Started By
Message

Trees vs CO2 in the atmosphere

Posted on 3/22/25 at 2:02 pm
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
23001 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 2:02 pm

Playing with AI on this.

The average tree consumes about 30 pounds of CO2 per year.

There are about 3 trillion trees on Earth.

Human CO2 emissions are estimated to be about 33B metric tons per year.

Our planet is getting greener.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
18992 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 2:28 pm to
But did you factor in the cow farts to your equation?
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
22310 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 2:30 pm to
If you really want to laugh, look at CO2 absorption rates of plant life in shallow water. It’s off the charts per acre vs trees.
Posted by holdem Tiger
Member since Oct 2007
1139 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 2:31 pm to
Trees don’t consume CO2. They trap it temporarily.
Posted by Mushroom1968
Member since Jun 2023
3616 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 2:34 pm to
I’ve had conversations with trees before
Posted by Zgeo
Baja Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2021
2236 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 2:55 pm to
What about chili with beans? Did you account for that?
Posted by shoestring
Member since Nov 2012
332 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 3:05 pm to
You'll have to explain this one.
This post was edited on 3/22/25 at 3:07 pm
Posted by Cfrobel
Member since Nov 2019
312 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

Trees don’t consume CO2. They trap it temporarily.


Right, carbon isn't really reduced until the subduction process sends the deposits back into the mantle.
This post was edited on 3/23/25 at 1:05 am
Posted by holdem Tiger
Member since Oct 2007
1139 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 3:17 pm to
Growing trees convert CO2 into wood. Mature trees don’t absorb much CO2 at all. And rotting trees return all of the carbon back to air.

No carbon is destroyed, and trees aren’t very good at long term sequestration.
Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
2218 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 3:57 pm to
So how about just burying trees then?
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
39711 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Our planet is getting greener.


The utilization of fossil fuels such as coal, crude oil, and natural gas have resulted in the greatest re-forestation period since man kind has been on this planet.
Posted by Cfrobel
Member since Nov 2019
312 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

So how about just burying trees then?


That approach definitely worked during the Carboniferous period.
Posted by FutureCorridor49
US 90
Member since May 2023
536 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

I’ve had conversations with trees before

quote:

Mushroom1968


Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
1898 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 4:28 pm to
Between 2010 and 2020, the net loss in forests globally was 4.7 million hectares per year.

- Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
23001 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 5:28 pm to
This is one of my favorites, but there are bunches of this type of demonstrations on internet.

Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1411 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

The average tree consumes about 30 pounds of CO2 per year.

There are about 3 trillion trees on Earth.

Human CO2 emissions are estimated to be about 33B metric tons per year.

Our planet is getting greener.


That’s nice, dear.

Posted by Cfrobel
Member since Nov 2019
312 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

This is one of my favorites, but there are bunches of this type of demonstrations on internet.


I guess it's great for photosynthetic lifeforms, I am sure Cyanobacteria will feast. Take a look at the results of the Permian-Triassic Extinction Event if you want a glimpse of how it might go for most of us.
Posted by Saunson69
Member since May 2023
6313 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 6:50 pm to
Yes, Trees absorb CO2 during growth. When they die, they release it back. I'm not if they take in more than release when die or not.

An interesting process is biomass energy. Plant 10 trillion trees, let them absorb CO2, then chop them down and burn to create biomass energy. You'd have to put carbon capture and sequestration on the Biomass energy. Expensive process compared to nat gas turbines.
This post was edited on 3/22/25 at 6:52 pm
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
23001 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

That’s nice, dear.


That's a very poor place to measure CO2.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
30468 posts
Posted on 3/22/25 at 9:16 pm to
Why’s that? It’s not influenced by local pockets of pollution and higher where levels have stabilized giving a better picture of the average
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram