- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tangipahoa Parish rape victim ordered to pay her abuser child support
Posted on 6/16/22 at 10:43 pm to Bronc
Posted on 6/16/22 at 10:43 pm to Bronc
quote:
As she said in her Daily Mail interview, she struggled with shame and the expectation of people blaming her, her blaming herself, and that the boyfriend wanted to be the father. Felt she should just bury it and try and move on.
Weird, that contradicts what she said in the prior interview:
quote:
Abelseth said she waited to file the police report because she did not know the law. "I thought if I didn't do it the next day, there was nothing I could do about it," Abelseth said.
So…which is it?
Posted on 6/16/22 at 10:50 pm to Havoc
quote:
bullshite, there were a few issues I addressed logically regarding the facts and circumstance.
You truly are one stupid motherfricker.
Of course, logic Logic that all flowed the same way: questioning the woman, defending the rapist, knighting for the cops/judge, attacking those that challenged those assumptions.
And guess what? Nothing's changed. Still fricking doing it huh?
I mean why is it so hard for you to just say, you know what, I was wrong? Instead you show up after all these developments with a ridiculous defense of the police and to attack those that called out your terrible "logic"
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 10:50 pm
Posted on 6/16/22 at 10:53 pm to Havoc
quote:
Weird, that contradicts what she said in the prior interview:
There is no contradiction you rapist apologist POS. You truly can't help attacking her and knighting for John can you???
She is explaining WHY she didn't immediately go to the police, what her mental process post incident was. She said in her interview she assumed after not going immediately she couldn't.
Any words on the daughter??? The additional domestic abuse alegation against John from another woman???
You seem to have avoided those allegations entirely Mr. Apologist....wonder why?
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 10:56 pm
Posted on 6/16/22 at 10:57 pm to SPEEDY
If this is true, its awful. Am i going to hell for thinking there's got to be more to the story?
Posted on 6/16/22 at 10:58 pm to Bronc
quote:
questioning the woman
Asking questions about a very bizarre set of circumstances? In your damaged brain is this not allowed? That’s not slut shaming you fricking idiot.
quote:
defending the rapist
I was replying logically re: hypotheticals about facts that would make the actions seem less heinous. Are you really this stupid?
quote:
knighting for the cops/judge
Yes you really are this stupid.
On one hand your reading comprehension is 4th grade level. On the other, even plain easy to understand statements that you don’t like you just ignore. THEN on top of that you are a lying POS and freely just make up accusations out of thin air.
I said prove it, cite my posts and you cited NOTHING because you’re a lying POS.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:01 pm to Feelthebarn
quote:
If this is true, its awful. Am i going to hell for thinking there's got to be more to the story?
Yes, it gets worse.
Daughter claiming rape/ongoing abuse from the accused with a positive rape kit showing forced entry on the date alleged where she was with the father, rapist with contracts with the local police department, a judge with a reputation for a corrupt court, additional domestic abuse allegations from another woman toward the accused, lots of BAWS that are bending over backwards to defend the accused's honor and the police incompetence/corruption.
Including a "new" poster here that aggressively went on the defense for the accused, claimed he knew the daughter, made some slanderous claims about the woman, attacked people that disagreed, then when the new info dropped that evicerated that, he scrubbed all his posts and ghosted the thread.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 11:08 pm
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:01 pm to Havoc
Well this thread is over for now. Y'all done with your dick measuring contest?
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:04 pm to Havoc
quote:
Asking questions about a very bizarre set of circumstances? In your damaged brain is this not allowed? That’s not slut shaming you fricking idiot.
Questions all going one way: doubting the woman, questioning how she might have been dressed /acted, making excuses for the cops//judge/rapist, and no questions or concerns regarding the latest allegations or toward the accused....just more cop excuses and attacking those that questioned you.
In fact I just gave you the opportunity to comment or "question" the new developments about the father's multiple allegations from the daughter/ex lover, but it seems your curiosity has run dry....interesting.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:08 pm to Bronc
quote:
Bronc
You sound like my ex wife. Go to sleep
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:09 pm to Bronc
quote:
rapist apologist POS
Oh you mean doesn’t blindly accept whatever the woman says. Sure.
Honestly I don’t give a rats arse about either of them and they both seem trashy AF. He’s certainly seems to meet the definition of rapist per the carnal knowledge of a juvenile statute.
And it’s obviously a contradiction to anyone with a functioning brain which you do not have. She literally said she thought rapes had to be reported the next day and she missed her opportunity, and she didn’t learn until years later that she could still report it. Then she says she waited because of fear of shaming, etc. That’s a direct contradiction.
quote:
Any words on the daughter???
Nothing to say without more facts. Either the judge had a basis for ignoring the medical evidence or he didn’t. I have no way of knowing that.
quote:
The additional domestic abuse alegation against John from another woman???
Because women never lie about domestic abuse during a divorce, right? But again, no details whatsoever so how could I have any words on it???
Let me reiterate: you are a fundamentally stupid, mentally unstable and deceitful POS.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:09 pm to lildaddy86
Another early John Barnes apologist enters the ring to lash out....
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:14 pm to Bronc
quote:
This thread is a perfect example of why many woman hesitate to go to the police.
All I said was that I was skeptical. I'm heavily on her side on the civil action and cannot contemplate his not being guilty of statutory rape. And, not a 19-year old and 16-year old and 350 day type statutory rape. A particularly egregious one.
And, maybe there is evidence of a more serious charge. I'm sorry, after 10 years, I have to have more than her word.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:15 pm to Havoc
quote:
Oh you mean doesn’t blindly accept whatever the woman says. Sure.
And yet, not a single post until it was twisted out of you questioning or condemning the man(and you STILL have to try and claim equal blame for both sides), but no words of skepticism for the judge, the police's claims on this matter, or any of the rapist's claims... just the woman, just the daughter, just the ex, just the victim.
There's a clear pattern, and no matter how many times you lash out, every post only confirms what I have stated about your apologism and one-way "questioning" of this case.
quote:
Let me reiterate: you are a fundamentally stupid, mentally unstable and deceitful POS.
Coming from a melty, victim-blaming, rapist apologist, this is the highest of compliments
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:17 pm to Bronc
There’s no point to this:
1. You’re too stupid to comprehend what is stated.
2. You’re intellectually dishonest (aka a fricking lying POS) and deliberately misstate things as you want them to be.
3. You’re mentally unhinged and just ignore logical statements and facts that you don’t like.
1. You’re too stupid to comprehend what is stated.
2. You’re intellectually dishonest (aka a fricking lying POS) and deliberately misstate things as you want them to be.
3. You’re mentally unhinged and just ignore logical statements and facts that you don’t like.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:24 pm to Havoc
quote:
Havoc
Are you a Lawyer? Yes or No?
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:25 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
And, maybe there is evidence of a more serious charge. I'm sorry, after 10 years, I have to have more than her word.
And thats why this case gets us where we are.
Because we SHOULD have answers, but we don't. And we don't because the police buried the report for 7 years and never even assigned a detective, the judge dismissed positive medical results from the daughters own rape allegations against the father just this month, without stating a reason. A father with additional pending allegations of domestic abuse from another woman, a father that just so happens to have a contract with the local police.
But the guilt on the statutory rape is not in question. The age of the daughter, the father himself, and a DNA test prove he impregnated her at age 30 when she was 16. And we know he knew her age at this point because it wasn't just a random hook up, he went to the bar with his friend, and the mother was with the sister of the accused's friend. Juniors in High School. And they all were drinking heavily.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 11:30 pm
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:27 pm to Havoc
quote:
There’s no point to this:
1. You’re too stupid to comprehend what is stated.
2. You’re intellectually dishonest (aka a fricking lying POS) and deliberately misstate things as you want them to be.
3. You’re mentally unhinged and just ignore logical statements and facts that you don’t like.
I am amused how many of the John Barnes apologists throughout this thread have consistently projected onto everyone around you the very things you are actually doing
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:45 pm to Bronc
None of it looks good for the authorities. It takes a lot to outrage me and I'm outraged by the civil results, alone.
The only thing I could ask of law enforcement is, "Are you corrupt in this case because of connections to this guy or are you just grossly incompetent?" Difficult to imagine a third option.
The only thing I could ask of law enforcement is, "Are you corrupt in this case because of connections to this guy or are you just grossly incompetent?" Difficult to imagine a third option.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:48 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
The only thing I could ask of law enforcement is, "Are you corrupt in this case because of connections to this guy or are you just grossly incompetent?" Difficult to imagine a third option.
I suspect it's probably a strong combination of both.
And the depressing thing is systemic bureaucratic corruption and incompetence is nearly impossible to combat and counteract.
Posted on 6/17/22 at 12:12 am to Havoc
quote:
rapist apologist POS
Oh you mean doesn’t blindly accept whatever the woman says. Sure.
Are you suggesting that the woman is lying about her age, his age or her daughters age?
Popular
Back to top



2






