Started By
Message
locked post

Was there a battle in history bloodier than Stalingrad?

Posted on 10/4/15 at 5:53 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71735 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 5:53 pm
Depending on how you score it, the Battle of Stalingrad cost the Soviets and Germans a combined 2 million casualties. 95% of the city was destroyed and only 7,000 of the 91,000 Germans who were captured inside the city ever saw home again.

The only other battles that come close are either the Battle of Berlin (1945) or the Battle of Verdun (1916).
This post was edited on 10/4/15 at 5:54 pm
Posted by 70739tigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
1367 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 5:55 pm to
Drake vs Meek
Posted by Starchild
Member since May 2010
13550 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 5:56 pm to
During the rectification of the Vuldrini, the traveler came as a large and moving Torg! Then, during the third reconciliation of the last of the McKetrick supplicants, they chose a new form for him: that of a giant Slor! Many Shuvs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Slor that day, I can tell you!
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
29037 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 6:03 pm to
In the second Sino-Japanese war around 20 million Chinese died
Posted by Unit225
Prairieville
Member since Aug 2014
1413 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 6:05 pm to
1/9/12
Posted by RummelTiger
Official TD Sauces Club Member
Member since Aug 2004
94048 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

Was there a battle in history bloodier than Stalingrad?


Not sure - has there been a scientific study done to determine the amount of blood spilled on the battleground?
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25428 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

In the second Sino-Japanese war around 20 million Chinese died


Can you narrow that down to a single battle.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49815 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

has there been a scientific study done to determine the amount of blood spilled on the battleground?

For a single day battle, it would be hard to find a bloodier one than the battle of Cannae in 220? BC. Hannibal's forces slew over 50,000 Romans that day. It was a battle of total annihilation.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 6:16 pm to
Shiloh
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 6:22 pm to
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
76208 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

Was there a battle in history bloodier than Stalingrad?
Dem Crips had to be taught a lesson.

Turf is turf, man.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 6:36 pm to
Mongols.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71735 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

For a single day battle, it would be hard to find a bloodier one than the battle of Cannae


Battle of the Somme - July 1, 1916. 60,000 Brits fell in a single day.
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 7:12 pm to
The Somme had like 1.3 million casualties in less than five months of fighting. That might be the worst in terms of human destruction in a short period of time.
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

July 1, 1916. 60,000 Brits fell in a single day.

Yeah, hard to argue against Somme as WOAT
Posted by TigerDog83
Member since Oct 2005
8858 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 7:15 pm to
The difference in the Somme versus Stalingrad was possibly civilian casualties. The whole eastern front World War Two was brutal but the Stalingrad campaign was extremely savage for any civilians trapped in the exchanges. Beevor's book was a good read.
Posted by Priapus
Member since Oct 2012
1950 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 7:45 pm to
Marius slaughtered 90.000 Germans at Aquae Sextiae.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58879 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 7:53 pm to
Look up Arusio
Posted by MaroonWhite
48 61 69 6c 20 53 74 61 74 65 21
Member since Oct 2012
3784 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 8:38 pm to
There were 23,000 casualties in the 1-day battle of Antietam.
This post was edited on 10/4/15 at 8:39 pm
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
17197 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 9:13 pm to
D-Day?

...for more 'modern times'
This post was edited on 10/4/15 at 9:16 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram