- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:46 am to WDE24
This was explained to you earlier. Assumptions proven after the fact weren’t known facts at the time.
This post was edited on 9/21/21 at 9:47 am
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:46 am to Lee Beauregard
Disregard if already posted
Released 911 call from food CO-OP indicates Brian Laundrie as the aggressor/abuser
ETA link is Clickbait
LINK
Released 911 call from food CO-OP indicates Brian Laundrie as the aggressor/abuser
ETA link is Clickbait
LINK
This post was edited on 9/21/21 at 10:22 am
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:47 am to Lee Beauregard
quote:
Top line of affidavit (page5 bottom of page 4)
... states Brian Laundrie exited Interstate 75 on September 1 at 10:26am.
So they either have video confirmation or they were able to verify through his phone. So can we call this a "fact" now? He did return on 9/1.
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:48 am to WDE24
quote:
99.99% it's her.
Probably a little low, but ok.
Didn't want to spend 30 seconds typing additional 9s.Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:48 am to baldona
quote:
Shaved he has a pretty generic looking face to be honest. Throw a hat and mask on these days, pretty damn easy to hide.
"APB out for a 6 foot 23 year old white male, 160 lbs, bald, with a mask"
Especially if he put on a wig.
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:48 am to Gris Gris
Pretty weird to have a press conference on the same day the autopsy results come out anyways.
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:48 am to SouthEndzoneTiger
The affidavit doesn’t say that I don’t think lol. Gee making shite up.
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:49 am to GEAUXLPOST
quote:
Not relevant to investigation, just ironic in the photos in the link, she's reading about the Zodiac killer.
Did she really randomly post that photo of that page of that book on her dyrt profile? The page has references to whether the killer is still alive. I'm also alerted to the use of the term "Monarch" on the same page.
Chance that this entire story is an elaborate hoax has risen to 10%.
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:49 am to TackySweater
quote:Jesus, you are dense. What if the dna tester makes a mistake and ids it as her but it isn’t? How does the dna test change something from an assumption to a fact. Wouldn’t it still be an assumption using your dumbass logic?
This was explained to you earlier. Assumptions proven after the fact weren’t known facts at the time.
What if dna testing didn’t exist and there was no family to id the body? What evidence is enough to change it from an assumption to a fact? Why do you get to draw the line?
This post was edited on 9/21/21 at 9:52 am
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:49 am to WDE24
quote:
No. the fact never changed. The information you required to believe the fact is all that changed.
Nope. I believe it is her. They believe it is her. You believe it is her. It is now being proven that it is her.
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:50 am to WDE24
It’s an assumption right now is what we know. Not proven yet.
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:50 am to shel311
quote:
You'd be more concerned if she told you she was going to dinner than if she told you she was going to travel across the country?
In absolutely no way did I say that.
As a parent, you worry.
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:50 am to Crimsonite94
quote:
What’s funny is that some of these posters are still in here saying “no evidence” in every post and I got a warning after saying it a couple times to show them how annoying it is and that it goes both ways.
A couple times?
You were trolling, responding over and over to people "where's your evidence" over pagesPosted on 9/21/21 at 9:51 am to TackySweater
quote:Why do you get to draw the line on what constitutes sufficient proof? Who says your line is the right one to go from assumption to fact?
Not proven yet.
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:51 am to baldona
quote:
Odd hill to die on
With so many options these days it’s easy to get confused.
For the record it’s a typo...not a “Hill to die on”...
we all know it was BL in the van at 10:34am on Sept 1 in that license reader. ...Until proven otherwise.
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is so irrational/stupid
Why is it irrational or stupid for an investigation to continue based upon compelling evidence? This is a murder investigation and time is of the essence. What’s rational to you? Sit back with their thumbs up their arse waiting on a forensics report? Obviously this is compelling evidence.
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:52 am to TackySweater
quote:
The affidavit doesn’t say that I don’t think lol. Gee making shite up.
Yeah, I saw the post stating that a few posts down.
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:53 am to WDE24
Whq courts have been using for years and has proven the most reliable?
Posted on 9/21/21 at 9:55 am to efrad
And it’s still happening in here right now. I was making fun of people who can’t accept logic.
Logically it’s her body knowing all the evidence we know. Logically he did it knowing all the evidence we know. Is it proven yet? No.
What the frick is everyone arguing about? We are not fricking stupid we know it’s not proven yet, but all the info out there suggest he killed her.
Ant other assumption is a huge reach.
Logically it’s her body knowing all the evidence we know. Logically he did it knowing all the evidence we know. Is it proven yet? No.
What the frick is everyone arguing about? We are not fricking stupid we know it’s not proven yet, but all the info out there suggest he killed her.
Ant other assumption is a huge reach.
Page 293 of 549
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News