- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:20 am to 308
Apparently the resume of SFP continues to grow:
Divorce lawyer (in LC)
Military strategist
Ancient civilization expert
Definitely on the spectrum though.
Divorce lawyer (in LC)
Military strategist
Ancient civilization expert
Definitely on the spectrum though.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:24 am to Gifman
I'm sorry your intellectual limitations don't allow you similar ability. I don't know what else to tell you other than giving you pity 
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:26 am to Gifman
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The Giza Pyramids were created around 2500 BC. That was a Bronze Age civilization, too. And we know who built them (there are records).
What records indicate the pyramids were built in 2500BC?
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:29 am to Gifman
quote:
Divorce lawyer (in LC)
Military strategist
Ancient civilization expert
Don't forget that he puts on his doctor hat from time to time.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:31 am to Cuz413
quote:
What records indicate the pyramids were built in 2500BC?
Look up The Diary of Merer
Wiki article on it
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:32 am to Gifman
quote:
Apparently the resume of SFP continues to grow:
Divorce lawyer (in LC)
Military strategist
Ancient civilization expert
Definitely on the spectrum though.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:32 am to GRTiger
quote:
No I think he's fricking with you and you're letting him.
It's amazing that people don't realize SFP is here to troll and to hone his debating skills. (He really is a lawyer) I would not be surprised if he writes off his time spent arguing here as a continuing education expense.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't know what else to tell you other than giving you pity
Stay obnoxious.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Gobekli Tepe exists in an area where humans were starting agriculture.
Do you understand where Anatolia is?
Wrong. Gobekli Tepe was standing in its place more than 500 years before people supposedly shifted to agriculture. Around the time of the supposed shift to agriculture, Gobekli Tepe was deliberately buried.
As I said, Gobekli Tepe disproves what that user was saying because it shows that "hunter gatherers" had time to do more than just hunt. They were already erecting megalithic stones and turning them into "temples" 500 years before.
And there are even older megalithic sites in the same area. Tas Tepeler and Karahan Tepe are even older.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:36 am to La Place Mike
quote:
It's amazing that people don't realize SFP is here to troll
Wrong
But that doesn't mean I can't be funny while educating people.
When I talk in a serious tone people say I'm being autistic. When I joke people say I'm trolling. It's as if they try to set up the strawmen to make me appear to fail.
You can see lots of stuff on the last page that cannot be construed as trolling. Waiting for BorEd to respond.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:39 am to AlterEd
quote:
Wrong. Gobekli Tepe was standing in its place more than 500 years before people supposedly shifted to agriculture. Around the time of the supposed shift to agriculture, Gobekli Tepe was deliberately buried.
As I said, Gobekli Tepe disproves what that user was saying because it shows that "hunter gatherers" had time to do more than just hunt.
I don't know which "alternative historian" you're copying here, but you're showing the problem with this analytical style and I don't think you realize it.
You ignore the simple and most logical conclusion (GT just slightly shifts our timeline on agriculture) to create a complicated, illogical conclusion (hunter gatherers built GT and then buried it when agriculture started) in order to promote a narrative.
If our timeline on agriculture moved 500 years (your timeline), that's a nothingburger in the grand scheme of things. Well within the margin of error. That shift would completely explain GT as well, within the regular paradigm.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If our timeline on agriculture moved 500 years (your timeline), that's a nothingburger in the grand scheme of things. Well within the margin of error. That shift would completely explain GT as well, within the regular paradigm.
Tas Tepeler is 12,000 years old. The shift to agriculture happened 9,000 years ago. The number of 11,000 years you people are throwing out is dishonest as 11,000 years ago you see people take the "first steps" to agriculture - the management of wild cereals. That isn't agriculture. You don't see full blown agriculture until at least 2,000 years later, when you finally have clear evidence of domesticated crops and animal husbandry.
There were megalithic structures standing in Turkey 2,000 years before the switch to agriculture.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:49 am to SlowFlowPro
I noticed you didn't deny writing off your time here.
Oh, and I wasn't the down voter.
Oh, and I wasn't the down voter.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:52 am to AlterEd
Again, the most logical explanation is that there is agriculture that we just haven't found evidence of yet. Why would you ever assume that this would be evidence of hunter-gatherers without evidence of that? We don't have evidence of either explanation mind you. There's no evidence that the people who created these structures were hunter-gatherers, either.
Why would you ever choose the least logical and more complicated explanation as your starting position?
As I said earlier, it shows a mindset of people who intentionally want to make things more complicated to increase the projection of the fantastical (in theory only).
Why would you ever choose the least logical and more complicated explanation as your starting position?
As I said earlier, it shows a mindset of people who intentionally want to make things more complicated to increase the projection of the fantastical (in theory only).
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Again, the most logical explanation is that there is agriculture that we just haven't found evidence of yet. Why would you ever assume that this would be evidence of hunter-gatherers without evidence of that? We don't have evidence of either explanation mind you. There's no evidence that the people who created these structures were hunter-gatherers, either.
What I'm saying is that the other user is wrong in saying that Atlantis couldn't have existed because we know exactly when and where agriculture was developed. There were megalithic structures erected in Turkey at the same time Atlantis was said to exist. So that user is wrong. It's really that simple.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 8:00 am to 308
quote:There was a song about it so I'm going with a yes.
Was there really an Atlantis?
Posted on 4/19/26 at 8:02 am to 308
Nope. Would have been found by now. It’s just fantasy.
For some reason it’s just very compelling to white men around a certain age — generally those who love a good conspiracy theory.
For some reason it’s just very compelling to white men around a certain age — generally those who love a good conspiracy theory.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 8:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But that doesn't mean I can't be funny while educating people.
About what, exactly? What’s your knowledge on ancient civilizations? How much time have you spent on the topic?
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News