could not agree more. But it is important to note that Atlanta doesn't offer similar alternative routes like DFW. They're coming, which is nice, but it's going to be a while.
But let's be clear- I'd leave BR for Atlanta in a millisecond.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:51 am to TH03
See it’s simple things like that that attract me to these places. If there’s a wreck on I-35, you have 3 or 4 other options to get where you’re going.
Not the case in the cities here in LA. If there’s a wreck on an interstate here, you’re pretty much stuck waiting
Not the case in the cities here in LA. If there’s a wreck on an interstate here, you’re pretty much stuck waiting
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:51 am to cas4t
quote:
They've approved funding, as my link describes, but it is going to be 10 or so years before that work is completed.
The only current major problem is 285 and its under construction right now and has been for the last year, it wont be 10 years
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:52 am to cas4t
Dfw is unique with its roads. Loops out the arse and the whole thing is a grid. 
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:52 am to OKTGR580
The suburbs are solid but there has been a lot of turnover and some of the "good" suburbs are no longer very good.
In my view, maybe because I'm getting older and more interested in school systems and areas, is that the "good suburbs" are contracting. East Cobb, Roswell, Alpharetta are the safe locations for good public schools. But because people don't view Gwinnett like they used to, or may not want to go out to Cherokee or Forsyth, those areas are pretty expensive.
Of course, part of this depends on what you're looking for. If you want a safe school where most of your kids' friends will go to college, that's a ton of schools in the metro. If you want a school with invested families where a lot of kids are going to bigger universities rather than in state directional-type schools, there are fewer options. In my estimation, this has more to do with how "established" a school is, and how established the area is. Hence, you probably have more families sending kids to Tech//UGA/Vanderbilt from Walton than from a Forsyth County school, even though the latter is fine for most purposes.
Not sure if you care about that stuff, but it drives demand and pricing, so it makes sense to think about even if you don't care about schools right now.
In my view, maybe because I'm getting older and more interested in school systems and areas, is that the "good suburbs" are contracting. East Cobb, Roswell, Alpharetta are the safe locations for good public schools. But because people don't view Gwinnett like they used to, or may not want to go out to Cherokee or Forsyth, those areas are pretty expensive.
Of course, part of this depends on what you're looking for. If you want a safe school where most of your kids' friends will go to college, that's a ton of schools in the metro. If you want a school with invested families where a lot of kids are going to bigger universities rather than in state directional-type schools, there are fewer options. In my estimation, this has more to do with how "established" a school is, and how established the area is. Hence, you probably have more families sending kids to Tech//UGA/Vanderbilt from Walton than from a Forsyth County school, even though the latter is fine for most purposes.
Not sure if you care about that stuff, but it drives demand and pricing, so it makes sense to think about even if you don't care about schools right now.
This post was edited on 7/24/18 at 10:16 am
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:53 am to cas4t
Yep. I used to think Br wasn’t that bad. Then I started seeing it for what it really is and compared it to other cities in the region and it’s pathetic. Once I got outside of my LSU bubble, I learned quick.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:53 am to OKTGR580
quote:Another IF: if LOMV stops giving drivers licenses to morons.
That’s all a big IF too.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:55 am to TH03
quote:
Dfw is unique with its roads. Loops out the arse and the whole thing is a grid.
Yeah DFW is far better in this regard
OP want to eliminate the risk of horrific traffic? Live where you work, or coordinate a reverse commute.
I'll take ITP traffic 10/10 times over the haul in/out from Cobb/Forsyth/etc.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:55 am to NYCAuburn
Have they finalized the I75 express lanes? I haven't made the drive in a while.
eta reading they should be done by this summer, which is obviously now. This correct? If so, that's fricking sweet.
eta reading they should be done by this summer, which is obviously now. This correct? If so, that's fricking sweet.
This post was edited on 7/24/18 at 9:57 am
Posted on 7/24/18 at 9:55 am to cas4t
quote:
But it is important to note that Atlanta doesn't offer similar alternative routes like DFW.
Coming from the north side, if you dont want to take 400, 85, 75, you have plenty of options to get into the city and not get on the highway. However unless you live very close(like right next to them) to those options the highways are really better. You have anywhere from 4-8 lanes each direction to move. In the morning, the crawl is still 25-45 mph usually on highways. Thats not bad by any means
Popular
Back to top


0








