Started By
Message

re: What is going to happen to IVF treatment?

Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:51 pm to
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
13878 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:51 pm to
The IVF throwaways have been a question to consider. How do preaux lifers reconcile??
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65697 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

The IVF throwaways have been a question to consider. How do preaux lifers reconcile??


Impossible to. You can't have God's Will both ways.

Coming from a dad of 1 and a dad of 2 miscarries and DNRs. 19 and 11 weeks, both sons.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
52970 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:55 pm to
This is part of the democrats plan to force us to date single moms
Posted by lionward2014
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
11704 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Those two kids sitting in my living room watching Sing 2 right now are my blood as far as I’m concerned. They may not have my DNA coursing through their veins but the in my eyes they are my blood.



They aren't, and thankfully they aren't so they don't turn out to be an absolute pieces of shite like you.
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
16484 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

The IVF throwaways have been a question to consider. How do preaux lifers reconcile??


By not throwing them away
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65697 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:01 pm to

Keeping an embryo is a financial choice every day. Should IVF be against the law?
Posted by Abstract Queso Dip
Member since Mar 2021
5878 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:02 pm to
My bf and pastor. They had 2 or 3 miscarriages can't remember. Went the IVF route twice and now have 2 healthy kids. Well one is itty bitty precious baby and the other is a 3 year old with stubborn qualities and a passion for Bluey and heavy equipment
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
16484 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Keeping an embryo is a financial choice every day.


No, it's not once you donate it to another couple.

quote:

Should IVF be against the law?


No, it should be legal.
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
13878 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

By not throwing them away
Understood. I am fortunate enough to not have been put in the position, it would be a troubling decision IMO.

Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
34559 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Ban IVF and tell couples there are a bunch of babies waiting on adoption.

I’m pro-life. My wife and I couldn’t have kids, we adopted.

It’s not that hard

Dude we are adoptive parents also but saying we should ban IVF is just an awful take.
Posted by pelicanpride
Houston
Member since Oct 2007
1299 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Shocker: the abortion issue is complex as frick


Yes, and Republicans are about to learn that lesson. If you want to be logically consistent, then IVF should be outlawed as well as the morning after pill. But why stop there? Over half of all fertilized eggs will never actually implant into the uterine wall at all, and 20% of those that do will miscarry. So a fertilized egg is really potential life if you think about it. Following that logic, shouldn’t all eggs be considered potential life? That means no more birth control. But what about sperm? No more jerking off. That wastes potential life. Republicans can’t hide behind Roe anymore. It’s time to find out how many of them have balls. I’m am curious as hell, and I’ve got my popcorn ready.

Edit: I’m not saying we SHOULD do any of these things. I think everything mentioned above should remain legal. My point is that Republicans are going to have to be logically inconsistent at some point. The ideologues are going to put them in a tough spot.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 4:13 pm
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
34559 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Those two kids sitting in my living room watching Sing 2 right now are my blood as far as I’m concerned. They may not have my DNA coursing through their veins but the in my eyes they are my blood.

Now on this we agree on.

My daughter just turned 7 last Saturday. She is my blood as far as I'm concerned even though we didn't bore her and she is a different skin color.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9342 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

We probably spent well over $10K in meds once it was all said and done, no reason some of those can't be covered by insurance. Especially when some of the medicines I were on are also used to treat other things that are covered.

The fact that some of those meds could be used to treat other things is completely irrelevant.

The purpose of insurance is risk pooling. Everyone pays a little for peace of mind, knowing that buying into the pool ensures they can afford (for example) to pay their medical bills after a car accident. Or if they get cancer.

IVF is completely voluntary. Saying it should be covered by insurance is effectively the same as saying “everyone else should have to chip in to fund IVF for those who can’t conceive otherwise.”

I’m not against IVF, but I don’t think it should be everyone’s financial burden either.
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
68452 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:11 pm to
wasnt this a problem last month, when the bill that was proposed to be passed in Louisiana?
Posted by caro81
Member since Jul 2017
4881 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

I suspect there will be.


why? biologically the same thing is happening. sorry, them the breaks.
Posted by madamsquirrel
The Snarlington Estate
Member since Jul 2009
48555 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:13 pm to
Adoption needs to be promoted as a socially accepted option. There seems to be stigma on not "keeping" your baby. I wish pro lifers would spend more time advocating for this and less time arguing pro choicers.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101919 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:14 pm to
A lot of voluntary procedures are covered by insurance if doctors sign off. That's not wholly relevant either.

Now if someone wanted to for some reason do IVF without having fertility issues, that's when insurance should shoot them down.
Posted by madamsquirrel
The Snarlington Estate
Member since Jul 2009
48555 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:14 pm to
We pay for others birth control and viagra so what is your point?
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
41493 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

I wish pro lifers would spend more time advocating for this and less time arguing pro choicers.

There’s a lot of this, it’s just not promoted or recognized
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30091 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 4:23 pm to
I'm as pro-life/anti-child murder as anyone on here but not sure where this "IVF is against God's plan" concept came from. God bestowed on us the intellect to reach the moon, split the atom, and change the landscape to feed ourselves. IVF, to me, is no different than chemo, artificial heart valves or organ transplants.

I also think the OP's gotcha isn't the gotcha he thinks it is. The embryo isn't viable until it attaches to the uterine wall.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram