- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supporters, critics still awaiting St. George signature results
Posted on 11/28/18 at 3:43 pm to BlackAdam
Posted on 11/28/18 at 3:43 pm to BlackAdam
quote:
believe it because I signed on two separate occasions, and do not live within the zone. Maybe she is talking about me.
Why the frick you lyyyyyinnnnn why you always lyyyyyinnnnn
Mmmmmnnnn ohhh my gawwwdddddd
Stop your frickin lyyyyin
Posted on 11/28/18 at 3:44 pm to Upperdecker
I'll never forget the PBS Frontline Hit Piece they ran...
Pulled out emotional sob stories of kids and education, PhDs from west coast universities, etc. to support "together".
For St. George they basically had an 80yr old man in-front of his garage holding a St. George sign.
Not in one second of the entire episode did they mention, interview or consult an expert on other incorporated areas in the US that have done this successfully. I mean, there are LITERALLY people who have done this before...not one mention of it or how it went.
It was such one sided BS, I had no opinion on St. George before but that entire episode of one sided emotional ploy BS made me want them to succeed.
Pulled out emotional sob stories of kids and education, PhDs from west coast universities, etc. to support "together".
For St. George they basically had an 80yr old man in-front of his garage holding a St. George sign.
Not in one second of the entire episode did they mention, interview or consult an expert on other incorporated areas in the US that have done this successfully. I mean, there are LITERALLY people who have done this before...not one mention of it or how it went.
It was such one sided BS, I had no opinion on St. George before but that entire episode of one sided emotional ploy BS made me want them to succeed.
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 11/28/18 at 3:59 pm to BlackAdam
quote:This frickin guy
I believe it because I signed on two separate occasions, and do not live within the zone. Maybe she is talking about me.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:22 pm to MisslePig
quote:
Not in one second of the entire episode did they mention, interview or consult an expert on other incorporated areas in the US that have done this successfully.
You'd think all the cities we have in the US now were incorporated when the Pilgrim's landed and that the SG movement was some kind of revolution.
New cities pop up all the time.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:30 pm to doubleb
It is because BR afford to lose the tax base of this area.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:33 pm to tommy2tone1999
I think she is confusing her "vetting" with their huge withdrawal effort results.
From the St. George FB Page:
From the St. George FB Page:
quote:
After further review: Of the 23 removals submitted 6 signed then removed, 2 are not in St. George, and 15 never signed the petition. They also turned in 6 more today. Because, as you suspect, they don’t believe laws and rules apply to them.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:49 pm to tommy2tone1999
They'll still have to fight it in court.
BR can't afford to lose the budget because they refuse to consider cutting spending.
BR can't afford to lose the budget because they refuse to consider cutting spending.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:52 pm to Mahootney
quote:
They'll still have to fight it in court.
God I hope so
Posted on 11/28/18 at 4:55 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
It sure beats 100% for like 200 years
That's one old slave.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 5:04 pm to johnnyrocket
quote:
It is because BR afford to lose the tax base of this area.
Exactly
Posted on 11/28/18 at 6:25 pm to doubleb
Just like the road tax the mayor wants will have a construction mgmt firm in charge of making sure the projects go forward.
The MoveBR commercials do not mention this.
I wonder why?
The MoveBR commercials do not mention this.
I wonder why?
Posted on 11/28/18 at 7:26 pm to johnnyrocket
This is the same mayor who is warning SGeans about paying higher taxes.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 8:34 pm to doubleb
The same mayor who also opposes the NAACPs efforts the deconsolidate the City/Parish Government.
Posted on 11/28/18 at 8:39 pm to johnnyrocket
Broome said the management firm would decide which project goes first. Why is that? Managing projects is not the same as planning and strategy.
Any good plan would be laid out to do the most good quickly and projects would tie together to alleviate problems as quickly as possible.
Any good plan would be laid out to do the most good quickly and projects would tie together to alleviate problems as quickly as possible.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 6:55 am to doubleb
Higher taxes isn't always a bad thing. Especially if it means better schools than what EBR is offering.
$5k per kid per year and it's about break even.
Plus, it's not required. One could always move.
$5k per kid per year and it's about break even.
Plus, it's not required. One could always move.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:23 am to Mahootney
quote:
Higher taxes isn't always a bad thing. Especially if it means better schools than what EBR is offering.
$5k per kid per year and it's about break even.
Plus, it's not required. One could always move.
Wrong.
EBRPSS has repeatedly proven that despite spending more than the national average person student, it still can't even deliver average results. It's not a money problem.
And the initial incorporation of SG doesn't involve the school district.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:41 am to dragginass
quote:
And the initial incorporation of SG doesn't involve the school district.
The incorporation of St. George is based on citizens wanting to actually govern themselves and use their taxes to better their area since the City of BR does not provide them with fire, police, etc. Part of bettering the area is to provide better schools than what the City of Baton Rouge has put out.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 11:48 am to rowbear1922
Can't be worse than what BR is providing.

Posted on 12/4/18 at 11:57 am to Mahootney
quote:
Especially if it means better schools than what EBR is offering.
$5k per kid per year and it's about break even.
5k. I'm guessing you don't have a kid in private school
Posted on 12/4/18 at 3:51 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:Just spit balling here.
5k. I'm guessing you don't have a kid in private school
People whine about SG getting higher taxes.
Will the taxes really go up as much as it costs to send kids to private school?
That's really the break even point.
Otherwise, the options are to move to a decent school district or go pay private tuition.
Popular
Back to top



0







