- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trial set to begin in murder of Austin Metcalf by Karmelo Anthony; Verdict is GUILTY
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:41 am to Dragula
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:41 am to Dragula
quote:
every rational person
These are the operative words.
A lot of irrational motherfrickers are out there claiming self defense and/or that the state didn’t prove their case.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:44 am to teke184
quote:
A lot of irrational motherfrickers are out there claiming self defense and/or that the state didn’t prove their case.
I've even seen some claims of a "secret tape" proving the false narrative that Anthony was jumped.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:45 am to jdd48
quote:
even seen some claims of a "secret tape" proving the false narrative that Anthony was jumped.
Someone posted a video the other day and there was a black guy saying he was in the courtroom and it clearly showed 4 guys jumping him before he stabbed Metcalf in self defense and fled.
Every other report about the video is it's blurry but clearly shows a one on one encounter. That escalated very quickly.
They're just making shite up at this point.
This post was edited on 6/9/26 at 10:47 am
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:46 am to LSUBoo
quote:
quote:
Red Stick Tigress is saying Karmelo should be expecting to go home today
His new home for his life without parole maybe.
Most people in OT have reading comprehension deficits.
I stated that the Metcalf kid should have gotten assistance from an adult because 17 y.o. boys aren't going to listen to other 17 y.o. boys.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:46 am to Srbtiger06
quote:
They're just making shite up at this point.
At this point? They have constantly been making shite up to justify their position that the Dindu Nuffin was justified.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:47 am to JoeyP239
quote:
He will get manslaughter. Very little chance you get a first degree murder conviction over this. You would have needed the guy to stab him multiple times to get that and show intent to kill him.
Obviously not exactly the same, but I'd compare this to the Ahmaud Arbery case. The person who introduces lethal force to a totally non-lethal or even violent situation will get punished harshly more often than not.
Anthony's only hope is that he gets sympathy votes from the jury, which is certainly possible.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:48 am to teke184
quote:
They have constantly been making shite up to justify their position that the Dindu Nuffin was justified.
Pre-trial there was at least a possibility it happened the way they claimed. Now that the evidence has been seen and reported on there's no doubt.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:52 am to Srbtiger06
quote:They've always been making shite up. In every case, for generations.
They're just making shite up at this point.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:54 am to blueboy
quote:
Wirskye then began to explain the jury charge.
"We have alleged two ways to commit murder," Wirskye said. "You don't have to agree on which method: intentional or clearly dangerous act, as long as the state has proven it, and it's unanimous."
When speaking about the lesser included offense, Wirskye said, "You don't even reach manslaughter unless all of you acquit him of murder."
"If you think Austin impaled himself on Karmelo's knife, I don't know what to tell you," Wirskye said. "Find him guilty of manslaughter."
Wirskye then explained four reasons why the defense's self-defense theory does not apply: provocation, force disparity, reasonable belief, and immediate necessity. He explained that "you don't get to provoke someone," and that "you can't meet force (a shove) with deadly force (with a stab)."
He also argued that Karmelo had no reason to believe that he was in danger, saying, "I submit to you any prudent person would not have plunged a knife into Austin's chest."
Wirskye again reminded the jury that Karmelo had a "secret knife" on the day of the stabbing, and said that Austin had no defensive wounds because he "never saw it coming."
He told the jury that Karmelo had a "guilty mindset" because of the way in which he fled after the stabbing.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:56 am to Srbtiger06
It’s going to be 2. Manslaughter. 5 years in prison with chance of parole.
There wasn’t any clear videos of it and a pretty murky witness account of everything happened really fast and it was kind of a shove/push/grab thing after some words.
Parents can probably do another civil suit for other things after this. Just my opinion.
There wasn’t any clear videos of it and a pretty murky witness account of everything happened really fast and it was kind of a shove/push/grab thing after some words.
Parents can probably do another civil suit for other things after this. Just my opinion.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:57 am to olddawg26
The prosecutor pointing out that manslaughter isn’t on the table unless murder reached an acquittal (unanimous not guilty) makes this harder to pull off.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:58 am to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
I stated that the Metcalf kid should have gotten assistance from an adult because 17 y.o. boys aren't going to listen to other 17 y.o. boys.
When are you going to stop justifying behavior as if you're somehow being rational. There are plenty of respectful 17 year olds that would have no issue, in fact , IF their parents taught them how to behave in society they wouldn't even put themselves in that damn position in the first place.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:00 am to teke184
It's gone to the jury and they are now in deliberations. I expect they'll wrap this up in an hour and get out for lunch. They should, anyways.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:00 am to olddawg26
quote:
It’s going to be 2. Manslaughter. 5 years in prison with chance of parole.
This is an open and shut murder case in Texas. There's really not even a question, and the Defense barely put up a fight
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:01 am to olddawg26
quote:oh they ONE HUNDRED PERCENT will. probably already written up.
Parents can probably do another civil suit for other things after this.
can't leave any penny unturned and that gofundme has run its course.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:02 am to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
I stated that the Metcalf kid should have gotten assistance from an adult because 17 y.o. boys aren't going to listen to other 17 y.o. boys.
Oh lawdy
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:02 am to teke184
quote:
The prosecutor pointing out that manslaughter isn’t on the table unless murder reached an acquittal (unanimous not guilty) makes this harder to pull off.
What happens if all the jurors think he's guilty, but they can't agree on murder or manslaughter?
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:03 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
I expect they'll wrap this up in an hour and get out for lunch. They should, anyways.
I'd bet there's at least one soft-hearted person on the jury that holds things up because of his demographics.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:03 am to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
I stated that the Metcalf kid should have gotten assistance from an adult because 17 y.o. boys aren't going to listen to other 17 y.o. boys.
Especially not 17 year old entitled thug who triggers the encounter knowing the concealed advantage he would have in any confrontation he was able to instigate.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:04 am to Witty_Username
Hung jury, which means the judge tells them to work harder to reach a decision and may eventually declare a mistrial.
I don’t see the state letting this go if there is a mistrial due to the strength of the case, so there would be a new trial.
I don’t see the state letting this go if there is a mistrial due to the strength of the case, so there would be a new trial.
Popular
Back to top



1











