- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The future of the 8-5, M-F, daily work commute?
Posted on 5/29/24 at 6:50 am to Oates Mustache
Posted on 5/29/24 at 6:50 am to Oates Mustache
I work from home and start my day at 5:30am. My company doesn't track hours but my day is normally pretty much done around 2pm during the school year. Right now the kids are out of school my days are organized a little different.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 7:16 am to AwgustaDawg
quote:this. Many years ago, a VP (guest speaker) from an energy company (our customer) said it point blank at a large business conference . “You think you are special? I can hire three Indians for the cost of one of you.”
That said we all best watch out...if your job in New York can be done from Alabama, for instance, there is usually no reason it can't be done from India.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 7:53 am to AwgustaDawg
quote:
That said we all best watch out...if your job in New York can be done from Alabama, for instance, there is usually no reason it can't be done from India. Short of some sort of security concern tele work can be done from anywhere....for a lot less than it takes to survive in the United States.
this could be the dumbest argument made here, and thats saying a lot...
Posted on 5/29/24 at 8:40 am to BeerMoney
quote:
There are mechanisms for monitoring and managing this remotely. You have to have clear performance expectations and cut people loose when they don’t meet them.
Absolutely. But a large percentage of people suck without on site management. They just do, it’s never going to change. Not everyone can be the top 25% of employees.
Those people will never be able to work from home efficiently or will just float around from job to job.
WFH is here to stay. But this idea it’s for everyone and all offices will be gone is laughable. Companies will have to plan better and not just put a huge office in a shite location or risk employees not wanting to be there.
Not everyone has long commentes. I know plenty of people that go home for lunch 3-4 days a week and work a standard 8-5 job.
ETA: there’s also something to be said to not work at home, and keep your business separate. I think a great schedule is a short commute to a 9-9 type schedule where you have every other Friday off so half the office works every Friday. Hell you could do that with Mondays too. Go in, bang your work out, be with employees, then leave and leave work at work.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 8:45 am
Posted on 5/29/24 at 9:18 am to burger bearcat
I think we're also seeing many office jobs shifting to 4-10s as well.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 9:22 am to 08Tiger
quote:
Leaving our homes to do things we dread with people we really don't like, amost everyday for decades! How have we gotten to this point and is it finally beginning to change?
Yeah. Staying at home by yourself and only interacting with people via Teams or Zoom is WAY better for you.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 9:24 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
Yeah. Staying at home by yourself and only interacting with people via Teams or Zoom is WAY better for you.
I have friends and family. I see them at the gym. We go to lunch. We grab drinks. We have dinner. I belong to some social organizations that have events.
I don't need to go into an office everyday to have social interactions. Your mileage may vary.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 9:29 am to evil cockroach
quote:
this. Many years ago, a VP (guest speaker) from an energy company (our customer) said it point blank at a large business conference . “You think you are special? I can hire three Indians for the cost of one of you.”
You're gonna put 3 indians in front of executive level stakeholders in order to determine the parameters of system changes that need to be made?

Posted on 5/29/24 at 9:32 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
I have friends and family. I see them at the gym. We go to lunch. We grab drinks. We have dinner. I belong to some social organizations that have events.
I don't need to go into an office everyday to have social interactions. Your mileage may vary.
Exactly, I've worked from home for 13 years now and I'd bet I'm more social than most of these people who use the social interaction argument vs remote work.
I don't need work for social engagement, I have a social life outside of work.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 9:42 am to Epic Cajun
Social life? Hell, I try to stay away from as many people as I can.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 9:54 am to WillFerrellisking
The problem with many of these posts, and im guilty as well- is that we should all end our posts with the words “FOR ME”.. if you’re one of those who needs office social interaction, you should say that it works for you, but dont expect the rest of us to fall in line.. same with people like myself who have WFH for years since well before the Virus.. i make good money, but you could literally offer to double my salary and it wouldnt be enough money for me to sit in traffic and deal with gossipy coworkers and water cooler BS.. but again, that’s what works FOR ME… let’s stop assuming we’re all the same .
Posted on 5/29/24 at 10:04 am to baldona
quote:
But a large percentage of people suck without on site management. They just do, it’s never going to change. Not everyone can be the top 25% of employees.
They also suck with on site management, they just present differently.
If I'm in an office I will be less effective. Why?
I can't sit weird.
I can't make weird noises.
I have to make sure I say hi to everyone when I get up.
I have to work within the confines of an 8 hour day. I work better in short spurts.
I have to talk to people when I have lunch. I know some of you don't understand this, but I simply don't want to talk to people. I have to participate in enough meetings throughout the day, I can't be on for 8 hours.
I can't pet my dog.
I don't have all my food options.
I can't go for a run and sit down sweaty and get back into it on my terms.
Sound pissy? Sure. But these are my terms for working. I don't care if you have all you can eat mini kit kats and shitty coffee and a puzzle table. If you don't like it, fire me. I'm 100% okay with that. But bringing up that you accept being fired gives you leverage, which a lot of people don't like.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 10:05 am
Posted on 5/29/24 at 10:53 am to Odysseus32
quote:
They also suck with on site management, they just present differently. If I'm in an office I will be less effective. Why? I can't sit weird. I can't make weird noises. I have to make sure I say hi to everyone when I get up. I have to work within the confines of an 8 hour day. I work better in short spurts.
Sure, but most jobs aren’t like this…
It’s amazing how the WFH people think that everyone can work from home.
Here’s my issue as a small business owner. I have to have phone hours, when I open and close. So people know. That’s great Joe blow works from 5:30 to 2, but guess what I can’t have that.
I also have operations staff that do the work on job sites. Then I have office staff. The operations staff get pissy as they can’t WFH. The shitty office staff without a college degree are unreliable at home. Miss phone calls, slow to email, etc. it’s also hard to have an office phone ring at multiple locations. Sure, fire them because they suck? Rinse and repeat. Not every employee is an all star. Someone takes a shite at 10:30am at home and doesn’t answer it do I answer in my office? Or are they washing their hands and getting it next ring? Not everything is handled by technology.
You guys assume most jobs are Fortune 500 college degree office jobs. They aren’t. Even the degrees engineers, accountants, etc. likely work with a lot of operations and office staff that are extremely unreliable without direct supervision.
Once you allow one person to WFH it’s bad moral for others to not be able to, that can’t.
My point is, if you can do it and get paid and be happy than that’s fantastic. But pull your head out of your arse and realize that a huge portion of businesses can’t.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 10:55 am
Posted on 5/29/24 at 10:54 am to baldona
Some corporate paper pusher is going to say you don’t know how to run your company
Posted on 5/29/24 at 10:58 am to baldona
quote:
Here’s my issue as a small business owner.
could we ask what you do, that requires this level of on site commitment ?
and if some of your employees MUST work in the warehouse, and your office people can't cut it at home, that is a you problem
quote:
Some corporate paper pusher is going to say you don’t know how to run your company
I sit at a desk a good part of my day, and i could literally be sitting anywhere in the world...I get that a doctor has to work in a building designed for him, but his receptionist doesnt have to..
Someone that builds firetrucks, has to be on site to weld, but that whole front office can work from home..
the arguments are there for too many jobs to be remote, to even consider that its a temporary thing
I find that most people arguing against it, have realized that if they work from home, their oversight on site will not be missed, and what will they have then
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 11:02 am
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:03 am to baldona
quote:
It’s amazing how the WFH people think that everyone can work from home.
Show me a single post that said that everyone can work from home. There are even posts that point out how working from home isn't something that can be done for all jobs. You're doing exactly what the poster above said. You're applying your specific scenario and using it as some sort of "blow" against working from home. We are aware that not everyone can work from home. We are also aware that there are plenty of people who could perform their job 100% remotely, but are forced to work out of an office. And before you say it, yes it's the company's prerogative to make their employees work from an office.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:09 am to GrammarKnotsi
quote:
I find that most people arguing against it, have realized that if they work from home, their oversight on site will not be missed, and what will they have then
But it's not like management disappears just because you work remotely, we still have managers and my company is 100% remote.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:09 am to burger bearcat
frick, America is soft as shite.
Muh 8-5 and 30 minute commute is so tough
I get up at 3am to lift 3:30-5:30 on work days, followed by lacing up the work boots for a 12 hour shift.
Muh 8-5 and 30 minute commute is so tough

I get up at 3am to lift 3:30-5:30 on work days, followed by lacing up the work boots for a 12 hour shift.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:18 am to GrammarKnotsi
What kind of business do you own and how many employees do you have?
Posted on 5/29/24 at 11:38 am to WaydownSouth
Sounds like a shitty day
Popular
Back to top
