- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: United CEO doubles down, calls passenger "belligerent", claims United followed rules
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:46 pm to tigerfoot
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:46 pm to tigerfoot
quote:You keep saying things with no basis whatsoever.
ok. Crew members take priority
The idea of "just cause" isn't exactly a policy or law.
It seems likely that there actually is a distinction between a paying customer and a crew member in this instance.
0
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:46 pm to Hangit
quote:
According to other posters on here, aviation attorneys, having read all pertinent documents, say they had no right to have him removed.
That's fine. They're wrong.
quote:
There is also a problem with them having the ability to up their offers for a volunteer and choosing to bully him instead.
Cool. So United are assholes here.
Next.
quote:
Food reference to a battered Asian style of cooking.
What I assumed, but I don't like to assume.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:46 pm to tigerfoot
quote:But he had every legal obligation to be there by said contract....
your airline seat is never your property
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:46 pm to lsupride87
quote:I'm trying man...not sure why sometimes.
tigerfoot looks so freaking dumb
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:47 pm to Chicken
quote:Meh, probably cause you realized it didn't fit your agenda, which is a very strange agenda, fwiw.
link? Pretty sure i ignored that one.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:47 pm to shel311
quote:
I provided a link with quotes already, you're wrong.
Where? I've seen nothing that proves me wrong.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:48 pm to lsupride87
Holy straw man! This thread here is honestly a shite show
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:48 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:they do
That's great, but if a passenger doesn't agree to that in the contract it doesn't mean anything
It is clear as daylight
Right when they purchased the ticket
I posted the excerpt earlier. I am not doing it again
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:48 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:I can see this argument in court.
That's fine. They're wrong.
"It doesn't matter what the contract and policies state; they are wrong."
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:48 pm to teke184
quote:Oh, of course.
That is why the clipboards they carry are so heavy... I know EMTs who "accidentally" whack a problem patient in the head while doing their write up.
I don't work on the Clinical side myself. But my sister is a nurse and was fired for swinging back at a male patient who punched square in the face.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:48 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Nope. You're clueless.
Yep. I'm correct.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:49 pm to lsupride87
My thoughts, if not explicitly conveyed, were that if a person disobeys a lawful request by a police officer and ends up getting hurt or killed due to a appropriate response by the police, then that person is to blame for his situation. Your scenario is totally different. You can move along now.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:49 pm to SuperSaint
What is the straw man?
Asian man got the shite beat out of him for following a contract......
Asian man got the shite beat out of him for following a contract......
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:49 pm to buckeye_vol
In other words, the Vincent Laguardia Gambini defense of "Everything that guy said is bullshite."
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:50 pm to tigerfoot
quote:And the airline companies can just call you, anonymous message board poster who doesn't know aviation law and likely hasn't read United's Contract of Carriage to represent them.
The super duper attorneys are missing out in about 40000 cases of year. This illegal outrage will occur about 590 times tomorrow
these world class aviation attorneys should jump in that
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:50 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
That's not how this works. They have policies, and they must abide by them. Just because some low level employee says someone must leave, if that order is counter to policy, then it doesn't automatically become OK because "the employee said so."
That is incorrect. United gives their employees authority to operate on their behalf in this matter.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:50 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:The experts in the field say otherwise...
United says they asked him to leave and he refused.
Case closed.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:50 pm to Chicken
quote:Wohhhhhh
My thoughts, if not explicitly conveyed, were that if a person disobeys a lawful request by a police officer and ends up getting hurt or killed due to a appropriate response by the police, then that person is to blame for his situation. Your scenario is totally different. You can move along now.
Nice 180. What was the "lawful" request here?
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:51 pm to lsupride87
People are in here building different cases through completely different scenarios.
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:51 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
No, they don't.
Page 48 of 61
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News