- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: There seems to be some discrepancies regarding face masks
Posted on 6/25/20 at 11:14 pm to bigberg2000
Posted on 6/25/20 at 11:14 pm to bigberg2000
quote:
It’s not complicated.
Seems to be. People are selfish and arrogant. Ignorantly arrogant.
Breaks my heart. Most of these descend from people, who, were they alive, would slap them upside the head.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 11:18 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
You didn’t google properly
If the link is correct, than I stand by my initial post.
If your hands may be contaminated with the virus by touching your mask, where does the virus go if you have no mask. Logically, this makes no sense.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 11:23 pm to borotiger
Maybe next time learn how to look up things properly before screaming fake news and bans.
FYI reverse searching an image is not reliable at all
FYI reverse searching an image is not reliable at all
Posted on 6/25/20 at 11:30 pm to WaydownSouth
You are correct, masks on a healthy individual is not necessary. The virus will usually fall to a surface, contaminating that surface. People touch that contaminated surface and then rub their eyes(Mucus Membrane) and then acquire the virus. Masks become contaminated, the individual readjust the contaminated masks, rubs eyes gets the virus. Keeping out of individual personal space and washing your hands are better ways slow this virus down.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 11:38 pm to meansonny
quote:
Surgeons, doctors, nurses, techs, and dentists are such dumbasses. Sheeple.
You should feel dumb for this one.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 11:42 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
Maybe next time learn how to look up things properly before screaming fake news and bans.
Fair.
I did go to the Danish Health Services website and did not see this. For that, I apologize.
That said, it is still not logical which is what my misguided rant was based on.
If wearing a mask is bad because the virus may be on it and touching it may contaminate your hands and then you may touch your face, how is the virus, if not wearing a mask,not landing on your face? It is not logical.
Perhaps it is a gross error in translation on their part.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 11:49 pm to borotiger
quote:
wearing a mask is bad because the virus may be on it and touching it may contaminate your hands and then you may touch your face, how is the virus, if not wearing a mask,not landing on your face? It is not logical.
Those who don't wear a mask must wash their face when they wash their hands. It is in the Danish website.
Posted on 6/25/20 at 11:57 pm to meansonny
quote:
Those who don't wear a mask must wash their face when they wash their hands. It is in the Danish website
That does not satisfy my question.
If the concern is that the mask itself may be contaminated, than at least it captured some of the contagion. If that is the hypothesis, then your face would replace the surface that would have been the mask.
Posted on 6/26/20 at 12:04 am to borotiger
Correct.
And when you wash your hands, you must thoroughly wash your face at the same time.
And when you wash your hands, you must thoroughly wash your face at the same time.
Posted on 6/26/20 at 12:10 am to meansonny
quote:
And when you wash your hands, you must thoroughly wash your face at the same time.
We've gone full circle.
The OP was that masks increased the risk because the mask may be contaminated. If washing your hands and face is good, how would wearing a mask, while also washing your hands and face, be worse?
Don't say that it's because the mask may be contaminated unless you also recommend washing your face continuously.
Posted on 6/26/20 at 12:11 am to LSUDAN1
quote:
Healthy people wearing mask are people who depend on others to make decisions for them.
Like the ones being forced to by their employers, who are being forced to by the government.
This post was edited on 6/26/20 at 12:12 am
Posted on 6/26/20 at 12:12 am to lsupride87
quote:
Everyone knows Scandinavians are dumb
Oh wait
I mean, half the time this place rags on socialism whenever anyone brings up one of these countries.
Posted on 6/26/20 at 12:17 am to Misnomer
quote:
Like the ones being forced to by their employers, who are being forced to be the government.
I know of no private,non-government contract related, company forced to wear masks because of the "government ".
I know of many, mine included, that mandate it for health safety reasons. By health safety, I mean legal risk mitigation.
ETA: the above is incorrect. Many states and counties have mandated the use of masks. My statement was related to companies, not national or local order.
This post was edited on 6/26/20 at 1:04 am
Posted on 6/26/20 at 12:45 am to GeauxWrek
quote:
Then why are all these cities and counties requiring them?
If all the cities jumped off a bridge would you? If all the counties said they could run trains on your wife would you let them?
What a stupid fricking argument.
Posted on 6/26/20 at 1:05 am to RollTide1987
Somebody cherry picked those. For example, the Danes also say:
LINK
quote:
During a transitional period with increased infection pressure, and based on the precautionary principle, you might consider using a mouth or face mask in certain situations, such as prolonged or frequent close face-to-face contacts with customers/clients, etc. You might also consider using a mouth or face mask if you are a person at higher risk of severe illness from COVID-19 and cannot avoid situations where you get very close to others, for example, if you have to take public transport during rush hour.
LINK
Posted on 6/26/20 at 2:16 am to Dandy Lion
quote:
The reason is called respect.
Frick respect. There’s a huge relationship between those demanding facemasks for public health and ‘respect’ and the protestors and rioters. Hardly any single damn government, media member, etc. that has been demanding masks has also gone public to demand the protestors stop until the pandemic is over.
Masks are fine, social distancing is better. It’s physically impossible to pass on a virus to others if you don’t have contact with them.
Furthermore, there’s a lot of anecdotal data that a vast majority of cases are spread by ‘super spreaders’. People that are very sick spreading it to a lot of people. I’m in the belief this will likely come out more and more, given the vast amount of cases of family members not passing it on to others in their own household. It’s very possible it comes out that a large amount of the virus is needed to be passed on to others to make them sick, and therefore asymptomatic people while still possible to spread the virus are most likely very rarely doing so.
But hey, let’s respect the media’s BS they are feeding us right?
This post was edited on 6/26/20 at 2:17 am
Posted on 6/26/20 at 5:57 am to GeauxWrek
quote:
Then why are all these cities and counties requiring them? Please provide any links to support you claims
Because politicians are assholes are typically not that intelligent. Do you really need a link for that?
Posted on 6/26/20 at 7:20 pm to WaydownSouth
quote:
borotiger
Hang him and put his body on display.
Popular
Back to top


0






