Started By
Message

re: SWAT Sniper shoots suspect through computer monitor while he has 2 hostages

Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:25 am to
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
25975 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:25 am to
Shame to waste a perfectly good monitor, but sacrifices must be made
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
10227 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:28 am to
I love a happy ending!
Posted by WhiskeyThrottle
Weatherford Tx
Member since Nov 2017
6438 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:28 am to
I have a .30 cal silencer and decided to buy some .308 subsonic rounds for fun. They're incredibly silent. As quiet as a .22 subsonic canned. But insanely inaccurate and slow. The drop at 50 yards was quite incredible. That's my experience with .30 cal silenced, so for those reasons, I'd guess the round absolutely was supersonic. And you could hear a crack in the video. But, my experience is limited so I could be wrong.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
55408 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:36 am to
:manshootingtv.gif:
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
27661 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:38 am to
Always a chance of the object you are shooting through altering the trajectory of the bullet.
Posted by WhiskeyThrottle
Weatherford Tx
Member since Nov 2017
6438 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:39 am to
quote:

omg i just saw a man die


That wasn't a man.
Posted by Jon A thon
Member since May 2019
2131 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:39 am to
I'm more surprised to take that tight of a shot standing off of another guys shoulder than anything else. You have to steady yourself and also trust the other guy is not going to flinch at the wrong time. I imagine they practice that though.
Posted by WhiskeyThrottle
Weatherford Tx
Member since Nov 2017
6438 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:41 am to
I'm not really a ballistics expert, but that shot doesn't seem prone to deflection given the variables there. It would seem two people in the video should be thankful they took the shot. If I were one of the hostages, I'd be alright with the risk of the swat taking the shot, vs the risk of not taking the shot.
Posted by Potchafa
Avoyelles
Member since Jul 2016
3820 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:42 am to
I had to make a few critical decisions in the early 2000's with approval. I would have taken that shot all day! Pretty sure he told he used for a prop, if you move the hostage dies!
Posted by WhiskeyThrottle
Weatherford Tx
Member since Nov 2017
6438 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:42 am to
quote:

I'm more surprised to take that tight of a shot standing off of another guys shoulder than anything else. You have to steady yourself and also trust the other guy is not going to flinch at the wrong time. I imagine they practice that though.


Yeah, I've never seen that, but I've also not seen a lot of SWAT training or executing a shot like that. Shoulder rest guy didn't seem to have any allergies or nervous ticks in the situation. So I guess that's good.
Posted by Finch
Member since Jun 2015
3505 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:55 am to
quote:

Have you guys done a lot of testing shooting rifles through computer monitors or something?


No but clearly the SWAT has done similar testing you dumbfrick

They explain it in the linked article. Spend less time arguing and more time learning and you might accidentally become knowledgeable in something
Posted by btrcj
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2019
681 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:56 am to
quote:

Surely there's a better way to kill the guy without shooting through a monitor lol. There's no guarantee where that bullet goes after going through a computer.


Hmmm... Just maybe the snipers know a little more about external ballistics of a 308 then YOU?????
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
69171 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 7:57 am to
quote:



No but clearly the SWAT has done similar testing you dumbfrick

They explain it in the linked article. Spend less time arguing and more time learning and you might accidentally become knowledgeable in something


Also it's a high powered rifle about 20 feet from an object made from plastics and soft metals. It would be different if the shot was from 100+ feet and going through a metal door.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
20872 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 8:02 am to
I know retired seal that before he moved would train the Vermillion Parish swat team. One of the classes he taught was shooting through glass. He basically said it doesn’t really change anything.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
132588 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 8:05 am to
quote:

It’s basically shooting through glass with a .308


At close range.

A computer monitor is not going to change the the trajectory a .308 round that close.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
17749 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 8:06 am to
quote:

Have you guys done a lot of testing shooting rifles through computer monitors or something?


Seen bullets punch through solid steel with almost zero deviation. Something known as "barrier blindness" and it's known which cartridges and bullets are more blind than others. A slippery monolithic copper projectile from any full-power cartridge is going to punch through a flat monitor without caring that it was there. Probably did much the same to the guy's skull too.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
132588 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Seen bullets punch through solid steel with almost zero deviation. Something known as "barrier blindness" and it's known which cartridges and bullets are more blind than others. A slippery monolithic copper projectile from any full-power cartridge is going to punch through a flat monitor without caring that it was there. Probably did much the same to the guy's skull too.


The sniper was probably more worried what was behind the robber's skull than what was in front of it.
Posted by Boudreauboudreaugoly
Land of the Rice n Son
Member since Oct 2017
2172 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 8:35 am to
Tell me you don’t know shite about firearms/ballistics without telling me you don’t know shite about firearms/ballistics.
Posted by Hook Em Horns
350000 posts
Member since Sep 2010
15649 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 9:12 am to
So nobody is gonna talk about the alter getting absolutely dunked on by rummel and them????
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
78739 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 9:15 am to
quote:

Well, it's not retarded. Bullets change trajectory after they hit shite. It's called physics. Also you're a nerd.


This is how weve got to banning assault weapons without a single person being able to define an assault weapon.

first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram