- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Turning 40 sucks: Do these Vuity eye drops work if you don't want to get reading glasses?
Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:29 am to White Bear
Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:29 am to White Bear
quote:
Sounds to me like you’re a pussy.
Hmmm. I’m not too sure about that. Actually you sound more like of a pussy than he does.
This post was edited on 8/23/23 at 8:40 am
Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:34 am to rickgrimes
I tried the vuity drops and it worked better than i expected. Its not for everybody, but early 40s with no distance correction is probably the best situation for it. It doesnt affect your lens like somebody said earlier, it constricts your pupils. So it would not be good to use at night, but you get about 8 hours out of it so probably enough to get through a work day if you dont do a ton of reading. It can give you some headaches at first when adjusting to it. Its not a perfect solution but good for some situations.
The funny thing is its just pilocarpine, which has been around forever for constricting pupils, which can improve near vision as a side effect. Somebody got smart and marketed it as a miracle reading vision cure under a new name and slightly different % and charging 5x more for it
The funny thing is its just pilocarpine, which has been around forever for constricting pupils, which can improve near vision as a side effect. Somebody got smart and marketed it as a miracle reading vision cure under a new name and slightly different % and charging 5x more for it

This post was edited on 8/23/23 at 8:46 am
Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:40 am to TigerCoon
Went to my first eye doctor appointment at 47, thinking I just needed something to help with reading/computer monitor. But otherwise, I was certain my vision was pretty good, driving et al...
Dr recommended something a little more "robust" for driving, reading, working,living, etc
First time I had them on, driving down the freeway, holy shite I had no idea how used to I had become of shite vision. You don't realize it
Dr recommended something a little more "robust" for driving, reading, working,living, etc
First time I had them on, driving down the freeway, holy shite I had no idea how used to I had become of shite vision. You don't realize it
Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:42 am to rickgrimes
Have you tried eating carrots?
Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:48 am to highcotton2
quote:
Please tell me you are not an actual eye dr.
There absolutely is a surgery for this.
That's the replacement of the lense with an artificial one, right?
My understanding of the 40+ readers thing is not the muscles around the lense, but the lense itself gets less flexible.
I'm 54 and well into a decade with readers. I hate and it and now even my far sight is going bad. I may have to break down and get real glasses.
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:03 am to Notclamdip
quote:
That's the replacement of the lense with an artificial one, right?
Two people I know had a mono vision laser surgery done. One eye is for near vision and the other is for distance. Sounds like it would be terrible but they both said it worked great after they got used to it. Now they don’t even think about it. They wore a contact in each eye for about a week to see if they would like it before the surgery. Said it took about 3 days to adjust.
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:07 am to lsufan9193969700
quote:
I'm 46 and can see perfectly
Not for long
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:08 am to rickgrimes
Just get some cheap readers at Walgreens and keep several pairs around the house in spots you frequent. It's the new normal for you. Took me until I was 46 to figure out I needed to do that. If that's the worst thing to happen to you at 40, count your blessings.
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:12 am to fallguy_1978
quote:
Made it to almost 45 before I broke down and got some reading glasses. I'll go see the eye doctor at some point
I'm still fighting the good fight at 45, but quickly losing the battle.

Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:23 am to rickgrimes
I have no clue, but the cataract surgery was life changing. Game changer for me. One eye was bad and had both done with the multi focus lens. UNBELIEVABLE
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:29 am to Centinel
quote:
I'm still fighting the good fight at 45, but quickly losing the battle
It was like a light switch almost. I think I was mixing some Roundup and I couldn’t remember the ratio and realized I couldn't read shite on the back of that bottle anymore

This post was edited on 8/23/23 at 9:29 am
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:30 am to rickgrimes
You poor child. Enjoy what you have - you're only half way to my situation when things really fall apart.
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:33 am to rickgrimes
40? It’s about to rain pussy.
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:35 am to rickgrimes
I had no issues at all at 40.
I felt 25. Could do anything. Vision perfect. No aches or pains.
50. Ok
52. It’s like a bomb if dysfunction went off. Random issues that are transient. God forbid I work on computer a few hours then go drive. Can’t read signs hardly. And forget being able to function w a head cold. I am down a day
I felt 25. Could do anything. Vision perfect. No aches or pains.
50. Ok
52. It’s like a bomb if dysfunction went off. Random issues that are transient. God forbid I work on computer a few hours then go drive. Can’t read signs hardly. And forget being able to function w a head cold. I am down a day
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:38 am to EvrybodysAllAmerican
quote:this seems counterintuitive. My eyesight is dismal in low light. Forget reading a damn menu in a dim restaurant
It doesnt affect your lens like somebody said earlier, it constricts your pupils.
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:39 am to selfgen
quote:why you so hateful?
selfgen
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:43 am to tigerfoot
quote:
My eyesight is dismal in low light.
Same. I've always worn glasses but a couple years ago got progressive lenses. I don't care and I know it sounds vain but there is no way I'm wearing bifocals in my 40s.
Posted on 8/23/23 at 9:51 am to Pechon
quote:I can get by without readers for 95 percent of my day. Some things are real trouble. Like tying light line in a small eye hook. I just suffer.
don't care and I know it sounds vain but there is no way I'm wearing bifocals in my 40s
I have about 12 pairs of readers hidden around my house. I can never find em. If I had 50 I still wouldn’t have access. I am not prepared
Posted on 8/23/23 at 10:57 am to LSU alum wannabe
quote:
Or pay for LASIK if you’re eyes can benefit from it.
I already had Lasik done many years ago. My distant vision is fine. It is the upclose stuff that I have problem with, which comes from aging (presybyopia), and Lasik can't fix that.
Posted on 8/23/23 at 11:01 am to Cdawg
quote:
Just a heads up but I was 45 and my vision went from prefect to needing readers in a matter of about 3-4 weeks. It comes on pretty quick.
This! It seemingly happened overnight over a period of just a month for me.

Popular
Back to top
