Started By
Message

re: Whatever happened to the planned dredging of University & City Park Lakes?

Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:27 pm to
Posted by dragginass
Member since Jan 2013
2983 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 12:27 pm to
I'd create an island/park with bulkheads and dredge directly into it, let gravity de-water it. At least for the bulk of material. Or use it on the city park golf course.
This post was edited on 9/24/19 at 12:28 pm
Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
11822 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

If it’s hauled off it gets way more pricey.


IIRC some has to be hauled off and may be considered waste disposal.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
68440 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:13 pm to
They should use the dredged material as fill for the site of the new zoo.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:15 pm to
Likely
Posted by Martini
Near Athens
Member since Mar 2005
49237 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

I'd create an island/park with bulkheads and dredge directly into it, let gravity de-water it. At least for the bulk of material. Or use it on the city park golf course.



This is what was done to create the Baton Rouge Beach. Most of the material that was removed and hauled from the site were the cypress stumps.
Posted by LouisianaLonghorn
Austin, Texas
Member since Jan 2006
15127 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

BREC is about to sink big $$$ in NBR for the Zoo and redoing the park.


This. NBR gotta get theirs, otherwise it's racism!
Posted by BruslyTiger
Waiting on 420...
Member since Oct 2003
4721 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 1:37 pm to
Baton Rouge Lakes: Master Plan is still there with no funding.
Posted by Erebus
Member since Jan 2019
574 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 7:14 pm to
Warning: long post. I’ve followed this topic for a long time, attended many meetings during the pitch phase and public info sessions. I drive by pretty much daily so I think about it a ton.

The lakes restoration project is absolutely massive. Many other smaller projects tie into the master plan, that stem from the thinking of “well, we might as well do a bunch of things at once instead of fix the lakes and then shelf the rest of the ideas”. Dredging and improving the ecosystem are a large part, but quality of life improvement, storm drainage, huge public works projects like bridge rerouting & traffic improvement, etc.

It’s a long term plan. Start to finish on an aggressive timeline would likely be 10 years, more realistically it would be double that. It’s going to hundreds of millions of dollars, but the more challenging aspect is that it’s going to take voters today sucking it up for something they will not get to enjoy. It’s a long term plan that our children and grandchildren will benefit from. Add in inflation since we’ve already wasted time since the study, kickbacks and corruption, contingencies (a lot can go wrong during 5+ years)

Everyone agrees it would be nice to have, but when you zoom in, everyone has an excuse or a “valid reason” to oppose. Why would it be a parish vote to put millions of tax dollars to one location? Central, EBR, Zachary, hell even Shenandoah will all have people that would never use it. Locals that literally live on the lakes have reason to oppose. NBR gets the hundred million dollar zoo, LSU gets the new lakes, what hundred million dollar amenity gets built in other parts of the parish. The smell of everything dying during the drainage process, the eyesore of the mud pit, the nightmare traffic during the excavation -real estate values would crash for a decade until it was done.

Let’s revise the lakes in a huge way so people can use them! Let’s think about parking lots, traffic woes since it’s a major destination now, bike rentals, boat rentals, city tourist attractions, now we’re looking at as much administrative upkeep as we are manual labor.

The grey area of ownership certainly hasn’t helped the maintenance. City owns a few of the lakes in the multi lake system. LSU owns a few. Brec operates a couple parks and trail around. Then there’s the question of who manages the project? Then once done, can all the current agencies involved commit to the larger upkeep and maintenance cost? Do we establish a Baton Rouge Lake Authority funded by a new tax to do those things?

Public funding, private funding, federal funding, ownership, risk liability, sustainability, donor naming rights, public/private operation partnerships, environmental impact studies, traffic studies, endless years of consulting, etc. It’s huge. So huge that it it would take more teamwork and cooperation than humanly possible of the groups involved.

20 years from now it could be completely finished but instead we’ll be having the same conversation we are now. I hope that’s not the case but I’m sure it will be.
Posted by TigerBR1111
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2014
7640 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 8:40 pm to
That’s a lot of great information you provide and helps with understanding why everything is at a standstill. At the very least there needs to be some kind of activity at City Park Lake even if that’s the only project for the moment. It’s become an eyesore and people that pass through Baton Rouge on the interstate look at it and it gives a terrible impression of our city.
Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18286 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 8:50 pm to
Traffic going so fast around the loop will cause the toilet bowl effect, no need to dredge.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
40256 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 9:01 pm to
We have high enough taxes right now. We can’t afford 200 million to do a massive project centered around the lakes, but we should figure away for BREC to at least dredge the lakes and make it more of a reservoir for heavy rains and a place to enjoy.

And if someone could figure a way to do the dredging and make it part of flood control perhaps it could qualify for federal matching funds.

All the other stuff is over the top considering what our parish can afford.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
55485 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 9:05 pm to
Hurricane Katrina happened. It was scuttled and all funds were diverted to levees and pumps.
Posted by rilesrick
Member since Mar 2015
6704 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 9:26 pm to
There are thousands of cypress stumps under the waterline . Traditional dredging apparatus will not work. It’ll be incredibly expensive therefore never happen
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7870 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 9:33 pm to
$200 million would not be worth it

Got to be a better way
Posted by sec13rowBBseat28
St George, LA
Member since Aug 2006
15691 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 9:38 pm to
Would those old Cypress tree stumps be worth any money?

I’ve probably watched too many reality tree harvesting tv shows.
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
43318 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

$200 million would not be worth it


That is too much money to fund locally. It works out to be almost $500 per head for every person in the parish. Many simply do not have it. Has anybody looked into getting federal funding?
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7870 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

That is too much money to fund locally. It works out to be almost $500 per head for every person in the parish. Many simply do not have it. Has anybody looked into getting federal funding?

That gets into the ‘is it really worth it’ territory? I’m sorry but $200 mil is not worth a 5 mile running loop.
Posted by Loungefly85
Lafayette
Member since Jul 2016
7930 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 10:33 pm to
Mayor and a good chunk of the council don’t give a flying frick if it’s not NBR or “their people”.
Posted by SlackMaster
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
2784 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

$200 million would not be worth it


Where do you get this figure? The estimates came in at $40-45 million ( WAFB) and this includes many cosmetic upgrades such as running/walking paths, lighting, etc.
This post was edited on 9/24/19 at 10:40 pm
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57965 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

Can we dredge the lakes and use the dirt to build a loop?
it's organics and not suitable for compacted fill

And I believe it registers as toxic.
This post was edited on 9/24/19 at 10:49 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram