Started By
Message

re: Toyota issues recall, stop sale on 100,000 Tundra pickup trucks due to engine failures

Posted on 5/31/24 at 7:58 am to
Posted by Warmouth
Denver
Member since May 2024
152 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 7:58 am to
Toyota trucks fall apart.

Nothing new.
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
15876 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 8:09 am to
My 2013 still running strong
Posted by CobraCommander83
Member since Feb 2017
12307 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 8:15 am to
quote:

I'll probably get a midsized next time, mostly due to cost and having adult children. I'd probably buy a Colorado/Canyon if I had to get one today, but my F150 doesn't need replacing anytime soon. I'll see what's available when the time comes. I just refuse to pay the price of the new full sized, and I'll have less need for one in a year or two.


I have a ‘21 Ranger with the FX2 and it has been a solid truck for me so far. The 2.3 turbo 4 cylinder in it has pretty good power. I’m getting around 24.5 to 25 mpg. I thought about getting a Tacoma or Frontier but I just paid off my truck and with truck prices, I’m going to hang on to it for as long as I can.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
53122 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 8:20 am to
quote:

I thought about getting a Tacoma or Frontier but I just paid off my truck and with truck prices, I’m going to hang on to it for as long as I can

I'll probably drive my current F150 until it falls apart. It's been a solid truck for me for 7 years. I'm not willing to spend more than 30 something on a vehicle. They just aren't worth any more than that to me.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26444 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Meh Tundra owners hate the new tundra


I figured a lot of them were waiting for the next gen model only to be disappointed. I’ve seen a lot of them piling up at dealerships.

Judging from the sales numbers, I think Toyota loyalists are the only ones buying the new Sequoia.

They put a lot of effort into the GX and LX. But the Tundra and Sequoia are a huge disappointment. They will probably rush a mild redesign on them within a year or so to correct some of their weird design issues.
Posted by XenScott
Pensacola
Member since Oct 2016
4027 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 8:35 am to
If it’s a manufacturing defect theGX and LX are good. They are JDM.
Posted by slacker130
Your mom
Member since Jul 2010
8943 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:01 am to
Glad I bought a '19. I don't want turbos.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40826 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:06 am to
My 23 isn't effected thankfully. Looks like it is mainly in the non hybrid motor.

The new gen Tundra Facebook groups are pretty hot right now
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40826 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Toyota trucks fall apart.

Nothing new.


Well this is a bad take

It actually is something new.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
7751 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:11 am to
Immediately after this is resolved will probably be a great time to buy
Posted by Don Quixote
Member since May 2023
4220 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Meh Tundra owners hate the new tundra


long time Tundra driver, I wouldn't say "hate" but certainly won't touch a recent Tundra or 4Runner since they dropped V8
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
53122 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:13 am to
quote:

The new gen Tundra Facebook groups are pretty hot right now

I'd be pretty pissed too if I bought a brand-new 50-70k truck that had to have the engine rebuilt.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33078 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:24 am to
quote:

I don't remember if it's the Colorado /Canyon or Tacoma, but one of them gets worse gas mileage with the 4 cyl turbo than the previous gen V6. The 2.7 F150 gets about 1mpg better than the 5.0. It's really nothing, or close to nothing for most people.


That 2.7L V6 Ford and the 2.7L I-4 Turbomax Chevrolet are both really good motors. They've cracked the code around reliable turbocharged pickup engines. That's what happens when you are a massive company that can throw tons of cash around on engineering and production. It's a lot harder for Mazda or even Nissan to do the same.

None of those smaller displacement turbo motors are significantly more efficient than the larger displacement naturally aspirated motors they replaced. And I suspect both of those engines (the GM and the Ford) costs substantially more to develop and build than 1990s or 2000's era V8s, even adjusting for inflation. These turbo motors are entirely a government compliance thing.

Since they are more expensive to produce (and thus more expensive to purchase) and don't offer a fuel economy advantage....the least Toyota can do is to ensure that their very expensive trucks and SUVs are at least as reliable as they were in the past. I think they are trying to do that, but they are learning a very tough lesson in global parts commonality: If it's a bad part, you've got a global problem.
Posted by slacker130
Your mom
Member since Jul 2010
8943 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:25 am to
quote:

I'd be pretty pissed too if I bought a brand-new 50-70k truck that had to have the engine rebuilt.



I'd be losing my mind.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
136301 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:29 am to
quote:

'd be pretty pissed too if I bought a brand-new 50-70k truck that had to have the engine rebuilt.


Lemon law it
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40826 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:29 am to
O for sure, I would be too. Hate it for them, but just glad mines not effected. As bad as it sounds because it's a big issue, but at least they are going to make it right.

Glad I went with the hybrid version. I needed more power for towing and I was semi worried about going with it because of the hybrid. I figured if one of the two motors would have had issues, it would have been the hybrid. I'm at 26k miles with no issues, hopefully it stays that way.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33078 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:34 am to
quote:

long time Tundra driver, I wouldn't say "hate" but certainly won't touch a recent Tundra or 4Runner since they dropped V8



The V6 in the current 2023 4Runner has been around for almost 20 years.

But I get what you are saying....the new 4Runner is switching to a turbo 4 cylinder only powerplant. And Toyota is proving that they are not immune to serious design or manufacturing flaws.

100,000 Tundras over a 15 month period is likely over 70% of all of the trucks made in that time. That's an astounding failure.

I imagine they'll drain the oil on those recalled trucks and cut the filter open to inspect for metal debris/shavings. If they find any, the truck doesn't leave the shop until it gets a new engine block. If they don't find any, they truck gets sent back to the owners with fresh oil and some peace of mind for the people who depend on them.

In most states, a 30 day period at the dealership for the same issue usually triggers some lemon laws and buy backs. An engine block replacement is a long repair not even including a potential backlog in parts. That will likely bump up against those lemon law requirements pretty easily.

General Motors had that problem a few years ago with some of those 8 speed transmissions in their full sized trucks. They sort of swapped the transmission fluid as a temp fix and sent the customers on their way until they had enough parts to start replacing/rebuilding the transmission. Meanwhile, they quietly did some design changes and had new parts numbers on newer 8 speed transmissions but still never officially admitted that they had a design problem with the original one. Like we know they did SOMETHING to fix it in the newer ones....why do that if the old ones weren't flawed?

Ford has done even shadier stuff with the powerstroke diesel (still do), 10 speed transmissions in their F-150s/Expeditions, and the cam phaser problems with their earlier turbo motors. They've actually had a lot of issues lately with their trucks and Explorer SUV's. Their quality lately has been in the dumpster, but is slowly improving again after all of those parts problems with the pandemic. They are getting a lot of heat now for that and their major price increases.
Posted by slacker130
Your mom
Member since Jul 2010
8943 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Lemon law it



From what I've seen, those laws seem tough to actually qualify for. I had a coworker with a Dodge 2500 that lived in the shop for months. Spent more time with the dealer than with them in the first 6 months and they had a hard time "lemon law-ing" the truck. Eventually, corporate got involved and worked something out that they were satisfied with. Not sure the details.
Posted by Dragula
Laguna Seca
Member since Jun 2020
6523 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Lemon law it


Does not qualify
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
53122 posts
Posted on 5/31/24 at 9:39 am to
quote:

That 2.7L V6 Ford and the 2.7L I-4 Turbomax Chevrolet are both really good motors

I drive a 2.7 F150. It's been good for me, and I have a coworker that has right at 200k on his.

I just don't think they offer many advantages over the V8s they are replacing. At least they have proven they are able to make them reliable. It just pisses me off that the government is basically driving all of the manufacturers to do this at little to no benefit to the consumer.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram