- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/10/17 at 9:47 am to slackster
quote:
People bitch about reliability when their in-car Wi-Fi won't work
I remember years ago Mercedes having reliability issues and it was because of the huge amount of new technology and options they were shoving into cars.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 9:48 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
Toyota, Mercedes,BMW, Honda,Hyundai, etc ALL build cars right here in the US.
They are not designed and engineered in the US.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 9:48 am to GEAUXT
Vehicles are routinely getting 200k on them without major malfunction. That's pretty damned good. For perspective, that's driving coast to coast almost 100 times. I think people are just a lot more spoiled now.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 9:57 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
They are not designed and engineered in the US.
I think most of them are. Toyota has design and engineering in the US, and I think BMW does as well.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 9:58 am to GEAUXT
I don't agree with the premise. Most cars are more reliable than ever save a few brands (Chrysler) The 70's and 80's produced some really crappy vehicles.
The deal is all manf will have certain amount of defects. (not possible to avoid) The difference is the consumer who experiences the defects have a much larger platform in which to bitch on.
For instance, if a one or two guys posted here they had a tranny go out on a F-150, thousands of people would read that and take away that ford tranny's must suck.
The various auto forums are something that really amplify the unsatisfied owners voices.
The deal is all manf will have certain amount of defects. (not possible to avoid) The difference is the consumer who experiences the defects have a much larger platform in which to bitch on.
For instance, if a one or two guys posted here they had a tranny go out on a F-150, thousands of people would read that and take away that ford tranny's must suck.
The various auto forums are something that really amplify the unsatisfied owners voices.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 9:58 am to slackster
I use a similar analogy. I use the Land Rover v the Landcruiser.
Most Whirlpools(including Kenmore, Maytag, Amana, Roper, etc) and Speed Queens were tossed because the wife wanted a nicer looking machine.
Most Samsungs and LGs that are tossed (and new post 2009 Whirlpools) are tossed because they broke and would cost more to fix than to replace (60% of new unit cost is generally the most anyone will pay for repair, 75% for the cheap whirlpools).
Cars are the same way. The ones we see the most reliable are also the ones that take longer to adapt.
Historically that's the point of Maytag. They marketed themselves as the old reliable units.
Speed Queen rarely markets at all.
As a whole though the auto industry is better not worse. Like mentioned before a modern KIA, is likely more reliable than a 2000 model car of any type. You could take a 2000 Kia and say that about a 1980 car as well. It's crazy to think about. We do in many ways let nostalgia blind us. How many transmission changes did Gramps old Chevy have anyway?
Most Whirlpools(including Kenmore, Maytag, Amana, Roper, etc) and Speed Queens were tossed because the wife wanted a nicer looking machine.
Most Samsungs and LGs that are tossed (and new post 2009 Whirlpools) are tossed because they broke and would cost more to fix than to replace (60% of new unit cost is generally the most anyone will pay for repair, 75% for the cheap whirlpools).
Cars are the same way. The ones we see the most reliable are also the ones that take longer to adapt.
Historically that's the point of Maytag. They marketed themselves as the old reliable units.
Speed Queen rarely markets at all.
As a whole though the auto industry is better not worse. Like mentioned before a modern KIA, is likely more reliable than a 2000 model car of any type. You could take a 2000 Kia and say that about a 1980 car as well. It's crazy to think about. We do in many ways let nostalgia blind us. How many transmission changes did Gramps old Chevy have anyway?
Posted on 11/10/17 at 10:00 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
They are not designed and engineered in the US.
Not entirely true. Toyota, Nissan, and Honda especially do a lot of design and engineering in the US. Most of them are even built here.
Rumor is that Toyota's next plant will be in western Tennessee.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 10:09 am to Tigeralum2008
quote:
Cylinder shutoff at idle
Jeez this sucks so bad. Had a loaner 2017 F150 EcoBoost while I had some work being done on my car back in January and I swear this shite freaked me out everytime I stopped. It's really nerve-racking when you need to cross a busy 4 lane highway. Had me wondering if the truck was going to stall each time I started to hit the gas to shoot across.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 10:19 am to BHM
quote:
My first new car was a brand new shiny blue 85 Grand Am. It is why I have driven Nissan vehicles ever since.
I see signs like this at all local automatic car washes. Notice the middle section...
This post was edited on 11/10/17 at 10:20 am
Posted on 11/10/17 at 10:21 am to tigerpimpbot
quote:
American Unions
Yep, the UAW almost destroyed the American Car...
It's when they got the frick out of Detroit is when the vehicles improved..
Posted on 11/10/17 at 10:22 am to S1C EM
UHAUL won't rent a trailer to you if the tow vehicle is a Ford Explorer.
Why is that?
Why is that?
Posted on 11/10/17 at 10:27 am to member12
quote:
UHAUL won't rent a trailer to you if the tow vehicle is a Ford Explorer.
I think that's if you have the hitch on the bumper...
Posted on 11/10/17 at 10:28 am to Hangover Haven
quote:
I think that's if you have the hitch on the bumper...
Last time I rented a UHAUL trailer, the printed in the contract that their trailers are not to be towed by any Ford Explorer.
quote:LINK
“U-Haul has chosen not to rent behind this tow vehicle based on our history of excessive costs in defending lawsuits involving Ford Explorer towing combinations. This policy is not related to safety issues. This is an unusual circumstance for U-Haul—we have built our success for over 60 years by saying ‘yes’ to our customers. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause and are committed to working with our customers to find alternative options to help with their move.”
This post was edited on 11/10/17 at 10:30 am
Posted on 11/10/17 at 10:31 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
Chyrsler products have been either Mercedes or Fiat based for the last 15 years, and neither of those brands have a reputation for poor quality.
You sure about that, boss? Both of those brands generally sit near the bottom of most lists for reliability, albeit Fiat MUCH closer to the bottom.
quote:
Maybe just maybe the Chrysler reputation is based on pre 2000s cars, in fact they are for sure.
Yes and no. Yes, their reputation prior to 2000 was putrid and some of that, no doubt, has carried over and remained ingrained in the minds of buyers. But their new models and designs are all evaluated against the competition by independent reviewers every year and they still place at the bottom of most categories, without fail.
quote:
Chrysler builds cars that will last 100K miles easily just as all other major manufacturers do.
Of course they do, as do pretty much all manufacturers. However, their failure rates are still significantly higher per specified number of units produced versus other makes.
It's not some big setup against Chrysler products. Save for the Ram and the higher-end Jeeps, they are widely acknowledged as one of the least reliable brands on the market.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 10:32 am to member12
I don't know, I know many of the older models bumpers would fail if the hitch was on it.. I don't think they even have that option anymore..
You can only put a receiver hitch on the Newer model Explorers now..
quote:
If you own a 2011 Ford Explorer or newer, you can rent a U-Haul towing dolly or trailer.
quote:
If you own a 2010 Ford Explorer or older, you can’t rent a U-Haul towing dolly or trailer.
You can only put a receiver hitch on the Newer model Explorers now..
This post was edited on 11/10/17 at 10:38 am
Posted on 11/10/17 at 10:36 am to S1C EM
quote:
Save for the Ram
The Ram is the shittiest truck on the market.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 10:43 am to member12
because they had some stupid wheel related re-call years ago and U-haul made that rule and never backed down. My parents had a sport track back then.
I have always lied when renting trailers from U-haul. I needed to tow a Caddilac Deville with a Tacoma. even when I said the pulling vehicle was a F-350 it said no-go.
So I said I was towing a Model-A and it let me get it with the Tacoma.
Then I slowly pulled a Car bigger and heavier than my truck home 375 miles in 9+hours.
(with an Explorer they won't rent at all, have to pick up and drop off with something else.)
I have always lied when renting trailers from U-haul. I needed to tow a Caddilac Deville with a Tacoma. even when I said the pulling vehicle was a F-350 it said no-go.
So I said I was towing a Model-A and it let me get it with the Tacoma.
Then I slowly pulled a Car bigger and heavier than my truck home 375 miles in 9+hours.
(with an Explorer they won't rent at all, have to pick up and drop off with something else.)
Posted on 11/10/17 at 10:46 am to yellowfin
quote:
The Ram is the shittiest truck on the market.
Against other trucks, it's still at the bottom of most rankings. But trucks tend to be different animals in that they are generally pretty reliable even when made by a mostly unreliable brand. GM also comes to mind here, though they have been better across the board in the last few years.
Popular
Back to top


1







