Started By
Message

re: Ukraine say U.S. tanks are ineffective and armor is useless

Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:53 am to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72140 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Or is this a case of we gave them old out of date stuff we are replacing with newer better stuff? I’m legit asking


They’re getting the export version* of the Abrams model that dates from the 1980s, namely the M1A1. The M1A1’s replacement, the M1A2 has been around since the mid-1990s and itself has been updated multiple times since then.

* Export version has less armor protection and different fire control system.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72140 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Well obviously they need more of our tax dollars.


No amount of money will buy you the ability to perform combined arms warfare. It will buy you the equipment necessary. But the know-how comes from months and even years of training.

Think of it this way, if you go buy your wife and kids a complete set of tools and build them a shop, do you think this means they have all their need to pull the engine from your truck, rebuild it, reinstall it, and then have it run?
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
69702 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:59 am to
That’s a bunch of shite

The Ukraines aren’t just maintaining the equipment well just like Russians do
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60691 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:59 am to
quote:

Focusing more on creating the new most advance that cost way more to produce, harder to maintain, more complicated to use, and not as durable.
sounds to me like the tank is being used in a way we would never use it. Artillery from a tank? We have shite for that.

And these older tanks are getting whipped by drones, a new technology. It isn’t the advancement of the Abram’s that makes it susceptible

It is the new ways wars are fought

If we control the skies and the seas we will control the land. We aren’t going tank in tank any more. But if we do the Abrams is positioned to win

Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
38945 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

From this assessment it sounds like Ukraine is fricked at this point in the war. With man power issues, a Frankenstein of equipment, and lack of strategy there’s no wonder weapon that can achieve this.


We need to give them moar!!!
Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
41283 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:09 pm to
I dont expect a bunch of chuds with a few weeks to months of trainning to be very effective in a machine that takes years of experience to master. So, no shite it isnt working well
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16268 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

You’re right they’re even more complicated and require even more logistics while also being much heavier which is what Ukraine is complaining about. You think making the tanks more complicated fixes the issue of it being overly engineered?


And what was the result of the last US made and manned tanks vs Russian made tank battles in less than ideal conditions? More specifically the Battle of 73 Easting and Medina Ridge?

Show that to the feckless Ukrainians and report back.


Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
14535 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

I hate the U.S. because I fairly criticize the theft by defense contractors making useless junk. Let build more billion dollar jets I’m sure 2 that can’t stay in the air for more than an hour will be extremely useful.



So that's it? Nothing about "stolen land," "founded on racism," etc? Don't be shy- air your greivances!
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:21 pm to
Officially, basic training has been cut from 60 days to 45 days, but if you read the obituaries, they've been sending a substantial number of men to the front within a week of being conscripted. And that's been true for at least a year and half.

The following is from a Russian Telegram account.

quote:

Called up on 05/07/2024, liquidated on 05/26/2024...Count the days.


LINK

quote:

Ruslan Korobytsyn, drafted into the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in April 2024...Killed on May 18, 2024.


LINK

quote:

Called up 05/01/2024, killed 05/14/2024. Buried 05/18/2024. The entire army biography was completed in 14 days.


LINK

This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 1:47 pm
Posted by Grigio
Member since May 2023
616 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

they kicked the Rooskies’ arse didn’t they?



You could argue that they kicked our arse too.

We were there 20 years and left with nothing to show for it other than 10k dead, 100k crippled/peg legged, and 22/day blowing their brains out at home. Taliban is back in control of Afghanistan, Iran controls Iraq and most of the region, Syria never even got to taste our "democracy".

Do you call that a victory?
Posted by TigerHornII
Member since Feb 2021
1155 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Or is this a case of we gave them old out of date stuff we are replacing with newer better stuff?

I’m legit asking


In a lot of cases, yes, we sent them old stuff. The Hawk missile system, older export M1's with a few upgrades, etc, along with some newer or 1 generation old stuff.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138096 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

they havent even figured out theyve been duped. US government sends them billions...but most of the money just goes back to US political player's private accounts...then the crooked Ukrainian officials get their cut. All they actually get is our junk with a few trinkets that the remaining scraps of money will buy.

And Ukraine is on the hook for repaying all that money thus turning them into a US serf state for the next 200 years, if they even win.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
23351 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:30 pm to
We sent them Abram’s because at some point you need a tank to battle a tank in the morale department. The problem is you can’t use tanks to battle infantry and drones without support, and that’s what the Ukrainians are finding out. And the Russians.

Look, we like to shite on the DOD and sending money to others but deep down a huge reason why we do this overseas is to educate ourselves to better our own military with other countries soldiers. I don’t like it, but we do it for the sales of equipment and the knowledge. If it’s not us, they’ll buy it from someone else and teach someone else.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138096 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:31 pm to
The Russians learned that lesson hard in Chechnya. The lost a lot of tanks in that war..
Posted by Rev Bob Levy Sucks
Member since May 2024
101 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:32 pm to
quote:


And Ukraine is on the hook for repaying all that money thus turning them into a US serf state for the next 200 years, if they even win.



Its cute you think Ukraine is ever going to repay

Most of the resources have been funneled to the private accounts of leaders in Ukraine and then back into certain hands around the world

And our politicians are in on it as well

They will simply forgive the "loan" like they keep doing for anything else
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
44888 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

I’ve said it over and over again.

The U.S. military are making the same mistakes the Nazi made in WW2. Focusing more on creating the new most advance that cost way more to produce, harder to maintain, more complicated to use, and not as durable.


While the Soviet and U.S. at the time cracked out euipment like no tomorrow by being simple but effective.
Whatever equipment Russia has, they sure are having a tough time taking Ukraine. I thought they would invade and it would be over in short order.
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
20429 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Or is this a case of we gave them old out of date stuff we are replacing with newer better stuff? I’m legit asking


Ehhh…the Marine Corps did away with their tank units. They only have light armor now.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61275 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:54 pm to
This commie cock sucking OP started a thread earlier this week stating China is much better than the US because they built some shitty rail lines that are barely used and not sustainable.
Just so yall know who you are dealing with.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19164 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Whatever equipment Russia has, they sure are having a tough time taking Ukraine. I thought they would invade and it would be over in short order.
Russians made 3 critical errors in their initial thrusts in my estimation:

1. Anticipated a much bigger psychological effect of those columns. They didn't hide the fact they were going to kill the Ukrainian leadership; combine that with the images of those armored columns they expected that leadership to flee and consequently the army to surrender.

2. Because they assumed #1 their infantry wasn't properly supporting that armor. They infantry was there, but they were just "present", they weren't supporting them.

3. Because of #2 the Russians attempted to bludgeon strongpoints to create #1 without proper air support against those specific strongpoints. Instead they were using their air power as a high-tech terror weapon instead of making those strongpoints a no-go zone for even hunter-killer teams.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72140 posts
Posted on 5/29/24 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Officially, training has been cut from 60 days to 45 days, but if you read the obituaries, they've been sending a substantial number of men to the front within a week of being conscripted. And that's been true for at least a year and half.


You can’t even properly train an entry level tanker in that amount of time, much less an entire tank crew. Here’s how training a tanker works:

Basic Training (OSUT) 15 weeks - this gives you a buck private trained and ready to serve at either the loader or driver’s position. They’re proficient (at entry level) in performing the duties of these two positions, which means. They have skills such as
1. Ammo ID
2. Operation and maintenance of the M240 & M2 machine guns.
3. Operation and maintenance of the 120mm breach.
4. Operation and maintenance of radio communications.
5. Operating the tank per tank commander orders in formation with other tanks while also taking best advantage of the terrain.
6. Simple maintenance of the tank’s mechanical systems, including the tracks and undercarriage.

Most guys start at the loader’s position and then after a year or so moves to the driver’s position. After two, maybe three years they’re ready to move the gunner’s position. There they will:

1. Be proficient in operation of the main and auxiliary sighting system for target identification and engagement using both daylight and thermal settings.
2. Be proficient in operating and maintaining the ballistic computer.
4. Be proficient in bore sighting the main gun.

You can expect a guy to be a gunner for another year, two, or even longer. Then there is the tank commander. He’s already progressed through the loader, driver, and gunner’s positions. He’s been on tanks for usually 4+ years by the time he gets command of his own tank, plus going though NCO schools as well. He will:

1. Be proficient in all tank crewman positions.
2. Be proficient in issuing fire commands in an effective manner.
3. Be proficient in coordinating with the other 3 tanks in the platoon, particularly his wingman tank.
4. Be proficient in armor vehicle ID and what ammunition to use against each.
5. Be proficient in operation of M2 machine gun.

And that’s just one crew. These Ukrainians have only had the Abrams a matter of months where they went through a crash course. It takes a good 4 years before a guy is really ready to command a single Abrams. And then they have to train with the other tank crews in their platoon, company, battalion, and finally brigade and division. All this takes time, years really.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram