- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woman being sued for defamation for false rape claim
Posted on 9/17/23 at 11:45 am to GeauxxxTigers23
Posted on 9/17/23 at 11:45 am to GeauxxxTigers23
The drumhead Nazi tribunals and Stalinist proceedings have more credibility than the Title IX cases.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 11:45 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
But more often, it is faked.
That's NOT true at all.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 11:48 am to GeauxxxTigers23
I've always said that with rape and child molestation/sex claims that are proven false the false accuser should have to spend the amount of time in prison that the falsely accused would have gotten.
That would cut false accusations down real quick like.
I know a guy with a vindictive ex-wife who put her daughter up to saying her dad molested her. She got him arrested and his name was plastered across papers and news. It was 100% bullshite and the daughter eventually came out and said as much.
The miserable twat that is his ex-wife should be in prison as I type this.
That would cut false accusations down real quick like.
I know a guy with a vindictive ex-wife who put her daughter up to saying her dad molested her. She got him arrested and his name was plastered across papers and news. It was 100% bullshite and the daughter eventually came out and said as much.
The miserable twat that is his ex-wife should be in prison as I type this.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 11:50 am to Klark Kent
quote:
bad troll or just ignorance, considering the OP
quote:
Jury finds Trump liable for sexual abuse, awards accuser $5M
LINK
Posted on 9/17/23 at 11:53 am to Joshjrn
quote:
the state was required to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Explain how Danny Masterson got convicted lol
Posted on 9/17/23 at 11:55 am to 777Tiger
quote:
She should have to serve whatever time he would’ve gotten if convicted.
quote:
yep
Exactly
Posted on 9/17/23 at 11:58 am to JodyPlauche
aren’t you on of the posters that cries regularly about PT related posts on the OT?
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:29 pm to Klark Kent
Not to piggy back on the topic... But was Zyahna Bryant (Dove soap) ever sued for false allegations of racism? The UVA student Morgan Bettinger was expelled from college because of these false accusations. If I was the girl I would have sued the shite out of the whatever you call it..
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:31 pm to Tyga Woods
quote:
She should have to serve whatever time he would’ve gotten if convicted.
How much time do you think the Brown/Goldman families deserve for OJ being found not guilty?
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:39 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
The Khan hearing was governed by Obama-era guidance, which discouraged cross-examination. In 2020, the Trump administration reversed those guidelines and mandated the practice.
But we have grown men who voted for Biden bc of mean tweets.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:40 pm to Hester Carries
quote:
Explain how Danny Masterson got convicted lol
As a rule, I don't follow pop culture trials, so I honestly have no idea.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:42 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
How much time do you think the Brown/Goldman families deserve for OJ being found not guilty?
Did the Brown Goldman families go to the police and accuse OJ of a crime for which there was no evidence? Silly comparison
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:44 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
Mr. Khan and his lawyer were not allowed in the room with the panel. Nor could his lawyer, under the rules of the hearing, cross-examine her. meet the modern day HR, anonymous accusations, guilty until proven innocent
Even in the reign of Henry VIII, a monster who routinely had wives and political opponents beheaded, a charge of treason required the direct testimony of two accusers.
This post was edited on 9/17/23 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:46 pm to MoarKilometers
Well, they easily won the civil suit, so I would say "0".
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:47 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Did the Brown Goldman families go to the police and accuse OJ of a crime for which there was no evidence? Silly comparison
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:51 pm to JodyPlauche
quote:
But more often, it is faked.
That's NOT true at all.
More often is probably an overstatement but often is not.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:51 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
How much time do you think the Brown/Goldman families deserve for OJ being found not guilty?
The police and evidence made him a suspect, not the Brown/Goldman families.
He was found responsible in the civil trial.
Trying to compare the OJ situation to a false rape accusation is stupid. Respectfully.
This post was edited on 9/17/23 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:55 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
How much time do you think the Brown/Goldman families deserve for OJ being found not guilty?
There is a difference between a jury reaching a not guilty verdict and allegations that are outright proven to be completely fabricated for the sole purpose of damaging someone's reputation or making them lose their freedom. Equating the two is just dumb.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:55 pm to biglego
quote:
Even in the reign of Henry VIII, a monster who routinely had wives and political opponents beheaded, a charge of treason required the direct testimony of two accusers.
I’m pretty sure universities could still expel students at their leisure, so this is a bit of an odd comparison.
Posted on 9/17/23 at 12:58 pm to JodyPlauche
quote:
That's NOT true at all.
Lately it feels like it, but I'm also viewing it as someone who was falsely accused of sexual harassment.
Popular
Back to top


0






