Started By
Message

re: What if Hitler never invaded the Soviet Union

Posted on 5/22/16 at 10:48 pm to
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
12412 posts
Posted on 5/22/16 at 10:48 pm to
He eventually would've been forced to invade Russia for their resources and to keep Stalin out of his area.. He made operational mistakes which cost him the eastern front and would've changed the war if Hitler would have listened to his his top generals instead of ego and pride.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98349 posts
Posted on 5/22/16 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

Wasn't there an issue of oil fields in Russia that Germany needed to supply their war?


That was part of it too.
Posted by Farkwad
Byzantium
Member since Sep 2010
2669 posts
Posted on 5/22/16 at 11:08 pm to
whitey would have a refuge and a strong one at that.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98349 posts
Posted on 5/22/16 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

I always thought it was weird that Hitler didn't press the Japanese to invade or at least open up a second front in Russia's east. Then Hitler wouldn't have faced the full brunt of the Soviets.


The Japanese had clashed with Russia on the Mongolian border in 1939 and gotten their asses kicked. They wanted no part of a repeat. Japan had a modern Navy and Air Force, but its Army was stuck in WWI, with almost no armored force. Even after Stalin's purge of the officer corps, the Red Army was more than a match for anything Japan could throw at it.
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38249 posts
Posted on 5/22/16 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

What if Hitler never invaded the Soviet Union


Stalin would have invaded Nazi Germany and the Soviets would win.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164352 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 12:07 am to
We'd be posting on

du werdest einen krankenschwester brauchen droppings
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 12:17 am to
quote:

Stalin would have invaded Nazi Germany and the Soviets would win.


I guess that's another thing. Stalin had been building up the Soviet military in preparation of war. Hitler was overwhelmed by the amount of tanks that they had. Stalin wanted eastern europe. There's a reason he didn't give it back after wwii.
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
10993 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 12:23 am to
Yep, Nazi Germany was even more diametrically opposed to communism than the US at any point in the Cold War.

These were 2 super powers of their day, bordering each other, basically, and a fight was gonna be had.

Posted by JJ Vlatk
Member since Apr 2016
130 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 12:26 am to
Invading the Soviet Union was not a mistake. The time he invaded was a mistake. Had he done it right after the winter season, Moscow would have fallen.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98349 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 12:27 am to
quote:

Invading the Soviet Union was not a mistake. The time he invaded was a mistake. Had he done it right after the winter season, Moscow would have fallen.


Problem is, after winter season comes mud, which doesn't dry out on the steppes until early summer. Hitler lost several weeks bailing Mussolini's arse out in Yugoslavia, but he couldn't have launched Barbarossa in March.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82267 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 12:31 am to
I would take this question a step further and ask what if Hitler had been successfully overthrown/assassinated by more sane German officials:

peace could have easily been negotiated with Britainnia and the US - with Nazi Germany controlling nearly all of Western Europe. Then Germany could have had a better shot at either negotiating themselves into a Cold War with USSR or outright defeating / stalemating USSR and retaining their Central European possessions

I don't know enough about Japan / Pacific theater to know if peace there would have simultaneously possible or not.
This post was edited on 5/23/16 at 12:34 am
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98349 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 12:47 am to
It would have to have been before the January 1943 Casablanca Conference, where the Allies declared they would only accept unconditional surrender.
Posted by bountyhunter
North of Houston a bit
Member since Mar 2012
6340 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 1:57 am to
In 41 and 42 Germany had a very tenuous peace with the SU. They were geo-political rivals and the Soviets were clearly late to the game. From the German perspective, the best outcome could have been reached with a fast campaign. Problem was the army was not provisioned for winter and the strategic significance of Stalingrad was overestimated.

Despite popular opinion, Russia is conquerable, but you have to be adequately supplied to do so. Both Napoleon and Hitler made that same mistake.

They were both going to fight, just a matter of when. There was no benefit to letting the Soviet war machine catch up. The main problem was Germany simply squandered their resources.
This post was edited on 5/23/16 at 2:01 am
Posted by mjax57
Vinings, GA
Member since Mar 2012
3170 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 2:16 am to
We would all have blonde hair, blue eyes, a woman with big breasts, and a black Benz.
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22507 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 6:05 am to
quote:

The time...mistake
I'm convinced that if Hitler had not over-reached prematurely - if he had taken care of England and secured the Western Front first, Germany could have pivoted immediately following winter and sent the brunt of his Wehrmacht blitz-krashing into the USSR, fought along that bloody Eastern Front with proper supplies and favorable weather, and pushed Stalin and his Red Army far enough east that he could have taken Moscow in the first year. Whether he would have kept the surprise factor in a later invasion could be debatable, as to whether he could have kept Western EU resistance under wraps during this later Eastern invasion remains an unknown. But at that point, the US would in theory not yet have entered the war, so might not become a major factor in any Nazi/Red fighting. At least not until Pearl Harbor.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20533 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 6:19 am to
There's no way that they don't go to war at some point. It's not like Russia retreated back to just their territory after the war, both Stalin and Hitler wanted Eastern Europe.
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22507 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:01 am to
quote:

Message
quote:

Both Stalin and Hitler wanted Eastern Europe
Yes, that is a given. Just as war between them is a given. The big question is: when does it start? Hitler jumped the gun and got a too-soon start, before England fell. That was costly. But maybe if he had waited, Stalin would have moved to grab Eastern EU first. And then Germany would have been pinched in a very unfavorable place with a very expansive Soviet neighbor. So maybe Germany had some intelligence from inside the Soviets that led to the early start.
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:06 am to
Stalin killed 30 more million people than Hitler.

Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:28 am to
quote:

We would all have blonde hair, blue eyes, a woman with big breasts, and a black Benz.



Sieg heil.
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
72616 posts
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:34 am to
quote:

What if Hitler never invaded the Soviet Union by CadesCove


Cades, go to the GMT for just a moment...I don't desire to de-rail this riveting thread.

ON TOPIC, But he did. AND he would still be dead.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram