- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:05 am to TigerBaron
But for real, that video is amazing
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:07 am to TigerBaron
That's a Hollywood special effect just like the moon landing.
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:31 am to dewster
quote:
It seems odd that we have facilities like this that can't take a lighting strike without exploding.
Believe it or not, everything worked like it was supposed to. All the liquid was contained in the tank
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:41 am to ipodking
There goes crawfish prices. Fml
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:42 am to tigerinthebueche
It should have been, and perhaps it was. I've worked in plants for 30+ years and structures, tanks, equipment, everything is well grounded in plants. Maybe something went wrong or wasn't grounded properly. OSHA will be on site and figure it out.
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:49 am to tigerinthebueche
quote:How do you know it wasn't?
Why was that tank not grounded?
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:51 am to TigerBaron
How was that much oxygen present in a nitrogen blanketed Naptha tank to allow ignition? It was above the LEL and below what should have been a UEL from all that naptha vapor psi and nitrogen inert blanket? Something failed to operate properly in the vent system for a long period of time to cause that explosive mixture of naptha vapor and oxygen that only needed an ignition source. Heck static could have created that explosion. No grounding grid is ever gonna stop an explosion if the atmosphere for it is primed up like this.
This post was edited on 6/5/23 at 10:55 am
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:54 am to ipodking
quote:
everything worked like it was supposed to.
I am guessing the roof is supposed to peel back like that to keep the sides from collapsing? Let the flame and explosion go up?
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:58 am to lake chuck fan
I would think that the vapor space should’ve been blanketed to keep it out of an explosive range. Normal system would be a natural gas blanket to keep it above the higher explosive range and a vapor recovery system to manage the pressure.
Posted on 6/5/23 at 11:19 am to dewster
Food processing plants like to catch fire alot, too.
Posted on 6/5/23 at 11:37 am to One More Shot
quote:
How was that much oxygen present in a nitrogen blanketed Naptha tank to allow ignition?
Yeah, the best comment from the video was:
quote:
For those not familiar with these tanks. The failure here is that there was oxygen in the tank.
It is typical for these tanks to have 100% natural gas (not flammable without air) or 100% nitrogen in the top of the tank.
Without this these tanks would be exploding left and right due to static electricity that builds up due to flowing fluids.
Posted on 6/5/23 at 12:21 pm to TigerBaron
I need that video for work. Does anyone know how to download a copy?
Posted on 6/5/23 at 2:06 pm to tigerinthebueche
quote:
Why was that tank not grounded?
It douubtlessly was...and grounded properly. It looks like it worked as designed. Nothing is 100% effective against discharge...a pine 2x4 will make a helluva conductor if you apply enough pressure. the way the roof material expands and peels back looks like there is intentionally some form of gas between the roof and anything in the tank which is meant to burn off without involving the liquid. Don't know that for certain but it certainly appears to be somewhat controlled...other wise the entire tank would have exploded, most likely.
Popular
Back to top

0










