- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are there still so many unreliable car brands?
Posted on 11/10/17 at 12:26 pm to Tigeralum2008
Posted on 11/10/17 at 12:26 pm to Tigeralum2008
quote:
Many of the "issues" in today's modern car are related to the drive for higher fuel efficiency.
8 speed CVT's
turbo'd V6 trucks
Polution control sensors
Cylinder shutoff at idle
Agree. But again, the Japanese figured this out many years ago. See, Honda CRX HF. 50+ mpg reported frequently.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 12:28 pm to LSUwag
I may just be lucky but I've owned Jeep, Ford, Chevy, and Honda and I've never had a major problem with any of them.
Changing alternator on a couple is probaly the most expensive repair I've done to any of them
Changing alternator on a couple is probaly the most expensive repair I've done to any of them
Posted on 11/10/17 at 12:39 pm to keakar
quote:
if you are smart, its better to find a 70's -80's truck, or even a 90's truck, and do a frame off restoration like new with a new crate ebngine and trany for $50k and you have 1000 times better built and better value truck
This is so true and true of anything. People talk of OEM quality but its really dependent on what aftermarket part your comparing it to. Name brand aftermarket manufacturers are producing low volume and high quality to attract the consumer directly and each part has to stand on its own merit and the price point is higher. OEM parts are hidden in the total package and they are produced under extreme price pressure by the auto manufacturer.
All that said, I generally recommend OEM parts because most people dont buy the higher quality aftermarket brands. They go to AutoZone and buy chinese crap that is way worse than OEM.
Example of what you are referencing. I bought a used up 18' center console hull and striped it clean. I extensively researched and compared every single part and designed every system of the rebuild and in the end I got a boat that was of much greater quality than if I bought a new and completed ready-to-roll product(boat) and I got it much cheaper and most importantly I got it EXACTLY the way I want.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 12:41 pm to nola000
quote:
Agree. But again, the Japanese figured this out many years ago. See, Honda CRX HF. 50+ mpg reported frequently.
We had a Nissan altima that had the cvt go out with 63k on it. Costs twice as much as a regular transmission with very little benefit.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 12:44 pm to GEAUXT
Capitalism
The desire for profits trumps all else
Quality control is expensive and not worth the investment
Stay safe capitalism drones
The desire for profits trumps all else
Quality control is expensive and not worth the investment
Stay safe capitalism drones
Posted on 11/10/17 at 12:46 pm to jdeval1
quote:
We had a Nissan altima that had the cvt go out with 63k on it. Costs twice as much as a regular transmission with very little benefit.
THose CVT trannies are expensive. Dad just had one put in a customer's Versa, $3700.
But they actually have an unearned reputation, they are no better or worse in terms of durability than a conventional automatic, just more expensive when things go wrong.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 12:48 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
Actually the warranty means exactly that. The better a product is the easier it is to offer a longer warranty on it.
This is a false equation.
While what you state is generally true, its not a steadfast rule, although its not a bad rule-of-thumb. The problem with relying totally on "Long Warranty = High Reliability" is that many other factors can come into play when a manufacturer determines warranty length.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 12:48 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Yep. It was around 4k I seem to remember.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 12:48 pm to yellowfin
quote:
I may just be lucky but I've owned Jeep, Ford, Chevy, and Honda and I've never had a major problem with any of them.
Probably because you took care of your vehicles..
quote:
Changing alternator on a couple is probaly the most expensive repair I've done to any of them
Anything mechanical will eventually need repairs...
This post was edited on 11/10/17 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 11/10/17 at 12:52 pm to yellowfin
quote:
I may just be lucky but I've owned Jeep, Ford, Chevy, and Honda and I've never had a major problem with any of them
I've owned Jeep, Honda, Nissan, 2 Dodge Rams, Dodge Dakota and a Ford. The only one that had any major repairs was the Nissan Altima.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 12:58 pm to LSUwag
quote:
It hurts me to say this but, don’t buy American. The big three make inferior products to the quality import brands. Chrysler being by far the worst of the big three.
The GMC/Chevrolet full size trucks are better than the Tundra or Titan, and more reliable. They have been for a very long time.
I've lost count of the full-size GM trucks I know with over 500k miles.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:00 pm to GEAUXT
because people still buy those crappy cars.
Reliability and long term dependability were important criteria for me when I bought my car. over 10 years later I am still happy with my Toyota Camry
Reliability and long term dependability were important criteria for me when I bought my car. over 10 years later I am still happy with my Toyota Camry
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:08 pm to jdeval1
quote:
We had a Nissan altima that had the cvt go out with 63k on it. Costs twice as much as a regular transmission with very little benefit.
CVTs had problems across the board. All makers that had CVTs had problems with them. For most makers, their trannys are contracted out. ZF for example, makes many of the auto trannys in all the Euro brands.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:18 pm to GEAUXT
I couldn't agree more. Then they fake up rewards in the most minute segment to self praise i.e. Chevy's highest in initial satisfaction awards. What the hell does that mean?? The day I buy it I'm thrilled but tomorrow I'm depressed I'm driving this turd?
Unfortunately, bells & whistles sell. If a manufacturer jams in enough tech shite they can get that quarter ton pick'em up truck to 100k, regardless how dependable it is.
Unfortunately, bells & whistles sell. If a manufacturer jams in enough tech shite they can get that quarter ton pick'em up truck to 100k, regardless how dependable it is.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:28 pm to GEAUXT
quote:
Why are there still so many unreliable car brands?
They're more reliable than ever.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:36 pm to Tigeralum2008
Going for latest tech carries risk.
The most frequent complaint with expensive brands is the media complex.
The most frequent complaint with expensive brands is the media complex.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:41 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
Hilarious that you both try to say that the Dodges being rated lower in some categories proves they are junk and that the ratings are a joke because the dodge minivans are rated high LOL
What's hilarious is that YOUR link made my point for ME. The JD Power ratings are silly, overall, because they are rating some crude measure called "initial quality". In a nutshell, if you would try reading, they are supposedly looking at owner reported problems in the first 90 days of ownership. And since I've owned a few new cars over the years, I can tell you it's totally subjective. They send you an email link and pose a number of questions to new buyers where you rate various things on a scale of 1-5, etc. My father-in-law is a huge Chrysler fan. If he bought a RAM today and had three issues with it in the first 90 days, he wouldn't acknowledge them as "problems" because he loves the brand and rationalizes the issues as either new car quirks or assumes he just doesn't understand the problem. He's had a few major issues over the years with several Chrysler vehicles, yet if you ask him about their reliability, he'll swear by them. And 60-year-old grandma and her new T&C isn't going to know her tranny shifting into reverse hard is an issue until it finally drops 20k miles later. So what do you think she'll say on her survey? My point stands that "initial quality" ratings are garbage marketing material for the manufacturers and that's about it. It doesn't change the fact that not only are Chrysler products at the bottom in most of JD Power's categories, but they are ALSO at the bottom in just about everyone else's, too. The Odyssey, on the other hand, is number 1 or 2 in everyone else's reviews. At least Chrysler can say it's consistent.
quote:
JD Powers is recognized as the experts on this subject fool.
Recognized by whom? The car makers?
quote:
The RAM truck is praised here as one of the best
quote:
Chrysler products
Oh...okay. Maybe.
quote:
and one of the best trucks overall
quote:
in actuality it turns out that Rams had more reported problems per 100 vehicles than Chrysler did from 2006-2016
I'd believe it.
quote:
And ALL of the Chrysler lines beat out Honda who no one would call junk.
Uuuuuummmmmm.........wut? Where dis?
quote:
The actual numbers prove what I have posted on here several times
Not in this thread.
quote:
ALL Manufacturers today build quality cars across the board.
For the most part, yes. But there are some that are better at it than others {lookin' at you, Chrysler}.
quote:
That isn't 216 major problems either, that is 216 problems no matter how minor.
Which goes back to my first statement above and the subjectiveness of "initial quality" ratings from JDP. My father-in-law would brush off a bad O2 sensor in the first 90 days or so as a fluke whereas a new Camry owner may be frustrated at not understanding how to operate their infotainment center and thinking it isn't working properly. One of these things is not like the other; yet they get weighted the same in the JDP surveys.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:48 pm to MorbidTheClown
quote:
it's not a claim. just saying that a warranty doesn't mean the vehicle is reliable
Long warranties generally mean the public perception is that the vehicle is unreliable. Honda and Toyota have been able to keep short warranties because they don't have to convince people their cars are reliable.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:49 pm to nola000
quote:
Brands to never buy...
Land Rover (I currently own one)
Jaguar
Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge (not including the Wrangler)
Lotus
GM
VW
Brands that are okay but there are typically better options...
Audi
Ford (excluding the F-250/350 as no other brands really offer a reliable alternative to. If I was in the market for a heavy duty work truck this is what I would buy. Well, maybe a customized Mitsubishi Fuso or Isuzu NPR)
Nissan
Saab
Brands that are worth buying under special circumstances(such as, you work on them yourself or have access to cheap parts)...
MB (I currently own one)
BMW
Subaru
Volvo
Porsche
Brands that the majority of people should consider...
Honda/Acura (I currently own one)
Toyota/Lexus
Mazda (VERY UNDERRATED)
Infiniti
Hyundai
Kia
Suzuki
Isuzu
Agree with all of this, save Suzuki (not really sure since they pulled out of the consumer vehicle market) and Isuzu (also out of the consumer market). Isuzu vehicles were also largely just rebranded Honda (Rodeo/Passport) and GM vehicles (Ascender/Envoy/TrailBlazer). The Trooper was one they did pretty well, though.
I recently bought a 2017 Hyundai Elantra Limited/Ultimate as I have a 30 miles one-way commute to work and needed better gas mileage. The warranty is top notch and the features are near endless. But one of the big selling points....Atkinson cycle engine with a 6-speed tranny. No GDI with a CVT BS.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:50 pm to lsu xman
quote:
Buy a Land Rover, BMW,and Mercedes today and I can almost guarantee by 100-120K miles, one would have to pay thousands in repairs.
You'll DEFINITELY pay thousands in maintenance.
Popular
Back to top



1




