- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Rise and Fall of Nations (1000-2025)
Posted on 4/4/25 at 8:45 am
Posted on 4/4/25 at 8:45 am
Inspired by the map of Europe thread from the year 1000, I asked ChatGPT to list out a subjective Top 5 of the most powerful nations of each century, starting in the 1000s and working our way into the present day. Here is what the AI spat out:
11th century (1000-1099)
1. Song Dynasty (China)
2. Fatimid Caliphate (North Africa & Sicily)
3. Byzantine Empire
4. Ghaznavid Empire (Persia & Northern India)
5. Holy Roman Empire
12th Century (1100-1199)
1. Song Dynasty (China)
2. Abbasid Caliphate/Seljuk Empire
3. Byzantine Empire
4. Ghurid Empire (Afghanistan & India)
5. Alomad Caliphate (North Africa & Iberia)
13th Century (1200-1299)
1. Mongol Empire
2. Yuan Dynasty (Mongol China)
3. Delhi Sultanate
4. Mamluk Sultanate (Egypt & Syria)
5. Kingdom of France
14th Century (1300-1399)
1. Mamluk Sultanate
2. Yuan Dynasty
3. Delhi Sultanate
4. Ottoman Beylik (rising Ottoman Empire)
5. Kingdom of France
15th Century (1400-1499)
1. Ming Dynasty (China)
2. Ottoman Empire
3. Spanish Kingdoms (Castille & Aragon)
4. Timurid Empire
5. Kingdom of Portugal
16th Century (1500-1599)
1. Spanish Empire
2. Ottoman Empire
3. Ming Dynasty
4. Portuguese Empire
5. Mughal Empire (India)
17th Century (1600-1699)
1. Mughal Empire
2. Kingdom of France
3. Ottoman Empire
4. Qing Dynasty (China)
5. Dutch Republic
18th Century (1700-1799)
1. Great Britain
2. Qing Dynasty
3. Kingdom of France
4. Mughal Empire
5. Russian Empire
19th Century (1800-1899)
1. British Empire
2. French Empire / France
3. Qing Dynasty
4. Russian Empire
5. United States of America
20th Century (1900-1999)
1. United States of America
2. Soviet Union (Russia)
3. United Kingdom
4. Germany
5. China
21st Century (2000-Present)
1. United States of America
2. People's Republic of China
3. Germany
4. Russian Federation
5. India
Lots of change on here.
As far as the 21st Century goes, ChatGPT had the European Union ranked #3, but since Germany essentially runs that organization (and since the EU isn't a country), I decided to rank Germany in the third position in lieu of the EU.
11th century (1000-1099)
1. Song Dynasty (China)
2. Fatimid Caliphate (North Africa & Sicily)
3. Byzantine Empire
4. Ghaznavid Empire (Persia & Northern India)
5. Holy Roman Empire
12th Century (1100-1199)
1. Song Dynasty (China)
2. Abbasid Caliphate/Seljuk Empire
3. Byzantine Empire
4. Ghurid Empire (Afghanistan & India)
5. Alomad Caliphate (North Africa & Iberia)
13th Century (1200-1299)
1. Mongol Empire
2. Yuan Dynasty (Mongol China)
3. Delhi Sultanate
4. Mamluk Sultanate (Egypt & Syria)
5. Kingdom of France
14th Century (1300-1399)
1. Mamluk Sultanate
2. Yuan Dynasty
3. Delhi Sultanate
4. Ottoman Beylik (rising Ottoman Empire)
5. Kingdom of France
15th Century (1400-1499)
1. Ming Dynasty (China)
2. Ottoman Empire
3. Spanish Kingdoms (Castille & Aragon)
4. Timurid Empire
5. Kingdom of Portugal
16th Century (1500-1599)
1. Spanish Empire
2. Ottoman Empire
3. Ming Dynasty
4. Portuguese Empire
5. Mughal Empire (India)
17th Century (1600-1699)
1. Mughal Empire
2. Kingdom of France
3. Ottoman Empire
4. Qing Dynasty (China)
5. Dutch Republic
18th Century (1700-1799)
1. Great Britain
2. Qing Dynasty
3. Kingdom of France
4. Mughal Empire
5. Russian Empire
19th Century (1800-1899)
1. British Empire
2. French Empire / France
3. Qing Dynasty
4. Russian Empire
5. United States of America
20th Century (1900-1999)
1. United States of America
2. Soviet Union (Russia)
3. United Kingdom
4. Germany
5. China
21st Century (2000-Present)
1. United States of America
2. People's Republic of China
3. Germany
4. Russian Federation
5. India
Lots of change on here.
As far as the 21st Century goes, ChatGPT had the European Union ranked #3, but since Germany essentially runs that organization (and since the EU isn't a country), I decided to rank Germany in the third position in lieu of the EU.
2
Posted on 4/4/25 at 8:55 am to RollTide1987
quote:
19th Century (1800-1899)
1. British Empire
2. French Empire / France
3. Qing Dynasty
4. Russian Empire
5. United States of America
Are you positing that the US was more powerful than the Ottoman Empire during this time? What about Austrian Empire?
I feel like there had to be at least one more nation more powerful throughout the 1800’s than the US, essentially knocking us out of the top 5. We still were fighting the native Americans, we having to fight the Mexicans, had a vicious civil war, exhibited little to no influence outside of the North American continent, and were still fiercely isolationist until the very end of this century.
Eta
This topic is awesome. Thanks for posting it.
Eta2
Clarified my point.
This post was edited on 4/4/25 at 9:15 am
Posted on 4/4/25 at 8:58 am to RollTide1987
Cool! I’m always fascinated to see which eras were concurrent since we were taught a lot of this stuff in such a linear manner. There is a cool chart showing this sort of thing called histomap I think would be cool to have in the house to peruse in moments of boredom or curiosity. You can order them on Amazon and Etsy.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 9:01 am to When in Rome
That's an awesome chart!
Posted on 4/4/25 at 9:01 am to When in Rome
I want one of those.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 9:07 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Are you positing that the US was more powerful than the Ottoman Empire during this time? What about Austrian Empire?
I feel like there had to be at least one nation more powerful throughout the 1800’s than the US. We still were fighting the native Americans, we having to fight the Mexicans, had a vicious civil war, exhibited little to no influence outside of the North American continent, and were still fiercely isolationist until the very end of this century.
American power in the 1800s was entirely due to its distance. If we had ever faced the British at the strength Napoleon faced, it'd have been a very different story for us in 1812 The US military could barely even beat itself at 30% strength.
We would've been no match whatsoever for the Austrians and later the Germans post-unification at least until WW1 when spending was ramped up tremendously. Not that we couldn't have done it beforehand, but we had no need.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 9:11 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Are you positing that the US was more powerful than the Ottoman Empire during this time? What about Austrian Empire?
I am not positing that, the AI is positing that. However, I do agree with it. By the mid-19th century, the United States of America was the second largest economy in the world behind only Britain. By the end of the century we had definitely come into our own as a global power. The Ottoman Empire was a shadow of its former self all throughout the 19th century and the Austrian Empire had begun its decline, largely due to the Napoleonic Wars and rise of Germany.
This post was edited on 4/4/25 at 9:12 am
Posted on 4/4/25 at 9:13 am to Bama Bird
I meant to say one more nation more powerful that the US, meaning it wouldn’t have been too 5 in the 19th century.
Poor sentence structure on my part.
Poor sentence structure on my part.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 9:16 am to Bama Bird
quote:
American power in the 1800s was entirely due to its distance. If we had ever faced the British at the strength Napoleon faced, it'd have been a very different story for us in 1812 The US military could barely even beat itself at 30% strength.
You are focusing almost entirely on the United States of the early-19th century and ignoring that a century lasts 100 years and that the U.S. of 1899 was a far cry from what it was in 1812. By the end of the 19th century the United States was indeed among the strongest powers on the planet. It was an economic giant that could go toe to toe with any nation on the planet.
Yeah, our military spending wasn't what the rest of the world's was, but that's because we were still mostly isolationist and only concerned with affairs in our hemisphere.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 9:20 am to RollTide1987
quote:
You are focusing almost entirely on the United States of the early-19th century and ignoring that a century lasts 100 years and that the U.S. of 1899 was a far cry from what it was in 1812. By the end of the 19th century the United States was indeed among the strongest powers on the planet.
Not arguing with you that we developed into it, but over the entire course of the 19th century, not just the ending, were we one of the top 5 most powerful nations/empires?
Just looking at the histomap the other poster posted, England, France, Germany, Austria, Russia, and the Turks all look to average more control in the 19th century than the US.
Again, completely agree that we ended the century as one, just asking if averaged over 100 years would we be one?
This post was edited on 4/4/25 at 9:24 am
Posted on 4/4/25 at 9:22 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Not arguing with you that we developed into it, but over the entire course of the 19th century, not just the ending, were we one of the top 5 most powerful nations/empires?
I would say yes.
By the 1850s we were an economic powerhouse that beat out every other nation on the planet not named Great Britain. And by 1865 we had the most powerful military on earth but voluntarily demobilized at the end of our civil war. Over the course of the latter half of the 19th century we developed into THE economic power of the world. The only reason why we did not expand that power into our military is because we chose not to spend money on it.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 10:11 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
I want one of those.
I have it on my coffee table. It's excellent. You can get lost in it.
LINK
Posted on 4/4/25 at 10:16 am to When in Rome
I have a feeling that south and Central America are getting shite on historically.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:01 am to When in Rome
Accuracy is much more concise from 1850. The status pre-1850 as per "history" via the Controllers base of allowable "knowledge" can't be confirmed, but only assumed.
That said, the respective charting of "nations," "states," "power", "duration," and empires is spectacular.
That said, the respective charting of "nations," "states," "power", "duration," and empires is spectacular.
This post was edited on 4/4/25 at 11:02 am
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:14 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
I have a feeling that south and Central America are getting shite on historically.
Absolutely.
Same as with the actual pre-colonist history and empires of North and Central America. There is also no mention of Tartaria (Russia and the far east) which was confirmed on pre-18th century maps.
Also,
- Babylon and a slew of other civilizations (some on the chart) pre-date Egypt.
- Phoenicia never actually disappeared. "The Sea People" and their financiers became a stealth mobile power (operating out of their main base in Venice.)
Phoenician aka Babylonians establishing and colonized outposts from northern Europe to Asia to South America. Many believe the Venetians aka the Phoenicians melded with the Roman Empire and actually were the power behind the power. (unacknowledged by mainstream "historians.")
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:15 am to Bama Bird
quote:
American power in the 1800s was entirely due to its distance. If we had ever faced the British at the strength Napoleon faced, it'd have been a very different story for us in 1812 The US military could barely even beat itself at 30% strength. We would've been no match whatsoever for the Austrians and later the Germans post-unification at least until WW1 when spending was ramped up tremendously. Not that we couldn't have done it beforehand, but we had no need.
Are we talking “power” or “military power”?
The United States gained enormous power in the 1800’s
taking over a vast continent…. They exerted strong influence on global trade seeing its GDP rose faster than every other country on the list.
We also fought Britain to a strategic draw, defeated Mexico and Spain.
This post was edited on 4/4/25 at 11:16 am
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:17 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Are you positing that the US was more powerful than the Ottoman Empire during this time? What about Austrian Empire?
After around the 1830's and 40's, we definitely were IMO. The Ottomans and Habsburgs were rotting husks by that point, on their slow crawl to death in WW1. They may have had sheer numbers of soldiers on paper, but both had lost any ability for power projection and prestige by the mid 19th Century.
This post was edited on 4/4/25 at 11:25 am
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:31 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Are you positing that the US was more powerful than the Ottoman Empire during this time? What about Austrian Empire?
Disagree on both counts.
The US was still in its infancy in the 1830s-1840s, being guided by the British East India Company, through specifically the Bank of London.
The Ottoman Empire was still a force while the Habsburgs like many of the European royalty who forged kingdoms through finance, were re-calibrating and re-branding their stolen Empire/Kingdoms. Their kingdom-territory was folded into other "nations-states" by the 1840s and 1850s. ALL of these integrative border changes were negotiated by design and agreement with the other powers at that time of great changes of the entire world.
Are you positing that the US was more powerful than the Ottoman Empire during this time? What about Austrian Empire?
quote:
After around the 1830's and 40's, we definitely were.
The Ottomans and Habsburgs were rotting husks by that point, on their slow crawl to death in WW1.
Disagree on both counts.
The US was still in its infancy in the 1830s-1840s, being guided by the British East India Company, through specifically the Bank of London.
The Ottoman Empire was still a force while the Habsburgs like many of the European royalty who forged kingdoms through finance, were re-calibrating and re-branding their stolen Empire/Kingdoms. Their kingdom-territory was folded into other "nations-states" by the 1840s and 1850s. ALL of these integrative border changes were negotiated by design and agreement with the other powers at that time of great changes of the entire world.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:36 am to When in Rome
That histomap should be on the wall of every history classroom in the US along with the Declaration of Independence IMO.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:53 am to tide06
I like that map too but I used to have a history site 20+ years ago pre wiki with historians and they had many bones to pick with it. Certainly with their countries of course. I seem to remember the Iranian brain child of the place had beef. The general consensus was that it shortened the connection with some "peoples" and exaggerated others. An example I think we're the Greeks and Italics with Rome and China with China 
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News