- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: University of Alabama proposes changes to core curriculum: Lit and History not required
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:02 am to StringedInstruments
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:02 am to StringedInstruments
overall reduction in hours of an already bloated system.
requiring statistics which is more important in most science fields
more flexibility to students.
seem like positive changes.
requiring statistics which is more important in most science fields
more flexibility to students.
seem like positive changes.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:04 am to StringedInstruments
Just an extension of what is going on in private industry. They can't hit certain targets, so they, being actual racists, believe that they have to lower standards to hit those targets.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:04 am to StringedInstruments
If you don't actually want to learn, you really shouldn't be going to a 4 year university.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:04 am to Shexter
quote:
Do you write for the Advocate?
Read the rest of the post. The reduction is merely for hours. They can elect to take courses in other fields and skip lit and history.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:04 am to StringedInstruments
I think every university should make public speaking and business writing a requirement. It doesn't matter what your major, those will help every student in the long run.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:09 am to lowhound
quote:
I think every university should make public speaking and business writing a requirement.
I agree on Business Writing but not on Public Speaking.
I used to think Public Speaking should be required as well but I've talked to a bunch of people in my professional life that talk about their Speech or Public Speaking classes with absolute horror and because of that it did them no good.
I think a better class that should be required is "business communication" - or interpersonal / small group discussion. This can be for meeting prep, business discussion (for future co-workers), interview skills, etc. The biggest issue with "Public Speaking" is there are so many introverts in the world that will never really communicate in their professional fields with more than 3-4 people at a time, so we need to work on those skills much more than 8+ people at a time.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:09 am to caro81
quote:
seem like positive changes.
All they are saying is the previous requirements weren't necessary and they've been wrong all along.
That goes for all academic rules they roll back in the name of pampering the underserved.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:09 am to StringedInstruments
And it continues...
Call me an old man (graduated from LSU in 1986 with a BA, then got my master's from Georgia Tech in 1989) but they are simply making it easier on students and in the process dumbing down our society.
It's a constant trend, but nothing new. When I was at Georgia Tech, I was talking with my then-girlfriend's boss, a 1970 Florida State grad. He told me that he decided to pursue a criminal justice major at FSU because he found that was the one track he could take in which he never had to write anything, just take multiple choice or fill-in-the-blank tests. He boasted that he never wrote an essay or paper or had to buy a blue book his whole stint in college.
Call me an old man (graduated from LSU in 1986 with a BA, then got my master's from Georgia Tech in 1989) but they are simply making it easier on students and in the process dumbing down our society.
quote:
Reduction of writing-intensive requirement from 6 to 3 credit hours
It's a constant trend, but nothing new. When I was at Georgia Tech, I was talking with my then-girlfriend's boss, a 1970 Florida State grad. He told me that he decided to pursue a criminal justice major at FSU because he found that was the one track he could take in which he never had to write anything, just take multiple choice or fill-in-the-blank tests. He boasted that he never wrote an essay or paper or had to buy a blue book his whole stint in college.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:11 am to BRich
The university of Alabama is trying to shed their elitist image and placate the average student.
We all know that the Gumps have an elitist reputation.
We all know that the Gumps have an elitist reputation.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:12 am to Packer
quote:
literature or a history course
quote:
From my experience, these were BS, easy courses to fill our your schedule anyways.
Not at Auburn. A year requirement of History and your answers for tests were long-form essays. Typically 3-4 questions covering a period in world (or european) history. It would always take a couple of weeks to get your test grade back because the TA's had to grade by hand. A required year of Great Books (the name of the class) that was like an english comp class with with a large reading component. Also long-form essay tests. This was late '90's so it might be watered down shite currently for all I know.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:12 am to StringedInstruments
It’s only logical that Alabama chase Auburn to lower depths of academic excellence. I think they still have coloring books in the Auburn library.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:14 am to StringedInstruments
Probably not the worst idea in the world.
Yes, a university experience/education should expose you to a multitude of areas, but I certainly think that more classes in major are a good thing.
I graduated Auburn with an Information Systems Management degree and walked out taking five or six courses in the college of business that focused on computers (one being an intro to telecom and networking, the others were in depth on Java, PHP, databases [Oracle and SQL], and IT project management). Now I had done several programming courses in college of engineering before changing majors.
I am also of the mindset of why should a history major who plans on researching/writing/teaching for a living need to take anything other than a basic level business math or stats class? There is a 99% chance they won't need any type of calculus or advanced math (linear differential equations) in their planned career, so why make them suffer through it and possibly hurt their overall GPA.
Yes, a university experience/education should expose you to a multitude of areas, but I certainly think that more classes in major are a good thing.
I graduated Auburn with an Information Systems Management degree and walked out taking five or six courses in the college of business that focused on computers (one being an intro to telecom and networking, the others were in depth on Java, PHP, databases [Oracle and SQL], and IT project management). Now I had done several programming courses in college of engineering before changing majors.
I am also of the mindset of why should a history major who plans on researching/writing/teaching for a living need to take anything other than a basic level business math or stats class? There is a 99% chance they won't need any type of calculus or advanced math (linear differential equations) in their planned career, so why make them suffer through it and possibly hurt their overall GPA.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:15 am to member12
quote:
It’s only logical that Alabama chase Auburn to lower depths of academic excellence.
Auburn is and has been ranked higher than Alabama in academics. Nice try, though.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:18 am to GetCocky11
quote:
f you don't actually want to learn, you really shouldn't be going to a 4 year university.
Most GER's could be done solo, or online. Could probably knock a quarter or more out in High School.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:19 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
All they are saying is the previous requirements weren't necessary and they've been wrong all along.
yup. that would be the correct assessment. How many of us have taken BS classes out of "necessity" that we dont actually use in our day to day jobs now.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:20 am to caro81
quote:
yup. that would be the correct assessment. How many of us have taken BS classes out of "necessity" that we dont actually use in our day to day jobs now.
Many undergrad programs should only take two - three years at most.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:21 am to StringedInstruments
This is a predictable if disappointing trend.
College was meant to enrich and broaden young minds; helping teach people how to learn, how to write, how to consider ideas, and analyze issues. Universities bungled this with hyper micro-analysis and critical studies turning everything upside down. The masses of students were no longer equipped to handle modern job market requirements and/or were ill-served by their chosen studies.
It is easier to become a trade school than do the work required to rethink the modern university. We will now produced legions of students who can slot into entry-market jobs, which is actually important, but lack the life-long thinking and perspective a classic liberal arts education once endowed upon its students. When new hires send emails failing to convey a clear message or critical issue clearly, you'll know why.
College was meant to enrich and broaden young minds; helping teach people how to learn, how to write, how to consider ideas, and analyze issues. Universities bungled this with hyper micro-analysis and critical studies turning everything upside down. The masses of students were no longer equipped to handle modern job market requirements and/or were ill-served by their chosen studies.
It is easier to become a trade school than do the work required to rethink the modern university. We will now produced legions of students who can slot into entry-market jobs, which is actually important, but lack the life-long thinking and perspective a classic liberal arts education once endowed upon its students. When new hires send emails failing to convey a clear message or critical issue clearly, you'll know why.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:22 am to StringedInstruments
Good. Focus more on actual classes for your major.
Posted on 11/3/22 at 10:22 am to PJinAtl
quote:
I am also of the mindset of why should a history major who plans on researching/writing/teaching for a living need to take anything other than a basic level business math or stats class? There is a 99% chance they won't need any type of calculus or advanced math (linear differential equations) in their planned career, so why make them suffer through it and possibly hurt their overall GPA.
Insane. The modern world requires people who need advanced analytical skills. There are definitely areas where programming knowledge can help the historian, specifically in using algorithms to help parse data. One of the problems of modern education is that how disparate subjects can aid one another is rarely mentioned.
What is at risk is both academic freedom as well as creativity in both the sciences and the arts. Creativity is one of the key aspects of Western Civilization, and is one area where rival civilizations are not likely to catch up. Creativity isn't linear either, so you don't know before hand how one person can take an idea from one field and then apply it to another. It has to be a chaotic, personal process. There are so many examples of this from the history of science that it beggars belief people would actually want to change anything.
Popular
Back to top
