- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:19 am to YungBuck
quote:He's been proven wrong and had his 'theories' shoved up his arse on several occasions. He gets money by lying to stupid people.
How is he a grifter?
That's the definition of a grifter.
quote:Ah yes, this bullshite.
he proposes an alternative thought to what archeologists want us to believe
Archeologists aren't religious people. Their knowledge isn't indoctrinated into them without anything to support it. There are mountains of data, collected by thousands of people over hundreds of years of research. Do they know everything about everything? No, but Hancock, et al know NOTHING of the scientific data, and they have none of their own. They just throw out 'theories' based on conjecture and incorrect information.
But, dumbasses keep sending them money, so they have no reason to stop.
quote:Weird how the Romans and others did that very thing, that no one including your grifter heroes have ever disputed it (because it's well documented) and no one claims they had help from aliens or whatever the frick.
You act like moving 2.3 million stone blocks averaging 2.5 to 15 tons over many miles with no roads using pulleys and rolling it is plausible
quote:
after looking at all of the evidence
What? Watching Ancient Alien marathons on the History Channel? There is zero chance you've ever looked at actual archeological data. 
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:28 am to ApexTiger
What about the Gunung Padang Pyramid. Some say it is over 20k years old.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:41 am to blueboy
quote:
No, but Hancock, et al know NOTHING of the scientific data, and they have none of their own. They just throw out 'theories' based on conjecture and incorrect information.
So when he proposed a structure such as Gobekli Tepe in 1995 and was ostracized yet a year later in 1996 he was proven right this confirms he is always incorrect? And the Romans never constructed pyramids the size of the Great pyramid, include the slope to place stones at the top and it is still unexplained. Also I never mentioned aliens and have never watched Ancient Aliens bud, but to immediately rule out a lost civilization is wild when there are tales in each society of a great flood or catastrophe, but you will dismiss it as old folk tales. Lastly, why are cities such as Derinkuyu found? I fail to see why he is a grifter other than you stating, "muh the scientific data" but carbon dating is flawed in that you must have organic material in the site to even begin to guess how old it is.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:42 am to YungBuck
quote:Fake
along with them being aligned to where you cannot fit a razor blade between it.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:44 am to scrooster
quote:
1000 ton stones ... we have nothing that would move them into place even today and the joints are so tight you can't get a sheet of paper between them.
The ones that big are still sitting in their quarry though, they didn't move them. The Trilithon had smaller stones under 800 tons.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:46 am to Jake88
quote:
Fake
Simple google search says otherwise: "If you're standing outside next to them, you can stick a razor blade or even your hand between the stones because they're so worn and beaten by the wind and by tourists. However, if you go inside, to where the stones are granite rather than sandstone, no, you can't stick a razor blade between them."
Obviously weathering has occurred when you talk about the duration it has been around, but when observing the actual alignment of the stones from the inside it is perfect alignment
This post was edited on 10/31/23 at 10:47 am
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:47 am to YungBuck
Well, that's bullshite.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:49 am to Jake88
This is seen in the Parthenon as well, where stones have a thousandth of an inch precision, but stay mad boss
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:55 am to Redbone
quote:
I'm not going to say it was aliens but it was aliens.
Illegal Aliens. Andrew Schulz had a bit about this. Think about it. There are pyramids in Mexico and Egypt......
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:57 am to YungBuck
quote:
And why would you bring Occam's Razor into this?
Go reread your own post. Then apply it.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 11:02 am to YungBuck
quote:GT was first discovered in the 80's. Hancock's theory that it's left over from some huge catastrophe like the Younger Dryas ice age is provably false. The large system of complexes and enclosures existed thousands of years before, all during and thousands of years after said ice age. You would know this if you followed any actual science on the matter.
he proposed a structure such as Gobekli Tepe in 1995 and was ostracized
quote:The Romans moved stones that are as big and MUCH bigger. This also flies in the face of Graham's 'theories' on Baalbek in Lebanon. The Romans did in fact build those structures.
the Romans never constructed pyramids the size of the Great pyramid
quote:
tales in each society of a great flood or catastrophe
Because floods have happened throughout human history, in every part of the world. The aforementioned Egyptians had stories of numerous flood events.quote:And yet you and others seem to believe it when it supports your argument.
carbon dating is flawed
quote:They do. Follow the actual science and you can read all about how they collect samples, and from where.
you must have organic material
quote:
"muh the scientific data"
Yeah, frickin' people and their science, man. I'm still waiting for any of you tards to explain to me why mainstream science would want to mislead people as you claim they do. You're the one taking people at their word, with no hard evidence to back it up. Not me.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 11:04 am to ApexTiger
Genesis 6:1-4
1 When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, 2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. 3 Then the Lord said, “My Spirit will not contend with[a] humans forever, for they are mortal[b]; their days will be a hundred and twenty years.”
4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.
1 When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, 2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. 3 Then the Lord said, “My Spirit will not contend with[a] humans forever, for they are mortal[b]; their days will be a hundred and twenty years.”
4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 11:47 am to YungBuck
quote:
but stay mad boss
Calling something fake or bullshite doesn't mean one is "mad."
Posted on 10/31/23 at 11:50 am to ApexTiger
Ache day and yashief construction Ltd. 138 King Tut Blvd. Cairo, Egypt
Posted on 10/31/23 at 12:02 pm to ApexTiger
Slaves. Owned by black people.
Al Sharpton said black people built them. For some reason he left out the slave part….
Go figure.
Al Sharpton said black people built them. For some reason he left out the slave part….
Go figure.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 12:07 pm to Centinel
quote:
Go reread your own post. Then apply it
I don't think Occam's Razor applies to this argument, because there's nothing simple about the traditional archaeologists' theories on how they were built.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 12:14 pm to YungBuck
quote:
You act like moving 2.3 million stone blocks averaging 2.5 to 15 tons
I'm not sure that's how averages really work.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 12:15 pm to ApexTiger
The white man
Posted on 10/31/23 at 12:36 pm to blueboy
quote:
Hancock's theory that it's left over from some huge catastrophe like the Younger Dryas ice age is provably false.
Can you link these studies or where his theories have been "shoved up his arse" instead of name-calling like a childish leftist? Some of us may be interested.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News