- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:15 pm to fightin tigers
I’m still waiting for you to specifically state what your objection is to the CDC study...
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:16 pm to Esquire
quote:
What makes you think I speak like that? This may blow your mind, but people can support Trump and still think you PTers are retarded.
do I have a long history of PT posts? Ohh wait, I don’t.
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:17 pm to Centinel
quote:
You're saying the CDC numbers shouldn't be trusted?
No
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:18 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:It isn’t a study.
I’m still waiting for you to specifically state what your objection is to the CDC study...
It is a report consisting of 5 separate case estimations with assumptions on the following:
Parameter values for disease severity, viral transmissibility, and pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic disease transmission
They make assumptions and input known data.
It isn’t a study.
It is simply another modeling system that is giving a “range”.
This post was edited on 5/25/20 at 7:19 pm
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:18 pm to Centinel
quote:
ETA: I'm sure you have zero issues monetizing the media outlets you agree with politically though.
Well yeah, the WSJ has a subscription.
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:20 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
No
Then your critique of this thread is based on?
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:21 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
I’m still waiting for you to specifically state what your objection is to the CDC study...
My objection is with how the linked article used CDC data
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:21 pm to Centinel
quote:
Then your critique of this thread is based on?
The OP, particularly the title, and the linked article
The only factual part of the title is 'from Poliboard' and maybe China Virus (pending tin foil source theories).
This post was edited on 5/25/20 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:22 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
The OP, particularly the title, and the linked article
And what exactly is the issue?
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:24 pm to Centinel
Stanford didn't confirm it.
It isn't 'about like the flu'
It wasn't a study.
The NPR article at least left out sensationalism
It isn't 'about like the flu'
It wasn't a study.
The NPR article at least left out sensationalism
This post was edited on 5/25/20 at 7:26 pm
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:26 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Stanford didn't confirm it.
It isn't about like the flu.
It wasn't a study.
None of these address the linked CDC article. I mean fine, if you want to summarily reject articles based on who reports them that's cool....I just expect you to be consistent the next time some tard starts drumming WaPo or NYT articles on here supporting shitting our collective pants when it comes to COVID.
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:29 pm to Centinel
The CDC info was already in another thread.
My beef isn't with the CDC info.
Yes, I will call out any opinion piece that people post as factual news. I don't care the source. It's why this type of shite article should stay on the Poliboard.
My beef isn't with the CDC info.
Yes, I will call out any opinion piece that people post as factual news. I don't care the source. It's why this type of shite article should stay on the Poliboard.
This post was edited on 5/25/20 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:32 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
It's why this type of shite article should stay on the Poliboard.
The issue is there's a double standard in what constitutes a "shite article" around here, and what should "stay on the Poliboard."
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:37 pm to Centinel
quote:
The issue is there's a double standard in what constitutes a "shite article" around here, and what should "stay on the Poliboard."
Something tells me you think articles that represent your side are the ones people are calling 'shite' and think 'should stay on the poliboard'
Don't play the victim.
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:38 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Something tells me you think articles that represent your side are the ones people are calling 'shite' and think 'should stay on the poliboard'
Don't play the victim.
This is probably the most tone deaf shite I’ve read in a while!
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:39 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Something tells me you think articles that represent your side are the ones people are calling 'shite' and think 'should stay on the poliboard'
Not really. Trump is a blowhard a-hole who I've never voted for, and never will. I haven't voted for a Republican since 1996.
Sorry to ruin your stereotype.
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:42 pm to Centinel
The stereotype that most people think people are workng against their political beliefs
I don't care what type of political beliefs you have, everyone thinks that.
I don't care what type of political beliefs you have, everyone thinks that.
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:46 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
The stereotype that most people think people are workng against their political beliefs
I don't care what type of political beliefs you have, everyone thinks that.
That's great.
This statement:
quote:
Something tells me you think articles that represent your side are the ones people are calling 'shite' and think 'should stay on the poliboard'
Is still categorically wrong. No matter how you spin it.
Posted on 5/25/20 at 7:51 pm to Centinel
Aight dude. Keep fighting the good fight. Solidarity or whatever.
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News