- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:21 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Can I tell you how perfect it is that posters with the names WeeWee and WaWaWeeWa are having a back and forth on this topic. 
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:22 pm to Powerman
Cleveland Clinic is not some 2nd tier medical joint. Any study produced by them should be fairly highly regarded until proven differently.
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:24 pm to Bullfrog
Powerman doesn't care. He's dunking on idiot rednecks
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:28 pm to Deactived
I see your point.
But thank god for idiot rednecks that will pull people out of ditches. Everyone has their positives. One day maybe Powerman’s will be found.
But thank god for idiot rednecks that will pull people out of ditches. Everyone has their positives. One day maybe Powerman’s will be found.
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:30 pm to Proximo
quote:
WTF is a branch covidian? You really don’t get that?
Nope
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:31 pm to stout
Do they raise the risk, or are the higher-risk people getting vaccinated?
Either way, glad I stayed far far away from that fraud
Either way, glad I stayed far far away from that fraud
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:33 pm to Bullfrog
quote:
Cleveland Clinic is not some 2nd tier medical joint. Any study produced by them should be fairly highly regarded until proven differently.
It should be taken with a healthy dose of skepticism until it is peer reviewed. But that isn't the issue at hand. It's the interpretation of the study as the waweewawhatever his name is pointed out.
Something that is not surprisingly completely botched by the gateway pundit and stout
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:43 pm to OKBoomerSooner
quote:I admitted just skimmed through pieces of it, it didn't sound like the study did a very good job of controlling for the different types of people in each "class" if you will.
Do they raise the risk, or are the higher-risk people getting vaccinated?
Those who are unvaxxed are less likely to take a test if they are a little sick. Those who have gotten like 4 boosters are probably taking a Covid test at the very 1st sign of sniffles. The wording from the study itself specifically said they did not control for that and thus it probably skews the data.
This post was edited on 12/29/22 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:47 pm to Powerman
quote:
moron OP posted a study from the Gateway Pundit?
The irony of you calling me a moron while thinking Gateway Pundit were the ones conducting the study and acting arrogant about it like I'm the dumbass here.
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:48 pm to stout
quote:
The irony of you calling me a moron while thinking Gateway Pundit were the ones conducting the study and acting arrogant about it like I'm the dumbass here.
I didn't think they conducted the study
They're known for posting things that are incredibly unreliable and in this case misinterpreting the study as was pointed out to you
If you find anything on that website you should immediately be skeptical if you can't find it numerous places elsewhere
And even if you do find it elsewhere you should just post that link and not a link with their dumb frick commentary
Otherwise you just end up looking stupid
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:50 pm to Powerman
quote:
It's the interpretation of the study
The study literally said what the headline says
quote:
The risk of COVID-19 also varied by the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses previously received. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19
How do you interpret that, oh enlightened one?
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:51 pm to Powerman
You've been really mad at me this week so I'll ask you again...did I frick your mom or something?
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:52 pm to stout
NO NO YOU’RE SUPPOSED TO TRUST OUR SCIENCE, NOT THIS SCIENCE!!!!1!!!1!!!! THIS SCIENCE IS BAD AND RACIST
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:52 pm to stout
quote:Who do you think is more likely to take a Covid test?
How do you interpret that, oh enlightened one?
Someone who goes by some gender neutral pronouns that is quadruple vaxxed and wears a mash every where?
Or good ole "pureblood" baw who is convinced the vaccine has killed a million people and being used for population control?
The study didn't control for any of that, they said as much. Had they regularly tested every participant at equal intervals, this would be really good stuff.
This post was edited on 12/29/22 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:55 pm to stout
quote:
How do you interpret that, oh enlightened one?
I interpret that as them taking a couple of sentences from the study and making it the headline
Which might seem smart to you but it doesn't seem smart to most people
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:55 pm to stout
quote:
You've been really mad at me this week so I'll ask you again...did I frick your mom or something?
You can fix it by stop posting stupid shite
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:55 pm to Powerman
quote:
Wait a second...moron OP posted a study from the Gateway Pundit?
No the OP posted a study that was discussed on the gateway pundit. The OP also posted the link to the actual study. He might not understand what it means but he did not post a study conducted by the Gateway Pundit.
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:56 pm to shel311
Understand but you're acting like just because a group of people didn't get vaccinated means they never get tested for CV even if sick.
Posted on 12/29/22 at 3:57 pm to Powerman
quote:
Which might seem smart to you but it doesn't seem smart to most people
I'll go out on a limb and say judging by how no one here likes or respects you in the least that you don't speak for most people.
Popular
Back to top


0





