- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will Smith Murder Trial-Guilty of manslaughter and attempted manslaughter
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:09 pm to lsuhunt555
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:09 pm to lsuhunt555
quote:
This is stupid logic. If I get into an argument with a stranger my wife won't be concerned about the other person because she has no control over that person. Shell be concerned about me, because she has more control.
Agreed, definitely throwing shite at the wall with that one.
0
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:10 pm to Coeur du Tigre
Doh
This post was edited on 12/7/16 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:10 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
This is interesting to me
Agree with this. I just have a hard time understanding why so many seem to be siding with the guy who, from at least most accounts, killed an unarmed man. I now this board has a tendency to be contrarian, but this is a little much.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:10 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Those who argue this don't know that Murder 2 in LA has a different definition than most other states and is fine for this case.
If you think its manslaughter, you think its murder 2. There's no difference in the present facts.
He either acted in reasonable self-defense or he didn't.
If he did, you think he gets off. If he didn't, Murder 2 is the charge.
Once again, I'm not a lawyer, but I don't think you are correct. The jury can cite "heat of passion" to get it down to a manslaughter from Murder 2.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:10 pm to lsuhunt555
I've been keeping up with the WWL twitter timeline on today's testimony and it's fricking mindboggling that this river trash fgt Hernandez got Will Smith killed.
FWIW, Pierre just confirmed that this pussy ran and left his wife and his friends as soon as he heard gunshots.
FWIW, Pierre just confirmed that this pussy ran and left his wife and his friends as soon as he heard gunshots.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:11 pm to lsuhunt555
quote:
This is stupid logic. If I get into an argument with a stranger my wife won't be concerned about the other person because she has no control over that person. Shell be concerned about me, because she has more control.
maybe she had seen him act in a hostile way before and make a bad decision?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:12 pm to lsuhunt555
It's just a mini facebook here
People rush to be opinionated instead of educated (not talking about anyone specifically that's been in this thread) and that's why I come asking questions instead of flopping my dick on the table like I'm a big shot
People rush to be opinionated instead of educated (not talking about anyone specifically that's been in this thread) and that's why I come asking questions instead of flopping my dick on the table like I'm a big shot
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:12 pm to diat150
So the point of his post went straight over your head?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:12 pm to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
tell us again what you saw that night
Have you ever testified?
Opposing counsel tries to confuse and twist what you say.
what does chad's rehashed bs have to do with that?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:12 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:That's unfortunate. Some of actually appreciate your input
I'm just going to withdraw from this before I say something I regret.
Ya'll have fun.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:13 pm to Zach Lee To Amp Hill
Can you link that timeline for me please
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:13 pm to lsuhunt555
quote:
Agree with this. I just have a hard time understanding why so many seem to be siding with the guy who, from at least most accounts, killed an unarmed man. I now this board has a tendency to be contrarian, but this is a little much.
there is no rule that says someone has to be armed in a self defense case.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:14 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
So the point of his post went straight over your head?
no, it went over your head.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:14 pm to TigahJay
quote:
Once again, I'm not a lawyer, but I don't think you are correct. The jury can cite "heat of passion" to get it down to a manslaughter from Murder 2.
All Murder 2 requires is a homicide and specific intent to kill. Shooting someone in the back 7 times would be specific intent to kill.
There's nothing in the statute that covers premeditation or anything like that anymore.
Its a source of confusion.
Manslaughter is a catch all for passion crimes or no specific intent to kill.
In the present case, Hayes could be charged with either and its fine. That is common.
They maybe should have gone with manslaughter to avoid confusion but its perfectly fine in this case in reality.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:14 pm to diat150
That's just an outstanding response.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:15 pm to LNCHBOX
That's just an outstanding response.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:15 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
That's just an outstanding response.
perhaps someone should drag you by your hair so you can better understand.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:15 pm to diat150
What in the actual frick is going on around here? 
This post was edited on 12/7/16 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:17 pm to diat150
I'm sure you think you're making a point here. Congrats I guess.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 1:17 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
People rush to be opinionated instead of educated (not talking about anyone specifically that's been in this thread) and that's why I come asking questions instead of flopping my dick on the table like I'm a big shot
people still do this on the OT? Hadn't noticed.
Page 64 of 248
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News