- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/25/23 at 9:05 pm to AdamOCallaghan
I call bullshite. I changed only the height to 5.8 feet and it said 36%. No way average height reduced it by over 50%.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 2:25 am to AdamOCallaghan
I scored a .7% but it wouldn’t let me choose above 18 as minimum age. That’s a MAJOR problem. (I’m married, so I’m not looking but I answered as if I wasn’t. curious what this calculator does.) I still don’t understand it.
And again not being able to raise the minimum age above 18 is a big issue
I put 45K for income so i don’t understand why it’s delusional??
49 as max age. Maybe not obese makes it delusional??
My height “requirement” could be delusional
Am i delusional??
By not married do they mean has never been married
And again not being able to raise the minimum age above 18 is a big issue
I put 45K for income so i don’t understand why it’s delusional??
49 as max age. Maybe not obese makes it delusional??
My height “requirement” could be delusional
Am i delusional??
By not married do they mean has never been married
This post was edited on 8/26/23 at 2:46 am
Posted on 8/26/23 at 5:51 am to AdamOCallaghan
I got 0.0%.
Does this mean I don’t exist?
Does this mean I don’t exist?
Posted on 8/26/23 at 6:06 am to Grinder
quote:
Does this mean I don’t exist?
It just means you are gay. Embrace it.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 6:07 am to Grinder
These calculators appear to be shite. In the “keeper” one posted later in the thread, the calculator is using the entire US population, which makes the probability much lower than necessary.
Of course a very small percentage of the overall US population fits that criteria. The real probability would go up significantly if you could limit it to a more isolated parameter that matches what someone in the dating pool would be looking for. A heterosexual male looking for a female in the 23-35 age range will have a much higher probability of finding someone 5’1-5’8, not married or obese, making $30k+/year. Their dating pool doesn’t include the elderly, men, or children.
quote:
What percent of the US population is female, white, 23-35 years old, 5’1”-5’8” tall, making at least $30,000 and isn't married or obese?
1%
Of course a very small percentage of the overall US population fits that criteria. The real probability would go up significantly if you could limit it to a more isolated parameter that matches what someone in the dating pool would be looking for. A heterosexual male looking for a female in the 23-35 age range will have a much higher probability of finding someone 5’1-5’8, not married or obese, making $30k+/year. Their dating pool doesn’t include the elderly, men, or children.
This post was edited on 8/26/23 at 6:32 am
Posted on 8/26/23 at 6:15 am to AdamOCallaghan
Friend,
6’4”
39
Income less than $5000
Not married
Not obese
No place to add that I live with Mother.
0.1 percentile. Am I really that good of a catch?
Yours,
TulaneLSU
6’4”
39
Income less than $5000
Not married
Not obese
No place to add that I live with Mother.
0.1 percentile. Am I really that good of a catch?
Yours,
TulaneLSU
This post was edited on 8/26/23 at 6:16 am
Posted on 8/26/23 at 6:31 am to X123F45
quote:
I decided to see where I'd be... .2%
I clocked in at .4% and I ain't all that special!
Posted on 8/26/23 at 6:34 am to StringedInstruments
quote:Its a game dude its not exact science but it does show a large population of men in this country are som fat arse losers.
These calculators appear to be shite. In the “keeper” one posted later in the thread, the calculator is using the entire US population, which makes the probability much lower than necessary.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 7:01 am to AdamOCallaghan
.6% lol
Posted on 8/26/23 at 7:46 am to AdamOCallaghan
“Colour”? Pass
These colors don’t run.
These colors don’t run.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 11:01 am to ninthward
quote:
clocked in at .4% and I ain't all that special!
I mean... I'm basically just white trash who enjoys the finer things and I'm still .2
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:41 pm to AdamOCallaghan
We need to make it mandatory for women to take an economics/personal finance class in high school and college. My cousin said the average income for a man was $200k and she was dead serious. I guess that's why you see so many women not going into STEM careers.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:54 pm to AdamOCallaghan
So that was interesting. I’m 0.1%. Like a walking unicorn.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:58 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
If you are white, reasonably attractive, intelligent, single, make over 200 k a year- you are rare indeed. But ugly fat women will scoff at you because they are holding out for that guy on IG with a helicopter pad on his yacht, lol. There are millions of those guys just waiting for these common girls.Delusional is correct.
No different from incels. They're usually nondescript dudes who think they're entitled to bang multiple OT 9s.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News