- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will Smith Murder Trial-Guilty of manslaughter and attempted manslaughter
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:37 pm to Nado Jenkins83
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:37 pm to Nado Jenkins83
Agree to disagree
The public first saw the incident just like they did joe mcknight's... a road rage incident that went too far. then, as more evidence surfaced.........
There's an interesting parallel there
If you had to guess, what percentage of the people calling for Gasser's head were the same ones calling for Hayes' initially?
The public first saw the incident just like they did joe mcknight's... a road rage incident that went too far. then, as more evidence surfaced.........
There's an interesting parallel there
If you had to guess, what percentage of the people calling for Gasser's head were the same ones calling for Hayes' initially?
This post was edited on 12/7/16 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:37 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
weird, i've seen and been arguing against a bunch of thin air i guess this whole time.
Chad, you would argue with a woman sucking on your penis.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:38 pm to Nado Jenkins83
Fuller is going all in on Hernandez
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:38 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Ken Daley ?@Ken_Daley 33s33 seconds ago Fuller: "And who’s party was Richard Hernandez in? The Smith party, right?” @Pierre_Thomas: “Yes” #CardellHayes #WillSmith @NOLANews 0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes Reply Retweet Like More Ken Daley ?@Ken_Daley 2m2 minutes ago Fuller screams at Thomas: “Did you ever consider that if not for the actions of Richard Hernandez, Racquel Smith might have her husband?"
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:40 pm to Nado Jenkins83
I don't get that? What did Hernandez's and o Neil's situation have to do with smith getting shot
That's a dickhead move
That's a dickhead move
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:41 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Ceravolo wasn't on the scene per surveillance cameras of the hotel at the time.
Are you saying Ceravolo was never at the scene?
Because you are wrong. He admits to being at the scene but says he was only comforting Racquel Smith.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:41 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
I don't get that? What did Hernandez's and o Neil's situation have to do with smith getting shot
That's a dickhead move
don't jump to conclusions. it may tie in with other questions later.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:42 pm to TigerFred
quote:
Are you saying Ceravolo was never at the scene?
Because you are wrong. He admits to being at the scene but says he was only comforting Racquel Smith.
someone with NOPD says he looked in SUV but never got within 6 feet. whatever that means
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:42 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
Ken Daley ?@Ken_Daley 2m2 minutes ago Thomas: Couldn’t hear words between #WillSmith & #CardellHayes, but heard Racquel say, “No, Will, we have the children. It’s not worth it."
this could be when/if will said he is getting his gun
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:43 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
I don't get that? What did Hernandez's and o Neil's situation have to do with smith getting shot
That's a dickhead move
they are building on the narrative that smith and hernandez and the other guy started the confrontation outside of the vehicles.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:43 pm to Nado Jenkins83
Well according to Pierre, WS and CH's situation had died down and he (Pierre) was trying to see what was going on with shirtless pelè and O'Neil, then BANG
BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG
BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG
This post was edited on 12/7/16 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:43 pm to TigerFred
quote:He was with Pierre I believe
Are you saying Ceravolo was never at the scene?
Because you are wrong. He admits to being at the scene but says he was only comforting Racquel Smith.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:44 pm to ForeverLSU02
quote:
He was with Pierre I believe
no, he wasnt. he cae back after PT called him and he was def there because there are pics of him talking to cops.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:45 pm to TigerFred
quote:
Are you saying Ceravolo was never at the scene?
not within minutes post accident like it was speculated when evidence could have been tampered with.
And the report was that there was no visible signs of a gun in the car, they purposefully don't search the vehicle till proper steps taken. It's humorous you find that point as some sort of validity of corruption.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:47 pm to diat150
quote:Gotcha. Thanks for clarifying
no, he wasnt. he cae back after PT called him and he was def there because there are pics of him talking to cops.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:47 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
And the report was that there was no visible signs of a gun in the car,
how could that be when the gun was between the drivers seat and console?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:48 pm to diat150
quote:
how could that be when the gun was between the drivers seat and console?
kind of my point. they hadn't performed a search of the vehicle.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:50 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
kind of my point. they hadn't performed a search of the vehicle.
they took smiths body out of the car. at that point it would have been clearly visible. no way they wouldnt have seen it.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:52 pm to diat150
quote:
they took smiths body out of the car. at that point it would have been clearly visible. no way they wouldnt have seen it.
something black wedged in a deep dark crevice isn't clearly visible
Posted on 12/7/16 at 2:54 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
something black wedged in a deep dark crevice isn't clearly visible
thats not what she said.
Popular
Back to top


0





