re: Tangipahoa Parish rape victim ordered to pay her abuser child support

Congratulations on being the 300th LSU poster to make the same clever comment whenever you see something you disagree with.

The Judge needs to be held accountable for this. There’s absolutely ZERO excuse as to why the piece of shite rapist shouldn’t be charged with carnal knowledge of a Juvenile. I don’t give a shite about some bullshite “good ole boys” network. This is a case of what is right, and what is wrong. No Judge is above the law.

quote:

---

“The Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff’s Office has reviewed and identified the breakdown in operations relating to the initial complaint filed by the complainant.

---

So the bug-eyed weasel has figured out why it was ignored.

quote:

---

The Judge needs to be held accountable for this. There’s absolutely ZERO excuse as to why the piece of shite rapist shouldn’t be charged with carnal knowledge of a Juvenile.

---

Charges of carnal knowledge of a juvenile were not presented to the judge. I’m not sure the degree to which a judge can sua sponte convict someone without an arrest, trial and prosecution.

Well lets look at Havoc's post history following the one token mention it was statutory rape:

quote:

---

Well, I’m sure there are a number of possible factors that if present would make it seem much less so. Meeting a girl in a bar IMO is a pretty reasonable basis to believe she’s at least 17-18, if not older, although again not a legal defense. Maybe she was with older friends as well.

---

quote:

---

You don’t know how old she looked.

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

if they ruled she was too intoxicated to know what was going on and he raped her,

---

You:
So like a pre-rape breathalyzer or field sobriety test?

---

quote:

---

Okay, what if she looks 19? 20?

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

a DNA test confirmed the timeline of the rape

---

You questioning how DNA tests work
How did it do that?

---

quote:

---

Haven’t seen this mentioned but really sounds fishy:
quote:

quote:

---

Abelseth said she waited to file the police report because she did not know the law. "I thought if I didn't do it the next day, there was nothing I could do about it," Abelseth said.

---

Really??

---

quote:

---

I’m talking about her saying she thought rape had to be reported the next day. Nobody thinks that.

---

quote:

---

I’m curious as to your personal involvement in this matter.

---

quote:

---

Dude you are so horrible and unhinged you’ve actually done more damage to the victims case here in this discussion with your idiotic repeated false assumptions and unnecessary vitriol.
frick.
But please keep posting the same shite over and over and over and over again.

---

quote:

---

The 2015 rape report did not mention anything about underage. The police probably concluded that it was a 10 year old rape allegation filed by a woman in the midst of a bitter legal dispute with the accused and ignored it.

---

So to summary, all you have done all thread is basically:

1.) Infer the blame on the woman and make excuses for John Barnes

2.) Throw doubt at the woman's claims, make more excuses for John Barnes.

3.) After finally pausing excuses for John Barnes, pivot to making up excuses for the police mishandeling of her allegation while subtly still questioning her allegation.

4.) Attack me for calling John Barnes the predator POS he is and clutch pearls about how that is pushing you to side with John Barnes


In all those posts:

No condemnation of Barnes, no skepticism toward his claims, the police claims, the judge's behavior, the conflicts of interest between Barnes and the police, the daughters own rape allegation and subsequent medical reports confirming forced entry and the rape kit police refuse to cooperate with the family about, the additional allegations of domestic abuse by an unrelated partner to John Barnes....no comment there, just skepticism of the woman and rationalizations for the police

First of all, this sounds like a statutory rape situation. I'm not saying the victim (in any hypothetical rape situation) has to go straight from the scene to the police station (regardless of what sort of rape it is), but that internal mental clock in all of us is ticking and it sure is in mine.

IF you wait a year, 2 years, 10 years, sure the statute of limitations hasn't run yet, but I'm afraid I'm skeptical and going to need a little more than your word.

So, with all that "right wing" bullshite out of the way, the dude would be in a pickle with me. I don't need a lot more evidence to gig him pretty hard (whether I was the civil or criminal judge) - DNA test and 3 birth certificates ought to do it.

He better be able to prove he's a time traveler and he was too young for it to be statutory rape in 2005. I don't know what else could exonerate him.

quote:

---

Says the guy spending two days conjuring up excuses for poor policing and a predator rapist, then personally attacking anyone challenging his bullshite.

---

I’ve made about 7-8 posts here.

YOU’VE been here non stop almost 24/7 repeating the same shite over and over again, you fricking idiot psycho.

See, there’s that utter lack of self awareness again.

quote:

---

I’ve made about 7-8 posts here.

YOU’VE been here non stop almost 24/7 repeating the same shite over and over again, you fricking idiot psycho.

See, there’s that utter lack of self awareness again.

---

This seems to be the new go-to for some of you John Barnes apologists.

You started off slut shaming, making every excuse you could to defend John's honor, aggressively going after anyone questioning your John Barnes excuses, and now that the additional facts have come out and eviscerated that nonsense, you are leaving unacknowledged all the new facts, doubling down on defending the police, and pivoting to going after the people that questioned that gut reactionary defending of Barnes/police/judge.

quote:

---

You started off slut shaming,

---

Please cite this. Of course you posted all my posts above so please point out which one was slut shaming. Hint: you can’t.

quote:

---

making every excuse you could to defend John's honor

---

bullshite, there were a few issues I addressed logically regarding the facts and circumstance.
You truly are one stupid motherfricker.

quote:

---

aggressively going after anyone questioning your John Barnes excuses,

---

Again, WTF are you talking about? You’re the only one I’ve attacked because you’re an idiotic psychopath posting here literally 24/7 like some rabid dog.