- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Court gives victory to baker who refused to make cake for gay wedding
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:29 am to Will Cover
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:29 am to Will Cover
Good. Private business and all.
2
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:30 am to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
They're still assholes for refusing. No law against being an a-hole though
Why? I don't see anything wrong with it. They are against gay marriage due to religious beliefs.
I wouldn't bake a planned parenthood cake.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:34 am to Fun Bunch
quote:My point is that the headlines have almost nothing to do with the actual decision. And people are simply reacting to the headline.
Having now read the decision, I think its more of a win than people are making it out to be. It definitely paints States into a corner.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:36 am to fallguy_1978
who were the two moron dissenters?
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:37 am to AlceeFortier
Ginsburg and Sotomayor, the two usual suspects.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:37 am to fallguy_1978
quote:I would.
I wouldn't bake a planned parenthood cake
Morals are for poor people.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:38 am to ell_13
quote:
My point is that the headlines have almost nothing to do with the actual decision. And people are simply reacting to the headline.
that's what happens when the story writers use horrible headlines
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:39 am to Will Cover
quote:
But the opinion was a very narrow one
quote:
In a 7-2 decision,
Wut...?
Even in the Headlines...
quote:
In narrow ruling, Supreme Court gives victory to baker who refused to make cake for gay wedding
Never mind...
This post was edited on 6/4/18 at 10:46 am
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:39 am to Will Cover
Really?!? the whole thing was a set-up by the gays anyway. You mean a gay couple decided to plan a wedding and then went:
"Hey Todd, you know who's the perfect cake maker for us? That super-fundy bible-beater cake guy over there that wont even make a Halloween cake!"
"You're right Sebastian! I cant imagine that going wrong in any way!"
frickin please
"Hey Todd, you know who's the perfect cake maker for us? That super-fundy bible-beater cake guy over there that wont even make a Halloween cake!"
"You're right Sebastian! I cant imagine that going wrong in any way!"
frickin please
This post was edited on 6/4/18 at 10:42 am
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:40 am to GEAUXT
quote:
it's shocking that it took the supreme court to actually let common sense prevail
These cases are filed exclusively to challenge a law in the books. Like forcing the hand of Congress.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:40 am to Fun Bunch
So you are telling me I can't get a Halloween cake from them.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:40 am to Hangover Haven
I’ll help you out.
quote:
But the opinion was a very narrow one
quote:
In a 7-2 decision,
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:40 am to Hangover Haven
quote:
Wut...?
Narrow in terms of how it can be applied to other cases. I am not an attorney, but I thought usually that was only found out after it was brought up in court as a defense.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:42 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I think its more of a win than people are making it out to be. It definitely paints States into a corner.
Making the federal government even more powerful than States is not a win.
This post was edited on 6/4/18 at 11:02 am
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:42 am to Lsuhack1
Gotcha...
Thanks..
Thanks..
This post was edited on 6/4/18 at 10:44 am
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:43 am to Will Cover
Personally I believe you should be able to serve whoever the frick you want. It's your own business. I don't know the details but does it say he refused to serve them because they were together and assumed they were gay or because the cake had some gay expression on it?
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:46 am to TH03
Private businesses should be able to not do business with who they want....says a lot of the same people who advocate for privatization of gov’t services? Private firefighting units or ambulances, can they refuse to service people who’s beliefs they don’t agree with? What about doctors? Grocery store owners? Restaurants?
If only there was a time in our recent history where certain minority groups were refused access to private businesses based on the beliefs of the private business owners, and we could see if that system worked.
If only there was a time in our recent history where certain minority groups were refused access to private businesses based on the beliefs of the private business owners, and we could see if that system worked.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:46 am to Will Cover
quote:
He runs his business guided by religious principles, closing on Sunday and refusing to make cakes containing alcohol or celebrating Halloween
Most bakeries are closed on Sunday anyway.
He better not use vanilla or he is a hypocrite, lol.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:46 am to Fun Bunch
quote:She will be a torn in Americas side for the next 2 decades.
Sotomayor,
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News