Started By
Message

re: United CEO doubles down, calls passenger "belligerent", claims United followed rules

Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:00 pm to
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

Because you two are acting like children in your interactions. BUT shel posted support for his argument a couple pages back. Just because it wasn't in response to you, doesn't excuse you from ignoring it.


I've posted my arguments several times. Just because it wasn't in response to him, doesn't excuse him from ignoring it.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112898 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

So if you sit in a restaurant, they close at 10 you refuse to leave at 10. Is that your right to just stick around?

No, why would i?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:01 pm to
You posted two links. Are there only two "experts?"
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
38053 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:01 pm to
1400 abductions every day
3000 abortions every day
40+ murders every day

Yet everyone is consumed by one chinaman dragged off an airplane. Wow.
And I'm not picking on anyone here, I'm talking about all the news and talk shows. Talk about fake news!
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:01 pm to
For the record I saw a white and gold dress. Never black and blue.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61447 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

Did you enter into a contract with the restaurant saying you could stay past ten,
nope. I read the sign and it said 10. I decided I didn't like the rule.

The fella agreed to rules he decided to not follow

We are in the same footing
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112898 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

yes they did.

Your experts are wrong. Non revs book a seat like everyone else

Based on?
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:02 pm to
Did I have a prepaid reservation?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112898 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

I've posted my arguments several times. Just because it wasn't in response to him, doesn't excuse him from ignoring it.

"no they don't" is not really an argument.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

Your experts are wrong. Non revs book a seat like everyone else


Where is this in the contract of carriage?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112898 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

You posted two links. Are there only two "experts?"

That's more to support that side of the argument than you've posted.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
27473 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

Does the police officer have a legal right to remove him?
in this case, I believe that the police were acting in good faith to remove that passenger... IE they were under the assumption that he needed to be removed
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 10:09 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111518 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

nope. I read the sign and it said 10. I decided I didn't like the rule.

The fella agreed to rules he decided to not follow

But the rules actually say you can legally stay past ten?
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:04 pm to
Martial law, yeah it's kind of relevant.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61447 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:04 pm to
Based on the need to have a ticket that is issued to get on a commercial aircraft Then the need to have an accurate manifest with all souls accounted for

Guess what, the voucher you exchange for your ticket isn't US currency yet when you book a flight with it....you are counted as a booked passenger
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35381 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

I've posted my arguments several times. Just because it wasn't in response to him, doesn't excuse him from ignoring it.
Well I must have ignored it then So humour me. Does it address the terms of the contract and the specific verbiage?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

"no they don't" is not really an argument.


Neither is "the experts in the field say otherwise."
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

I believe that the police were acting in good faith to remove that passenger


but not according to policy from what I have read.

Which equals a payday.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61447 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:05 pm to
Nope closes at ten. I just decided I like the view
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
9230 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:05 pm to
quote:


You posted two links. Are there only two "experts?"


The fact is, there are other experts that think otherwise. He keeps repeating the same lawyer nonsense, like it means anything.

United could have deemed the flight overbooked simple by the fact that they subtract the 4 seats as if they are not even on the plane to begin with. Just another thought before I hit the bed.
Jump to page
Page First 49 50 51 52 53 ... 61
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 51 of 61Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram