- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Depp/Heard Trial is the gift that keeps on giving
Posted on 5/24/22 at 4:03 pm to JDPndahizzy
Posted on 5/24/22 at 4:03 pm to JDPndahizzy
quote:
this is Howell nuking Whitney Heard's version of the staircase incident
Did not see it. Wow.
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Link?
1
Posted on 5/24/22 at 4:19 pm to molsusports
I know you all love you some Rekieta Law.
But I am listening to him discuss the proffer of evidence. He and whoever the grey haired guy is barely understand this part of the trial. And I am being generous.
But I am listening to him discuss the proffer of evidence. He and whoever the grey haired guy is barely understand this part of the trial. And I am being generous.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 5:14 pm to JudgeHolden
I’m not sure what kind of lawyers those guys are, but one thing I’ve learned is that there are so many aspects to law and different kinds of lawyers. I have a friend who’s a lawyer and I asked him about some things with this case and he was like “I have no idea” 
. It was like asking a PCP about brain surgery
. It was like asking a PCP about brain surgery Posted on 5/24/22 at 5:35 pm to abellsujr
I had a few things I had to accomplish while the young lady was supposed to destroy the sister's staircase testimony. I was unable to hear it. Did she stomp? 
Posted on 5/24/22 at 5:41 pm to abellsujr
quote:
I’m not sure what kind of lawyers those guys are, but one thing I’ve learned is that there are so many aspects to law and different kinds of lawyers. I have a friend who’s a lawyer and I asked him about some things with this case and he was like “I have no idea”
Judge's post came as Nick was looking up the Virginia statute on proffering for civil cases
all he was finding was stuff for criminal cases
Posted on 5/24/22 at 5:53 pm to JudgeHolden
So I went to watch on Rekeita and the videos say you have to get approval and comments turned off. Did it get the ole banhammer?
Posted on 5/24/22 at 6:00 pm to Pierre
quote:
So I went to watch on Rekeita and the videos say you have to get approval and comments turned off. Did it get the ole banhammer?
his videos are up on YouTube are anyone can watch
you have to subscribe to his channel to be able to chat... but you can watch live
Posted on 5/24/22 at 6:07 pm to rt3
Posted on 5/24/22 at 6:07 pm to Geekboy
I’m sure this has been answered before but why do they record all of their conversations? Or did they start whenever things started going south? It just seems odd that they have so many recordings of themselves.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 6:10 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
I’m sure this has been answered before but why do they record all of their conversations? Or did they start whenever things started going south? It just seems odd that they have so many recordings of themselves.
it sounds like they would record their arguments and bring the recordings to their therapist to MMQB their situations
that said... other recordings seem to have more nefarious reasons
This post was edited on 5/24/22 at 6:11 pm
Posted on 5/24/22 at 6:45 pm to rt3
quote:
Judge's post came as Nick was looking up the Virginia statute on proffering for civil cases
The grey haired guy was saying this was repetitive, and that the “objections” were a back door effort to sway the judge on jury charges.
That’s just dumb.
If you offer evidence that the judge refuses to admit, you have to “proffer” the evidence so the appellate court can know what it was. The proffer almost always happens near the end of civil trials. That’s what they were doing.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 7:03 pm to JudgeHolden
Posted on 5/24/22 at 7:17 pm to rt3
Jennifer Howell's statement has been entered into evidence and will be available to the jury during deliberations - read her declaration
This post was edited on 5/24/22 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 5/24/22 at 7:21 pm to rt3
How in the frick is that not hearsay.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 7:22 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
How in the frick is that not hearsay.
prior conflicting statements?
Posted on 5/24/22 at 7:24 pm to rt3
Not to her.
And generally you can’t get in prior consistent statements.
And generally you can’t get in prior consistent statements.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 7:40 pm to Corso
I read Kate Moss will be on tomorrow via video chat
Posted on 5/24/22 at 8:04 pm to Geekboy
Ole hunter thompson couldn’t write this stuff….
Posted on 5/25/22 at 5:14 am to GeauxtigersMs36
Fear and Loathing in Fairfax
Posted on 5/25/22 at 6:36 am to GeauxtigersMs36
quote:
Ole hunter thompson couldn’t write this stuff….
Although his RS story covering the Roxanne Pulitzer trial came pretty close.
"THERE IS A LOT OF WRECKAGE in the fast lane these days. Not even the rich feel safe from it, and people are looking for reasons..."
HST Rolling Stone article
Page 84 of 143
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News