- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 'Unprecedented': Property tax bills have reached double value for Texas homeowners
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:20 pm to NBR_Exile
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:20 pm to NBR_Exile
Chambers county is not Houston. Mostly rural. I can see a developer buying farm land but no one in the loop is seeing these increases. I live in unincorporated Harris County. My tax went up about 20%
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:21 pm to ithad2bme
Please explain how Ag exemptions work. I’ve heard coworker mention it.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:24 pm to SPEEDY
Yeah but no income tax and GOAT HS football stadiums 

Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:30 pm to NBR_Exile
quote:
unincorporated Harris County. My tax went up about 20%
Crosby?
Posted on 6/18/22 at 3:56 pm to SPEEDY
Ouch, never felt so weirdly happy to have a state tax.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 4:07 pm to Turf Taint
I have a hard time understanding how this catches residents off guard.
Is it that the residents themselves are not paying attention to what’s going on in their area and they’re oblivious to the increase? OR Is it that these increases are taking effect incredibly quickly leaving residents no time for secondary options and they’re forced to grit it out?
Is it that the residents themselves are not paying attention to what’s going on in their area and they’re oblivious to the increase? OR Is it that these increases are taking effect incredibly quickly leaving residents no time for secondary options and they’re forced to grit it out?
Posted on 6/18/22 at 4:25 pm to belowmebama
quote:
Is it that the residents themselves are not paying attention to what’s going on in their area and they’re oblivious to the increase? OR Is it that these increases are taking effect incredibly quickly leaving residents no time for secondary options and they’re forced to grit it out?
Residents are definitely being caught off guard due to the increases being so big. I got super fricking lucky this year and didn't receive an updated tax assessment from my county.
My neighbors on the other hand got fricking hosed on their initial assessment. Thankfully they appealed and the county came back with a more reasonable number.
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 4:31 pm to BROpaneTANK
quote:
It’s always dumbfounded me that someone that buys a home can get priced out of their own home down the line by the way the market changes
This is what they did in Tybee Island Ga in the 80's-90s and it was done on purpose so rental companies would own most of the homes instead of individual home owners. It was downright criminal
Posted on 6/18/22 at 4:40 pm to TideSaint
A great reason for boomers to retire in Texas is property taxes are fixed at age 65 for your primary residence. The above 8 pages of grief apply to the kids
Posted on 6/18/22 at 5:06 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
If our Founding Fathers could see we now how a system where the state can come tell you what your property is worth and you thus owe whatever the state says in taxes, they’d think we’ve lost our minds.
Totally Agree! Basically a Blank Check for Government to get more in Property taxes. Especially now with Interest rates rising even more now. Been in my house little over 10 years and My property taxes have gone up about 300 every year but they tell me house is worth more doing. Thats all great and all but dont plan on selling anytime soon.
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 5:43 pm to jclem11
quote:
The simple fact is that suburbs should pay more in property taxes b/c they cost significantly more to exist and are subsidized by taxpayers living closer to the city center.
More like they’re subsidized by taxpayers earning money in one location and spending it in another
The problem with technology nowadays is that it removes cities’ advantage of having jobs that only exist in them. Especially if you’re a remote worker, you could work out of a trailer park a few states away and cut a city out of the equation
Posted on 6/18/22 at 7:16 pm to BROpaneTANK
quote:
Imo the only way it should work is that day you bought your home for $200k, you only ever pay taxes on your homes value at 200k adjusted for inflation. So if it say becomes worth 900k 15 years later, you only pay taxes on the 200k value adjusted slightly in todays dollars. So like 250k or something of that nature.
Here’s your problem, let’s say people in your county or whatever live there long enough. Y’all will be paying 1995 property taxes for 2022 services and infrastructure. That’s not sustainable. That’s why appraisals have to gradually meet the market
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 8:37 pm to jclem11
quote:
The simple fact is that suburbs should pay more in property taxes b/c they cost significantly more to exist and are subsidized by taxpayers living closer to the city center.
On a related note, if all those suburbanites suddenly got taxed out of their homes and decided to live closer to the city center, what do you think would happen to the housing costs in that city center and who would then be forced to move out to the suburbs?
Posted on 6/18/22 at 8:39 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
ere’s your problem, let’s say people in your county or whatever live there long enough. Y’all will be paying 1995 property taxes for 2022 services and infrastructure. That’s not sustainable. That’s why appraisals have to gradually meet the market
Why is it not sustainable if the increase is pegged to inflation? Shouldn’t cost of services also increase by a similar amount?
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:08 pm to soccerfüt
quote:
587% appreciation in one year?
That’s just a “tad“ out of whack - no?
Sell, or shut up and pay it.
No appeal? Thanks comrade!
quote:
Probably was undervalued historically and the owner never bitched about that....
Link to it being 587% undervalued (besides the government frick job)?
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:20 pm to jimmy the leg
Unless there is a sale, the assessed value of a home cannot increase by more than 10% annually in Texas. That’s per statute. I would be appealing any raise greater than 10 percent.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:34 pm to CocomoLSU
Don’t pay it. Kill anyone on your property. Rinse and repeat. Eventually these cocksuckers run out of people.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:39 pm to jclem11
It’s embarrassing that you even found that graphic much less posted it 

Posted on 6/18/22 at 10:06 pm to SPEEDY
Hell yeah. Just built a house on our land in chambers county. Can’t wait to get to fricked.
ETA: Smith Point doesn’t have about anything going for it other than the water and hurrricane titas
ETA: Smith Point doesn’t have about anything going for it other than the water and hurrricane titas
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 6/18/22 at 10:52 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Unless there is a sale, the assessed value of a home cannot increase by more than 10% annually in Texas. That’s per statute. I would be appealing any raise greater than 10 percent.
The property that went up to $382,000 isn’t under homestead exemption/10% limit and what went up was its land market value. Improvements stayed the same. Its almost 4.8 acres of land on Trinity Bay and a side on an inlet into Smith Point. Have no clue what value that is. The ChambersCAD website is now listing it $0 as it’s taxable amount right now. A similar size property next to is under $15,000. The larger property directly across the inlet with a regular house had its land value go from $14,000 to almost $200,000, but it also currently lists it’s tax value as $0 right now. The county process and website are different than what I am used to, but both are probably under appeal and awaiting hearing or it’s decision. Instead of listing amounts as unavailable during process on website they list them as $0. But who knows there are a bunch of different exemptions down there and if over 65 that exemption wouldn’t show on public records.
Back to top
