- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/2/18 at 1:57 pm to Balloon Huffer
quote:
I believe it was called 2090.
Linear algebra, and matrices, newtons laws of cooling.
Strange I kinda remember this shite.
Never use more than calc 2 in real life though.
If there is or is not a correlation I can't say. But I can tell you I got a B in the class (2nd toughest class I ever took), am legally considered a genius..... and I am a 97-98% income earner depending on the year.
So I would say yes -- success at high levels of math more than likely lends to high intelligence.
If you have a good work ethic and high intelligence --- your all set.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:00 pm to CelticDog
quote:
Actually used it twice at work.
I have used matrix operations a few times to solve multiple equations at once, but really the only math I use now is integrating simple equations from time to time.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:04 pm to Armytiger87
Calculus 3. My original major was computer science. Then I switched to accounting.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:07 pm to Armytiger87
Quantitative Methods for the degree i don't use. Hated that class
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:29 pm to Armytiger87
HS- Calculus
BS- Statistics
MS- Statistics
BS- Statistics
MS- Statistics
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:33 pm to Rouge
quote:
What was the highest level of math you completed in your schooling?
Differential Equations, even though I found three dimensional calculus to be more challenging
Calc 3 is easier than Calc 1 and 2. Calc 1 you learn the long way, Calc 2 you learn the short way, Calc 3 is the short way 3 times.
IDK how you woul dthink Calc 3 was harder than DiffiQ
This post was edited on 1/2/18 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:38 pm to CarRamrod
Real Anaylsis and Abstract Algebra.
Linear Algebra was easy with the 3rd party app I downloaded to my TI-89 calculator
Linear Algebra was easy with the 3rd party app I downloaded to my TI-89 calculator
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:39 pm to jac1280
quote:
Linear Algebra was easy with the 3rd party app I downloaded to my TI-89 calculator
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:46 pm to Armytiger87
DE2 or Linear Algebra. LE was the hardest for me, I still today can not tell you what a subset is. I am pretty good at math, really good actually, but for some reason I never even came close to getting a grasp on subsets.
"In linear algebra and related fields of mathematics, a linear subspace, also known as a vector subspace, or, in the older literature, a linear manifold, is a vector space that is a subset of some other (higher-dimension) vector space."
"In linear algebra and related fields of mathematics, a linear subspace, also known as a vector subspace, or, in the older literature, a linear manifold, is a vector space that is a subset of some other (higher-dimension) vector space."
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:47 pm to CarRamrod
Calc3 was borderline fun. You already know how to do everything.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:51 pm to Armytiger87
Asymptotic expansion and perturbation techniques was my final class - boundary layer solution techniques. Had aspects of complex calculus and Fourier series I believe
Posted on 1/2/18 at 2:55 pm to TimeOutdoors
quote:
I never even came close to getting a grasp on subsets.
Same as the original set, just smaller.
Set = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}
Subset = {4, 5, 6}
Posted on 1/2/18 at 3:02 pm to TheHarahanian
quote:
Also, the textbook for the course was not used at all, and if you tried to use it as a reference you discovered there was no correlation between the material in the book and what Aravena did in the class.
There was no correlation between what Aravena was teaching in class and what was on his tests.
Perpetual class average on his tests in that class: 54
Posted on 1/2/18 at 3:03 pm to Armytiger87
Also took statistics and engineering economics. For whatever reason, I found these two courses more difficult than the calculus classes I took. It's not that they are hard, but for whatever reason, I just couldn't grasp the concepts as easy as I did some calculus concepts. Probably a good idea that I went into engineering and not accounting like my father and brother.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 3:24 pm to LSUAlum2001
quote:
Perpetual class average on his tests in that class: 54
I squeaked out a B, but the first test I think I got a 33 and that was a C.
That textbook was $70 and it was useless. And in my career, and the careers of everybody I know of, the course was useless. It was strictly a cut class. Like hazing on the academic side.
Posted on 1/2/18 at 3:44 pm to Armytiger87
DiffEq Linear Algebra combo class ( MATH2090 at LSU ?)
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News