- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ukraine say U.S. tanks are ineffective and armor is useless
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:53 am to OneSaintsFan
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:53 am to OneSaintsFan
quote:
Or is this a case of we gave them old out of date stuff we are replacing with newer better stuff? I’m legit asking
They’re getting the export version* of the Abrams model that dates from the 1980s, namely the M1A1. The M1A1’s replacement, the M1A2 has been around since the mid-1990s and itself has been updated multiple times since then.
* Export version has less armor protection and different fire control system.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:57 am to alphaandomega
quote:
Well obviously they need more of our tax dollars.
No amount of money will buy you the ability to perform combined arms warfare. It will buy you the equipment necessary. But the know-how comes from months and even years of training.
Think of it this way, if you go buy your wife and kids a complete set of tools and build them a shop, do you think this means they have all their need to pull the engine from your truck, rebuild it, reinstall it, and then have it run?
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:59 am to RaoulDuke504
That’s a bunch of shite
The Ukraines aren’t just maintaining the equipment well just like Russians do
The Ukraines aren’t just maintaining the equipment well just like Russians do
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:59 am to RaoulDuke504
quote:sounds to me like the tank is being used in a way we would never use it. Artillery from a tank? We have shite for that.
Focusing more on creating the new most advance that cost way more to produce, harder to maintain, more complicated to use, and not as durable.
And these older tanks are getting whipped by drones, a new technology. It isn’t the advancement of the Abram’s that makes it susceptible
It is the new ways wars are fought
If we control the skies and the seas we will control the land. We aren’t going tank in tank any more. But if we do the Abrams is positioned to win
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:09 pm to RaoulDuke504
quote:
From this assessment it sounds like Ukraine is fricked at this point in the war. With man power issues, a Frankenstein of equipment, and lack of strategy there’s no wonder weapon that can achieve this.
We need to give them moar!!!
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:09 pm to RaoulDuke504
I dont expect a bunch of chuds with a few weeks to months of trainning to be very effective in a machine that takes years of experience to master. So, no shite it isnt working well
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:16 pm to RaoulDuke504
quote:
You’re right they’re even more complicated and require even more logistics while also being much heavier which is what Ukraine is complaining about. You think making the tanks more complicated fixes the issue of it being overly engineered?
And what was the result of the last US made and manned tanks vs Russian made tank battles in less than ideal conditions? More specifically the Battle of 73 Easting and Medina Ridge?
Show that to the feckless Ukrainians and report back.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:17 pm to RaoulDuke504
quote:
I hate the U.S. because I fairly criticize the theft by defense contractors making useless junk. Let build more billion dollar jets I’m sure 2 that can’t stay in the air for more than an hour will be extremely useful.
So that's it? Nothing about "stolen land," "founded on racism," etc? Don't be shy- air your greivances!
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:21 pm to Darth_Vader
Officially, basic training has been cut from 60 days to 45 days, but if you read the obituaries, they've been sending a substantial number of men to the front within a week of being conscripted. And that's been true for at least a year and half.
The following is from a Russian Telegram account.
LINK
LINK
LINK
The following is from a Russian Telegram account.
quote:
Called up on 05/07/2024, liquidated on 05/26/2024...Count the days.
LINK
quote:
Ruslan Korobytsyn, drafted into the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in April 2024...Killed on May 18, 2024.
LINK
quote:
Called up 05/01/2024, killed 05/14/2024. Buried 05/18/2024. The entire army biography was completed in 14 days.
LINK
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:22 pm to Czechessential
quote:
they kicked the Rooskies’ arse didn’t they?
You could argue that they kicked our arse too.
We were there 20 years and left with nothing to show for it other than 10k dead, 100k crippled/peg legged, and 22/day blowing their brains out at home. Taliban is back in control of Afghanistan, Iran controls Iraq and most of the region, Syria never even got to taste our "democracy".
Do you call that a victory?
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:26 pm to OneSaintsFan
quote:
Or is this a case of we gave them old out of date stuff we are replacing with newer better stuff?
I’m legit asking
In a lot of cases, yes, we sent them old stuff. The Hawk missile system, older export M1's with a few upgrades, etc, along with some newer or 1 generation old stuff.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:26 pm to scottydoesntknow
quote:
they havent even figured out theyve been duped. US government sends them billions...but most of the money just goes back to US political player's private accounts...then the crooked Ukrainian officials get their cut. All they actually get is our junk with a few trinkets that the remaining scraps of money will buy.
And Ukraine is on the hook for repaying all that money thus turning them into a US serf state for the next 200 years, if they even win.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:30 pm to Darth_Vader
We sent them Abram’s because at some point you need a tank to battle a tank in the morale department. The problem is you can’t use tanks to battle infantry and drones without support, and that’s what the Ukrainians are finding out. And the Russians.
Look, we like to shite on the DOD and sending money to others but deep down a huge reason why we do this overseas is to educate ourselves to better our own military with other countries soldiers. I don’t like it, but we do it for the sales of equipment and the knowledge. If it’s not us, they’ll buy it from someone else and teach someone else.
Look, we like to shite on the DOD and sending money to others but deep down a huge reason why we do this overseas is to educate ourselves to better our own military with other countries soldiers. I don’t like it, but we do it for the sales of equipment and the knowledge. If it’s not us, they’ll buy it from someone else and teach someone else.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:31 pm to baldona
The Russians learned that lesson hard in Chechnya. The lost a lot of tanks in that war..
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:32 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
And Ukraine is on the hook for repaying all that money thus turning them into a US serf state for the next 200 years, if they even win.
Its cute you think Ukraine is ever going to repay
Most of the resources have been funneled to the private accounts of leaders in Ukraine and then back into certain hands around the world
And our politicians are in on it as well
They will simply forgive the "loan" like they keep doing for anything else
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:34 pm to RaoulDuke504
quote:Whatever equipment Russia has, they sure are having a tough time taking Ukraine. I thought they would invade and it would be over in short order.
I’ve said it over and over again.
The U.S. military are making the same mistakes the Nazi made in WW2. Focusing more on creating the new most advance that cost way more to produce, harder to maintain, more complicated to use, and not as durable.
While the Soviet and U.S. at the time cracked out euipment like no tomorrow by being simple but effective.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:34 pm to OneSaintsFan
quote:
Or is this a case of we gave them old out of date stuff we are replacing with newer better stuff? I’m legit asking
Ehhh…the Marine Corps did away with their tank units. They only have light armor now.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 12:54 pm to RaoulDuke504
This commie cock sucking OP started a thread earlier this week stating China is much better than the US because they built some shitty rail lines that are barely used and not sustainable.
Just so yall know who you are dealing with.
Just so yall know who you are dealing with.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 1:18 pm to The Mick
quote:Russians made 3 critical errors in their initial thrusts in my estimation:
Whatever equipment Russia has, they sure are having a tough time taking Ukraine. I thought they would invade and it would be over in short order.
1. Anticipated a much bigger psychological effect of those columns. They didn't hide the fact they were going to kill the Ukrainian leadership; combine that with the images of those armored columns they expected that leadership to flee and consequently the army to surrender.
2. Because they assumed #1 their infantry wasn't properly supporting that armor. They infantry was there, but they were just "present", they weren't supporting them.
3. Because of #2 the Russians attempted to bludgeon strongpoints to create #1 without proper air support against those specific strongpoints. Instead they were using their air power as a high-tech terror weapon instead of making those strongpoints a no-go zone for even hunter-killer teams.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 1:20 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
Officially, training has been cut from 60 days to 45 days, but if you read the obituaries, they've been sending a substantial number of men to the front within a week of being conscripted. And that's been true for at least a year and half.
You can’t even properly train an entry level tanker in that amount of time, much less an entire tank crew. Here’s how training a tanker works:
Basic Training (OSUT) 15 weeks - this gives you a buck private trained and ready to serve at either the loader or driver’s position. They’re proficient (at entry level) in performing the duties of these two positions, which means. They have skills such as
1. Ammo ID
2. Operation and maintenance of the M240 & M2 machine guns.
3. Operation and maintenance of the 120mm breach.
4. Operation and maintenance of radio communications.
5. Operating the tank per tank commander orders in formation with other tanks while also taking best advantage of the terrain.
6. Simple maintenance of the tank’s mechanical systems, including the tracks and undercarriage.
Most guys start at the loader’s position and then after a year or so moves to the driver’s position. After two, maybe three years they’re ready to move the gunner’s position. There they will:
1. Be proficient in operation of the main and auxiliary sighting system for target identification and engagement using both daylight and thermal settings.
2. Be proficient in operating and maintaining the ballistic computer.
4. Be proficient in bore sighting the main gun.
You can expect a guy to be a gunner for another year, two, or even longer. Then there is the tank commander. He’s already progressed through the loader, driver, and gunner’s positions. He’s been on tanks for usually 4+ years by the time he gets command of his own tank, plus going though NCO schools as well. He will:
1. Be proficient in all tank crewman positions.
2. Be proficient in issuing fire commands in an effective manner.
3. Be proficient in coordinating with the other 3 tanks in the platoon, particularly his wingman tank.
4. Be proficient in armor vehicle ID and what ammunition to use against each.
5. Be proficient in operation of M2 machine gun.
And that’s just one crew. These Ukrainians have only had the Abrams a matter of months where they went through a crash course. It takes a good 4 years before a guy is really ready to command a single Abrams. And then they have to train with the other tank crews in their platoon, company, battalion, and finally brigade and division. All this takes time, years really.
Popular
Back to top



0








