- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ukraine destroys Russia’s nuclear bombers
Posted on 6/1/25 at 11:29 am to RaoulDuke504
Posted on 6/1/25 at 11:29 am to RaoulDuke504
quote:
They’re calling it a terrorist attack because
Because Russia doesn't want to recognize Ukraine as a state actor. Calling it an act of war means they view Ukraine as an independent state actor. Calling it a terrorist attack means they don't have to recognize Ukraine as an independent nation.
0
Posted on 6/1/25 at 11:29 am to MasterDigger
Posted on 6/1/25 at 11:29 am to RaoulDuke504
John Barron and SirWinston on suicide watch.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 11:29 am to HeadCall
quote:
How are they “unsuspecting?”
The general that got blown up. The guy was hired to deliver the package and didn’t know what was in it and they blew him up as well.
The bridge attack and this most recent attack was a shipment deliveries where people were hired to move cargo and were blown up after doing so.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 11:31 am to RaoulDuke504
Still not terrorism
Posted on 6/1/25 at 11:32 am to RaoulDuke504
I wondered how the Aeroprakt company is still in operation and sending Light Sport Aircraft (LSA) to the United States. Me thinks they're being subsidized by the American MIC:
Aeroprakt A-22 UCAV
These are actually really cool airplanes:
Aeroprakt A-22 UCAV
These are actually really cool airplanes:
This post was edited on 6/1/25 at 11:36 am
Posted on 6/1/25 at 11:33 am to RaoulDuke504
quote:
They’re calling it a terrorist attack because Ukraine keeps hiring unsuspecting civilians to deliver these attacks while they have no idea.
The Russians say they have detained one of the truck drivers.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 12:22 pm to RaoulDuke504
quote:
This is a day after they blew up a bridge into a passenger train
They blew up a railroad? Like in every war since rail lines existed?
Posted on 6/1/25 at 12:27 pm to John Barron
quote:
Incorrect
Whatever Ivan....
Posted on 6/1/25 at 12:30 pm to No Colors
quote:
By the way: You don't think it was the Trump administration intelligence agencies who tipped off Ukraine to all these bombers lined up in a row?
Do I think US assets tipped them off? Yes.
Do I think Trump ordered them to? No.
DoD/US IC/deep state is not captured by the Trump administration or Lyndsay Graham wouldn’t be sitting in Kyiv telling Zelensky not to worry about Trump during a peace negotiation.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 12:37 pm to John Barron
quote:
Incorrect. 3-4 bombers were damaged. I bet you also believed the Ghost of Kiev story
Posted on 6/1/25 at 12:39 pm to Lexis Dad
quote:
Donald Trump, John Barron and SirWinston on suicide watch.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 12:41 pm to RaoulDuke504
quote:
The general that got blown up. The guy was hired to deliver the package and didn’t know what was in it and they blew him up as well.
The bridge attack and this most recent attack was a shipment deliveries where people were hired to move cargo and were blown up after doing so.
How do you 'unsuspectingly' launch 472 drone missiles and 7 cruise missiles?
Posted on 6/1/25 at 12:44 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
So a couple of old prop bombers destroyed = obliterating Russian strategic aviation?
The TU-95 is indeed a “prop bomber”. It’s also the backbone on the Russian strategic bomber force. I don’t know precisely how many of them the Ukrainians took out, but if it’s even close to 40, that is indeed a massive blow to Russia’s nuclear triad. Hell, even if it’s half that number, that’s still a big loss for Russia. X
Posted on 6/1/25 at 12:54 pm to RaoulDuke504
quote:
Ukraine is obviously trying to provoke a major attack to garner more sympathy. Just last week Kyiv got bomber the worse in the war because they sent 600 drones to Moscow that did minimal damage.
What kind of response do you think destroying nuclear bombers and blowing up a passenger train will get?
I don’t think these strikes are solely to gain sympathy from the West. Peace talks are coming, and coming soon. Ukraine is looking to go into those peace talks with the strongest hand they can. It’s apparent they cannot look to battlefield success where they’ve taken land from the Russians. In fact, due to manpower shortages on the part of Ukraine, it’s looking more and more like Ukraine needs this war to end as soon as possible before their front collapses. So, what is left for them to do to have some sort of bargaining chips at the negotiating table? Well, the ability to hurt Russia in its own territory. That’s really it. So, I think what we’re seeing with the strike on the bomber bases and the train attack, is Ukraine looking for some sort of leverage at the peace talks that will start at some point in the coming weeks.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 12:56 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
According to the Guardian, it was 40+.
The Guardian is a propaganda rag. I would put no stock in this number...
Posted on 6/1/25 at 12:58 pm to Darth_Vader
Posted on 6/1/25 at 12:58 pm to John Barron
quote:If Russia had attacked Ukrainian air craft with this success you would have started 6 threads on two different TD boards praising the attack.
3-4 Bombers out of Hundreds.
Oh, I forgot, you're neutral in this war....
Posted on 6/1/25 at 12:59 pm to John Barron
Posted on 6/1/25 at 1:00 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The Guardian is a propaganda rag. I would put no stock in this number...
The NAFO trolls love U.K. propaganda, the Ghost of Kiev and Snake Island are totally real Bro
Page 3 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News