- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Veterinarians…a Question About Nsaid Poisoning for Dogs .UPDATE : Rimadyl poisoning.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:22 am to OTIS2
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:22 am to OTIS2
quote:
That is concerning. I do not believe bloodwork was done before the dog was started on the medication.
The dog was receiving daily radiation to treat a tumor on a front leg. He’d completed 15 of 19 treatments. No complications. The nsaid was prescribed for radiation irritation/burn.
There was bloodwork at the start of the radiation therapy…all normal.
Could the radiation have caused some complications including if the tumor broke apart some and parts distributed? That medicine can cause issues with existing kidney and liver issues or disease. Blood work may have been ok at the start but maybe not as ok after 15 days of radiation treatments.
That amount is just barely a little high for a 65 pound dog and maybe still in weight range (going by 2mg per pound). If pills had to be broken in half Any chance someone else helping give meds might have given full pill?
This post was edited on 10/20/24 at 11:35 am
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:33 am to TJack
quote:
2 mg per kg of body weight per day.
That seems low. It may be safer to go 2mg per kg per day especially if long term usage (so 110 pound / 50 kg dog would max out at 100mg a day divided up throughout the day), but I usually see 2mg per pound/lb per day which is also probably limited to 200mg per day max even for dogs above 100 pounds.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 3:29 pm to OTIS2
OTIS
that is an acceptable dose for that size dog. preferable split into two doses a day.
to answer your question i could. unlikely but could.
can you provide more background info? Age of dog? any previous disease? when was last bloodwork done?
what are you looking to do with this information? if you are fishing for "did my vet frick me" type info, im just going say no from what you provided.
that is an acceptable dose for that size dog. preferable split into two doses a day.
to answer your question i could. unlikely but could.
can you provide more background info? Age of dog? any previous disease? when was last bloodwork done?
what are you looking to do with this information? if you are fishing for "did my vet frick me" type info, im just going say no from what you provided.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 3:46 pm to caro81
Thanks for the reply. My goal is to understand why the dog died.We’re waiting on the necropsy results.
He was 11.5 years old. His bloodwork was good leading in to this treatment. All normal in early September preparing to report for daily radiation to treat a recurrent grade 2 sarcoma on the right front leg that we couldn’t eradicate with surgery.
He was on no medication. He was very active. No arthritis. Had good hearing and sight. Still an excellent hunter.No prior disease.
I’ll post his pre admission workup.
He was sailing through the radiation treatment without any complications. The nsaid treatment began Friday evening. He stopped eating Sunday, I think. By Tuesday he’s in ICU with highly elevated liver values. Downhill quickly from there.
He was 11.5 years old. His bloodwork was good leading in to this treatment. All normal in early September preparing to report for daily radiation to treat a recurrent grade 2 sarcoma on the right front leg that we couldn’t eradicate with surgery.
He was on no medication. He was very active. No arthritis. Had good hearing and sight. Still an excellent hunter.No prior disease.
I’ll post his pre admission workup.
quote:
Information CBC: No clinically significant abnormalities Chemistry: Mild, static elevation in ALT; otherwise no clinically significant abnormalities Cytology (right antechbrial mass): Soft tissue sarcoma Chest radiographs: No evidence of metastasis, otherwise unremarkable Abdominal ultrasound: ??Nodular hyperechoic hepatopathy may represent vacuolar hepatopathy, regeneration, nodular hyperplasia, hepatitis, or neoplasia. ??Heterogeneous splenomegaly has differentials of sedation, lymphoid hyperplasia, splenitis, or infiltrative neoplasia. ??Mild bilateral adrenomegaly may be a normal variant and measuring artefact due to panting, may represent benign hyperplasia, or may represent hyperadrenocorticism. : Benign prostatic hyperplasia with small prostatic cysts. Intact male status. Mild bilateral chronic nephropathy and nephrocalcinosis
He was sailing through the radiation treatment without any complications. The nsaid treatment began Friday evening. He stopped eating Sunday, I think. By Tuesday he’s in ICU with highly elevated liver values. Downhill quickly from there.
This post was edited on 10/20/24 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 10/20/24 at 5:28 pm to OTIS2
I’m so sorry for your loss. Hopefully, the necropsy can give you answers. While Rimadyl has risks, it may not be the reason. My dog is having what looks to be a malignancy on his gum removed soon. I will decline the rimadyl/carprofen, although we’ve never had issues with it post-op. Please update when you can.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 8:36 pm to OTIS2
quote:
Mine started the drug on a Friday evening. Quit eating and the drug was discontinued by Monday. (5 75mg doses given) . He went to ICU Tuesday. I euthanized him Friday morning.
So sorry.. very similar course...fine for a few days then not interested in food..then vomiting. Liver failure then euthanasia....
Only caveat is they started her on trifexis at the exact same time. Her bloodwork before Rimadyl was perfect. She was dead in 10 days. The vet that put her down...not the idiot who killed her...said her blood profile looked like she had been poisoned.
I still miss her. She did not deserve to go out like that.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 8:49 pm to tilco
quote:
Why did they start nsaids?
To address the skin irritation/burn from the radiation treatment.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 9:05 pm to OTIS2
That’s pretty standard. The nsaids didn’t kill your dog.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 9:10 pm to OTIS2
quote:
My goal is to understand why the dog died.
quote:
He was 11.5 years old.
Is old age possible???
Posted on 10/20/24 at 9:16 pm to OTIS2
Obviously won’t bring back your dog but I always tell people cancer doesn’t play fair no matter what the circumstances it can do whatever the heck it wants to. That’s for pets and people. I have someone who I know that was going thru chemo for rectal cancer and was in his mid 30s in really good shape. So much so that no one except his family even knew he had cancer and was undergoing treatment. He died in his sleep. I have seen dogs as young as 2 die from cancer that came in completely normal a month before. Cancer is impossible to predict no matter what anyone says.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 9:17 pm to lepdagod
Older dog, cancer treatment, nsaids for radiation burn…
If I were Otis I’d want to ask all the questions… but also good to remember it’s inexact and sometimes the answer is that the plan just didn’t work as unsatisfying as that can be. Even if you find something wrong, there’s very little recourse other than sharing a review and not going back there…
If I were Otis I’d want to ask all the questions… but also good to remember it’s inexact and sometimes the answer is that the plan just didn’t work as unsatisfying as that can be. Even if you find something wrong, there’s very little recourse other than sharing a review and not going back there…
This post was edited on 10/20/24 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 10/20/24 at 9:32 pm to lepdagod
quote:
Is old age possible???
He acted/hunted as thought was 7 or 8. He died from an acute injury. He had all the symptoms of nsaid toxicity.
Posted on 10/21/24 at 11:18 am to OTIS2
Otis i'll try to gleam what i can for you here.
Rimadyl is not a particularly strong nsaid. think of it as the doggy equivalent of advil. That very reductive, but it not far off. While some healthy dog do have strong reactions to it, and it can cause hepatic(liver) damage, that is usually reversed easily with stoppage of ramdyl and supportive care.
my concern with rimadyl more than liver is kidney as that is where you will see most damage usually.
on the ultra sound i see that he had significant changes to his liver. the ultrasound interpretation is a bit lacking imho. There was also some mention of kidney chronic pathology.
With those two findings would i have started the dog on rimadyl? No. i would not have. i would have opted for topical treatments to manage the skin irritation.
Do i think the rimadyl killed your dog? I do not know. I suspect the liver was probably more compromised with metastasis than what they may have been expecting. Thus reducing its function and ability to handle oral medications. Could that have been the tipping point for the rimadyl, or was it just coincidence and the liver was on its way out anyway.
Necropsy will tell a lot. If you wouldnt mind sharing the results id like seeing them.
Rimadyl is not a particularly strong nsaid. think of it as the doggy equivalent of advil. That very reductive, but it not far off. While some healthy dog do have strong reactions to it, and it can cause hepatic(liver) damage, that is usually reversed easily with stoppage of ramdyl and supportive care.
my concern with rimadyl more than liver is kidney as that is where you will see most damage usually.
on the ultra sound i see that he had significant changes to his liver. the ultrasound interpretation is a bit lacking imho. There was also some mention of kidney chronic pathology.
With those two findings would i have started the dog on rimadyl? No. i would not have. i would have opted for topical treatments to manage the skin irritation.
Do i think the rimadyl killed your dog? I do not know. I suspect the liver was probably more compromised with metastasis than what they may have been expecting. Thus reducing its function and ability to handle oral medications. Could that have been the tipping point for the rimadyl, or was it just coincidence and the liver was on its way out anyway.
Necropsy will tell a lot. If you wouldnt mind sharing the results id like seeing them.
Posted on 10/21/24 at 11:41 am to caro81
I really appreciate you taking the time to share this information. I will post the necropsy results when I get it.
I expect your analysis is likely on point. I did not appreciate that the dog’s liver and potentially his kidneys were compromised to some degree.
Rye was extremely athletic, active and took no medication.
Thank you again for your time and knowledge. I do not expect to have necropsy results until around 3 to 4 more weeks. But I will bump this thread as well as the one I started on the outdoor forum.
I expect your analysis is likely on point. I did not appreciate that the dog’s liver and potentially his kidneys were compromised to some degree.
Rye was extremely athletic, active and took no medication.
Thank you again for your time and knowledge. I do not expect to have necropsy results until around 3 to 4 more weeks. But I will bump this thread as well as the one I started on the outdoor forum.
Posted on 10/21/24 at 12:03 pm to OTIS2
Thanks Otis. i know there a couple of us vets on here and this kind of spread of information is helpful.
i am sorry about your pup. Try not to beat yourself up or your vets up too much. You did good by treating your dog, and your vets made a decision to improved the quality of life of your dog. Like i said, the rimadyl might not have even been a real contributing factor. If they are like almost every other vet out there, they are beating themselves up enough about it while they wait for the necropsy results.
i am sorry about your pup. Try not to beat yourself up or your vets up too much. You did good by treating your dog, and your vets made a decision to improved the quality of life of your dog. Like i said, the rimadyl might not have even been a real contributing factor. If they are like almost every other vet out there, they are beating themselves up enough about it while they wait for the necropsy results.
Posted on 10/21/24 at 12:25 pm to caro81
I agree. Bad situation for everyone.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 7:30 am to OTIS2
UPDATE…necropsy confirmed “idiosyncratic injury “ to the liver killed my dog. He died from nsaid poisoning caused by Rimadyl. Beware of this drug.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 7:53 am to OTIS2
quote:
UPDATE…necropsy confirmed “idiosyncratic injury “ to the liver killed my dog. He died from nsaid poisoning caused by Rimadyl. Beware of this drug.
I am very sorry you have lost your dog. I sometimes imagine what we are going to deal with in a few years and I start to tear up at the thought. When it happens it will hit me like a ton of bricks. I am sure that it's even worse knowing that you trusted someone and it wasn't the best course of action for your dog. That has to be immense pain.
I don't think it's right to crucify the drug in this instance. Rimadyl is a widely-used drug and has immense benefits. Again, I'm really sorry for your loss.
Popular
Back to top


0





