- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:09 pm to TigerMan327
quote:
Supposedly someone saw him getting gas in Wyoming at 11pm august 30th
I appreciate the clarification. For some reason I thought I had seen that was the 29th for that. But if it was the 30th, then the driving timeline is definitely questionable! Appreciate it!
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:10 pm to BeepNode
quote:
people were saying somebody was out in a field?
It is highly unlikely what people think they are seeing in that video is someone with a shovel digging a hole.
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:10 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:No, it's not. It's just an end-run around PC that you can't get via actual reliable investigative methods.
Using dogs to locate a body is fine as you actually find evidence.
Finding evidence on the back end does not justify an unlawful search (except for inevitable discovery).
This post was edited on 9/19/21 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:11 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:what do you mean “those dogs” … hm? german shepherds?
Those dogs
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:11 pm to MikeD
quote:
A dried out snow melt creek may be a little more conducive than typical ground around there. Probably terrible still but a little easier.
With all the rock in the soil a pick would do more good than a shovel.
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:11 pm to Gravitiger
quote:
No, it's not. It's just an end-run around PC
Can you show us where the dog inappropriately touched you ??
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:12 pm to Gravitiger
Enough about the dogs.
JFC
JFC
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:12 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
quote:
I’m confused. You’ve never smelled marijuana?
Nope. Never.
Now, I need you to prove that I have.
No I need to prove that you didn’t. And you are a trained law enforcement officer whose testimony is subject to cross examination.
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:12 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
There is no way for an officer to prove in the court of law that he smelled something. Using that as probable cause is just bullshite.
Just like a cop who says you’re speeding and doesn’t have the radar gun out.
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:12 pm to Gravitiger
All of you take your police gripes to a different thread.
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:13 pm to GreenRockTiger
Different incidents.
A witness called in that he saw the couple fighting, not on video.
The cops find the van and see it hit a curb where she admitted to hitting him, on video.
A witness called in that he saw the couple fighting, not on video.
The cops find the van and see it hit a curb where she admitted to hitting him, on video.
This post was edited on 9/19/21 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:13 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
Probably aiding and embedding a known fugitive.
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:14 pm to Gravitiger
quote:
Finding evidence on the back end does not justify an unlawful search (except for inevitable discovery).
A search of a creek bed is an unlawful search?
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:14 pm to Gravitiger
quote:
Using dogs to locate a body is fine as you actually find evidence.
No, it's not. It's just an end-run around PC that you can't get via actual reliable investigative methods.
Finding evidence on the back end does not justify an unlawful search (except for inevitable discovery).
My example was talking about finding an actual dead missing body out in the woods. Like in this case.
Thought that was pretty clear.
Claiming a "hit" in the van with no body would be bullshite.
I also agree with you that the typical walk the dog around the car to gain entry to the car to be bullshite and an illegal search.
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:14 pm to LSUgirl4
quote:
what do you mean “those dogs” … hm? german shepherds?
Black Labs Matter.
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:15 pm to LSUgirl4
quote:
what do you mean “those dogs” … hm? german shepherds?
Not all of them are German Sheps
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:15 pm to MikeD
Those creeks are full of rocks.
There may be a shallow sand bar here and there, but mostly alluvial rock.
There may be a shallow sand bar here and there, but mostly alluvial rock.
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:16 pm to Havoc
quote:
No I need to prove that you didn’t. And you are a trained law enforcement officer whose testimony is subject to cross examination.
I need you to prove to the thread that you smelled apple pie on the third of August of last year.
Posted on 9/19/21 at 8:17 pm to Havoc
Her body was found within 100 ft, maybe 100 yds of their camp site.
Spread Creek was a popular spot, so busy that the YouTube family who caught the white van on video couldn't find a spot.
Obviously if her body was not buried it would have been ripe after a week and you would think someone would have smelled it and reported it.
How deep would you have to bury a body to mask the decomposition stank?
Spread Creek was a popular spot, so busy that the YouTube family who caught the white van on video couldn't find a spot.
Obviously if her body was not buried it would have been ripe after a week and you would think someone would have smelled it and reported it.
How deep would you have to bury a body to mask the decomposition stank?
Popular
Back to top


0









