0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Two of every species, or evolution after the flood?
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:08 pm to northshorebamaman
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:08 pm to northshorebamaman
If God gets involved with the outcomes of football games and deer hunts what makes you think he couldnt get involved with the ark?
This post was edited on 9/28/26 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:09 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:NO!
I fricking get it, dude. You don't believe in a global flood.
You don't "fricking get it, dude"! You have no clue dude.
There were GARGANTUAN unimaginably catastrophic floods .... worldwide!
That is what you don't "f*cking get, dude!"
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:10 pm to northshorebamaman
What do you believe? Most religions have a flood story so it's hard to imagine you don't believe in some version of it.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:11 pm to NC_Tigah
You have the floor. Make your point. Clearly. Which you're struggling at today.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:13 pm to Joshjrn
why two mosquitos? why?
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You don't? The OP doesn't even understand he's a simple agnostic.
I don't think OP's personal opinion/belief would reject
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:14 pm to StrongOffer
quote:
Because the theory of evolution states all life evolved from a single-celled organism. Logic would say they would become 2-celled organisms before they became complex organisms. There are no 2-celled organisms or even 3-celled organisms. That would seem to leave a gap in the theory.
Whose logic? What you feel should happen does not have any relevance to reality.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:15 pm to GRTiger
quote:That I have no concrete reason to believe or disbelieve in a creator. That may change but it hasn't yet. To flat out deny the existence of a creator is the epitome of arrogance but I personally have not witnessed any evidence that the opposite is true either.
What do you believe?
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:16 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:Huh? I openly identify as agnostic.
You don't? The OP doesn't even understand he's a simple agnostic.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:17 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
You have the floor.
"Dude" ... you are unaware that there were GARGANTUAN catastrophic floods as the most recent stadial period drew to a close?
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:18 pm to NC_Tigah
I'm aware. And?
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:19 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
personally have not witnessed any evidence that the opposite is true either.
What does that look like?
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:22 pm to Cfrobel
quote:You could ask the same thing to yourself. And physical science shows when cells split, they become 2 cells, not 35 or 1,367,568,246,295 cells. We accept human evolution because we find evidence of Neanderthals, homo erectus, etc. We don’t find that in the evolution of the cell. We find complex organisms and single-celled organism.
Whose logic? What you feel should happen does not have any relevance to reality.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:24 pm to GRTiger
quote:The evidence you mean? The same evidence that I imagine most believers have. A personal testimony. Many of my family members claim a personal relationship with their god. I haven't experienced that. That would count as personal evidence to me though it wouldn't convince anyone else.
What does that look like?
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:25 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:Damn.
I'm aware. And?
Well, hello Mickey.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:28 pm to NC_Tigah
Are you trying to say that the widespread regional flooding following the last ice age= a singular global flood or are you saying something else?
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:35 pm to northshorebamaman
There isn’t any evidence of evolution in the animal kingdom… one deserted island doesn’t prove a damn thing
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:38 pm to StrongOffer
quote:But weren't you just decrying the existence of 3 celled organisms?
You could ask the same thing to yourself. And physical science shows when cells split, they become 2 cells, not 35 or 1,367,568,246,295 cells. We accept human evolution because we find evidence of Neanderthals, homo erectus, etc. We don’t find that in the evolution of the cell. We find complex organisms and single-celled organism.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:38 pm to backbone
quote:
There isn’t any evidence of evolution in the animal kingdom… one deserted island doesn’t prove a damn thing
Posted on 9/28/26 at 6:55 pm to StrongOffer
quote:
And physical science shows when cells split, they become 2 cells, not 35 or 1,367,568,246,295 cells. We accept human evolution because we find evidence of Neanderthals, homo erectus, etc. We don’t find that in the evolution of the cell. We find complex organisms and single-celled organism.
We have a period of a billion years with only single celled organisms prior to the emergence of any multicellular life. From there it's still several hundred million years before we see the first most basic animal forms. What does your logic suggest happened if cells were unable to evolve?
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News