Started By
Message

re: Two of every species, or evolution after the flood?

Posted on 9/28/26 at 7:21 pm to
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1866 posts
Posted on 9/28/26 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

There isn’t any evidence of evolution in the animal kingdom


Pls be sincere. I love stupid people
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
104575 posts
Posted on 9/28/26 at 7:34 pm to
There’s no possible way to get all of earths species on that boat

The flood was regional. It’s likely Noah got two of the most common local species in the region, that being the Mesopotamian River valleys. People need to not take early biblical stories too literal as the men who wrote them down were limited in knowledge of the earth
Posted by backbone
Colorado
Member since Jul 2026
646 posts
Posted on 9/28/26 at 8:02 pm to
Evidence?
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1866 posts
Posted on 9/28/26 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

Evidence?


That you’re a dumbass? That is self evident.
Posted by DustyDinkleman
Here
Member since Feb 2012
20736 posts
Posted on 9/28/26 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

But if that is the explanation, how is that not evolution?


Evolution didn’t occur in 4000 years
Posted by Swamp Angel
West Georgia Chicken Farm Territory
Member since Jul 2004
10692 posts
Posted on 9/28/26 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

inherited variation, mutation, selection, reproductive isolation, and speciation. Those are evolutionary mechanisms.

Is oit necessarily evolution, or could it simply be selective breeding? There's a whole lot that can happen in a "few thousand years" that we don't understand or have records of. Machu Piccu? Stonehenge? Pyramids?

What would lead one to believe that the magic formula for life to "evolve" is millions of years of time? It seems almost like believing in alchemy or witchcraft to adhere to a belief that mud mixed with carbon and oxygen just happened to one day "evolve" into a living organism that could reproduce itself. And even more absurd when one tries to explain that sexual reproduction evolved from asexual organisms. But again, the magical ingredient seems to always be "time."
Posted by backbone
Colorado
Member since Jul 2026
646 posts
Posted on 9/28/26 at 9:07 pm to
Just because you look like an ape dragging knuckles doesn’t mean there’s a missing link.
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1866 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Logic would say they would become 2-celled organisms before they became complex organisms. There are no 2-celled organisms or even 3-celled organisms.


Good lord. This betrays exactly how little you understand about biology. You’re way out of your depth.
Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
7330 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Good lord. This betrays exactly how little you understand about biology. You’re way out of your depth.
Sweet rebuttal. You really make a good argument, professor.
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1866 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Sweet rebuttal.


There’s literally nothing to rebut. Your post is a completely nonsensical straw man.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram